• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一个支持父母参与儿童死亡审查的工具包:一项基于经验的协同设计研究。

Developing a toolkit to support parents' involvement in child death review: an experience-based co-design study.

作者信息

Garstang Joanna Jane, Spry Jenna, Routledge Gayle, Pease Anna, Shaw Karen L, Kenyon Sara

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK

Children and Families Division, Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 2025 Mar 19;110(4):276-282. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327642.

DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2024-327642
PMID:39647863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12013563/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding why children die is important for grieving parents and for informing system improvements aimed at prevention and future care. Many countries have child death review (CDR) process, but little is known about how best to engage parents. The aim of this study was to use experience-based co-design to create a toolkit to support parental involvement in CDR.

METHODS

A survey of English paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and palliative care services explored practices and identified a diverse sample of sites for professional interviews. Bereaved parents were recruited through charities, hospitals and social media. Semistructured interviews were held with parents and professionals followed by co-design workshops to develop the toolkit.

RESULTS

There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care.21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed.23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed.10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers.The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-design has successfully supported the development of a toolkit of resources in a sensitive area. It required considerable support from bereavement support organisations and researchers. Future evaluation is required.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN14790455.

摘要

背景

了解儿童死亡原因对于悲痛的父母以及为预防和未来护理而进行的系统改进都很重要。许多国家都有儿童死亡审查(CDR)程序,但对于如何最好地让父母参与其中却知之甚少。本研究的目的是利用基于经验的共同设计来创建一个工具包,以支持父母参与儿童死亡审查。

方法

对英国儿科重症监护病房(PICUs)和姑息治疗服务进行了一项调查,探讨了相关做法,并确定了一个多样化的专业访谈地点样本。通过慈善机构、医院和社交媒体招募了失去亲人的父母。对父母和专业人员进行了半结构化访谈,随后举办了共同设计研讨会以开发工具包。

结果

共收到29份调查问卷回复,其中21份来自儿科重症监护病房的回复中有13份,34份来自姑息治疗的回复中有16份。采访了21名多学科医疗保健专业人员。采访了23位在2021年至2022年期间孩子在0至18岁之间死亡的父母,这些孩子要么在住院期间死亡,要么在接受姑息治疗期间死亡。10名父母和23名专业人员参加了共同设计会议。从父母的经历中确定的关键情感接触点包括:了解儿童死亡审查会议、被征求意见、知道日期以及收到反馈。所有人都认同让父母参与的重要性、沟通要清晰,以及关键工作人员需要资源和培训。该工具包包括培训视频、一个标准化流程,其中包括模板信件、反馈表、易读传单以及一个解释让父母参与的重要性的动画。

结论

共同设计成功地支持了在一个敏感领域开发资源工具包。这需要丧亲支持组织和研究人员提供大量支持。需要进行未来评估。

试验注册号

ISRCTN14790455。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a41/12013563/96a997bdcff9/archdischild-110-4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a41/12013563/96a997bdcff9/archdischild-110-4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a41/12013563/96a997bdcff9/archdischild-110-4-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing a toolkit to support parents' involvement in child death review: an experience-based co-design study.开发一个支持父母参与儿童死亡审查的工具包:一项基于经验的协同设计研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2025 Mar 19;110(4):276-282. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327642.
2
Death, bereavement and randomised controlled trials (BRACELET): a methodological study of policy and practice in neonatal and paediatric intensive care trials.死亡、丧亲之痛与随机对照试验(BRACELET):新生儿及儿科重症监护试验政策与实践的方法学研究
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Jul;18(42):1-410. doi: 10.3310/hta18420.
3
When a Child Dies in the PICU: Practice Recommendations From a Qualitative Study of Bereaved Parents.当儿童在 PICU 中死亡:对失去孩子的父母进行定性研究的实践建议。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):e447-e451. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002040.
4
Bereaved parents' views on end-of-life care for children with cancer: Quality marker implications.丧亲父母对癌症患儿临终关怀的看法:质量标志物的意义。
Cancer. 2020 Jul 15;126(14):3352-3359. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32935. Epub 2020 May 8.
5
Healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医疗保健使用者就患有危及生命疾病的儿童与医疗保健专业人员沟通的经历:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):33-42. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2413.
6
Bereaved parents' experiences of research participation.丧亲父母的研究参与体验。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Nov 7;17(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0375-4.
7
Parental experiences of end of life care decision-making for children with life-limiting conditions in the paediatric intensive care unit: a qualitative interview study.儿科重症监护病房中患有危及生命疾病的儿童的父母在临终关怀决策方面的体验:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e028548. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028548.
8
The changing nature of relationships between parents and healthcare providers when a child dies in the paediatric intensive care unit.当孩子在儿科重症监护病房死亡时,父母与医疗保健提供者之间关系的变化性质。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Jan;74(1):89-99. doi: 10.1111/jan.13401. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
9
Parental Attitudes Towards Palliative Care in Pediatric Oncology: Insights From Bereaved Families.儿科肿瘤姑息治疗中父母的态度:来自丧亲家庭的见解
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 Jan;69(1):e27-e36. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.09.001. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
10
Rigour and Rapport: a qualitative study of parents' and professionals' experiences of joint agency infant death investigation.严谨与融洽:关于父母和专业人员联合进行婴儿死亡调查经历的定性研究
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Feb 7;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0803-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Needs and experiences of families after a sudden unexplained death in childhood: a qualitative study.儿童期不明原因猝死家庭的需求与经历:一项定性研究
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Aug 24;9(1):e003812. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003812.
2
Family Involvement in Learning From Expected Child Deaths: A Qualitative Study of UK Parents.家庭参与从儿童预期死亡中学习:对英国父母的定性研究
Child Care Health Dev. 2025 Jul;51(4):e70134. doi: 10.1111/cch.70134.
3
Child death review: understanding variations in practice using normalisation process theory.

本文引用的文献

1
Child Fatality Review.儿童死亡审查
Pediatrics. 2024 Mar 1;153(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-065481.
2
Trauma-informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs.创伤知情共同生产:合作与专业知识相结合,改善有复杂需求的女性获得初级保健的途径。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1895-1914. doi: 10.1111/hex.13795. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
3
Barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies for the initiation of Child Death Review system in Japan: a modified Delphi method study.
儿童死亡审查:运用规范化过程理论理解实践中的差异
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 May 27;9(1):e003432. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003432.
日本启动儿童死亡审查制度的障碍、促进因素和实施策略:一项修正后的德尔菲法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 5;22(1):1482. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08668-x.
4
Death review of children receiving medical care at home.在家中接受医疗护理的儿童死亡回顾。
Pediatr Res. 2022 Apr;91(5):1286-1289. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01606-3. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
5
Use and reporting of experience-based codesign studies in the healthcare setting: a systematic review.在医疗保健环境中使用和报告基于经验的共同设计研究:系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jan;29(1):64-76. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009570. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
6
PARENTS 2 study: consensus report for parental engagement in the perinatal mortality review process.PARENTS 2 研究:围产期死亡评审过程中父母参与的共识报告。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;54(2):215-224. doi: 10.1002/uog.20139.
7
Parents' Perspectives on "Keeping Their Children Safe" in the Hospital.父母对“在医院保障孩子安全”的看法。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2016 Oct-Dec;31(4):318-26. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000193.
8
Parent-Reported Errors and Adverse Events in Hospitalized Children.家长报告的住院儿童错误和不良事件
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Apr;170(4):e154608. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.4608. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
9
What do bereaved parents want from professionals after the sudden death of their child: a systematic review of the literature.孩子突然离世后,丧亲父母希望从专业人士那里得到什么:文献系统综述
BMC Pediatr. 2014 Oct 15;14:269. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-269.
10
Cause of death and the quest for meaning after the loss of a child.孩子去世后的死因和意义探寻。
Death Stud. 2013 Apr;37(4):311-42. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2012.673533.