• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西一家三级医院全膝关节置换术翻修的原因

Causes of Revision of Total Knee Arthroplasties in a Tertiary Hospital in Brazil.

作者信息

Mozella Alan de Paula, Cobra Hugo Alexandre de Araújo Barros, Minamoto Sandra Tie Nishibe, Salim Rodrigo, Leal Ana Carolina

机构信息

Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Centro de Cirurgia do Joelho, Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia (INTO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Departamento de Ortopedia e Anestesiologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024 Dec 7;59(5):e696-e701. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757304. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1757304
PMID:39649045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11624922/
Abstract

To identify the causes of revision of total knee arthroplasty in a referral center in Brazil.  This is a case series, with 80 patients undergoing revision surgery for total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) at a referral center for knee surgery, between August 2019 and November 2021, with a mean age of 69.6 years. Of these patients, 60.23% were female and 39.77% were male. The average body mass index (BMI) was 30.23 kg/m . The causes of TKA failure were defined as: periprosthetic infection according to the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria, ligament instability, range of motion limitation, periprosthetic fracture, malalignment, aseptic loosening, pain due to non-replacement of the patellar cartilage, polyethylene wear, fracture of implants, insufficiency of the extensor mechanism.  Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) was the main cause of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), corresponding to 47.73% of cases. Aseptic loosening of one or more components represented the second most frequent reason for TKA failure, accounting for 35.23% of revisions. Range of motion limitation represented the third most frequent cause, accounting for 5.68% of surgeries. Instability was the fourth most frequent reason for RTKA, occurring in 4.55% of patients. The other causes of revision were: periprosthetic fracture (3.41%), failure due to rupture of the extensor mechanism (2.27%), and pain attributed to non-replacement of the patellar cartilage (1.14%).  Periprosthetic joint infection was the most frequent cause of TKA revision in our series. Other reasons for TKA failures were, in descending order: aseptic loosening, limited range of motion, and instability.

摘要

确定巴西一家转诊中心全膝关节置换术翻修的原因。 这是一个病例系列研究,2019年8月至2021年11月期间,80例患者在一家膝关节手术转诊中心接受了全膝关节置换翻修手术(RTKA),平均年龄为69.6岁。在这些患者中,60.23%为女性,39.77%为男性。平均体重指数(BMI)为30.23kg/m²。全膝关节置换失败的原因定义为:根据2018年国际共识会议标准的假体周围感染、韧带不稳定、活动范围受限、假体周围骨折、对线不良、无菌性松动、因未置换髌软骨导致的疼痛、聚乙烯磨损、植入物骨折、伸肌机制功能不全。 假体周围关节感染(PJI)是全膝关节置换翻修术(TKA)的主要原因,占病例的47.73%。一个或多个组件的无菌性松动是TKA失败的第二常见原因,占翻修手术的35.23%。活动范围受限是第三常见原因,占手术的5.68%。不稳定是RTKA的第四常见原因,发生在4.55%的患者中。其他翻修原因包括:假体周围骨折(3.41%)、伸肌机制断裂导致的失败(2.27%)以及因未置换髌软骨导致的疼痛(1.14%)。 假体周围关节感染是我们系列研究中TKA翻修最常见的原因。TKA失败的其他原因按降序排列为:无菌性松动、活动范围受限和不稳定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb9b/11624922/6148eb1ed2aa/10-1055-s-0042-1757304-i2200113pt-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb9b/11624922/0433ea357465/10-1055-s-0042-1757304-i2200113en-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb9b/11624922/6148eb1ed2aa/10-1055-s-0042-1757304-i2200113pt-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb9b/11624922/0433ea357465/10-1055-s-0042-1757304-i2200113en-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb9b/11624922/6148eb1ed2aa/10-1055-s-0042-1757304-i2200113pt-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Causes of Revision of Total Knee Arthroplasties in a Tertiary Hospital in Brazil.巴西一家三级医院全膝关节置换术翻修的原因
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024 Dec 7;59(5):e696-e701. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757304. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Current failure mechanisms after knee arthroplasty have changed: polyethylene wear is less common in revision surgery.目前膝关节置换术后的失败机制已经改变:聚乙烯磨损在翻修手术中不太常见。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 May 6;97(9):715-20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01534.
3
Infection and periprosthetic fracture are the leading causes of failure after aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty.感染和假体周围骨折是无菌性翻修全膝关节置换术后失败的主要原因。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Aug;141(8):1373-1383. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03698-8. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
4
Revision Knee Arthroplasty in a Tertiary Center: Infection Remains the Leading Cause for Primary Revisions, While Aseptic Loosening Led Causes for Rerevisions.三级医疗中心的膝关节翻修置换术:感染仍是初次翻修的主要原因,而无菌性松动是再次翻修的主要原因。
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Sep;40(9):2226-2234. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.02.045. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
5
Failure Analysis in Multiple TKA Revisions-Periprosthetic Infections Remain Surgeons' Nemesis.多次全膝关节置换翻修术中的失败分析——假体周围感染仍是外科医生的克星。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 13;11(2):376. doi: 10.3390/jcm11020376.
6
[Unicondylar knee arthroplasties demonstrate a significantly increased risk of aseptic revisions compared with unconstrained and constrained TKA : Analysis of aseptic revisions after unicondylar and primary total knee arthroplasty of the German Arthroplasty Register].[与非限制性和限制性全膝关节置换术相比,单髁膝关节置换术无菌翻修风险显著增加:德国关节置换登记处单髁膝关节置换术和初次全膝关节置换术后无菌翻修分析]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024 Oct;53(10):789-798. doi: 10.1007/s00132-024-04561-z. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
7
High Rates of Early Septic Failure, but Low Rates of Aseptic Loosening After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Contemporary Rotating-Hinge Prostheses.使用当代旋转铰链假体进行全膝关节置换翻修术后早期感染性失败率高,但无菌性松动率低。
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Feb;40(2):460-466.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.013. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
8
Unicondylar knee arthroplasty demonstrating a significant increased risk for aseptic revisions compared to unconstrained and constrained total knee arthroplasty: An analysis of aseptic revisions after unicondylar and primary total knee arthroplasty of the German Arthroplasty Registry.单髁膝关节置换术与非约束性和约束性全膝关节置换术相比,无菌翻修的风险显著增加:德国关节置换登记处的单髁和初次全膝关节置换术后无菌翻修分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Jul;32(7):1775-1784. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12192. Epub 2024 Apr 21.
9
Have the frequency of and reasons for revision total knee arthroplasty changed since 2000? Comparison of two cohorts from the same hospital: 255 cases (2013-2016) and 68 cases (1991-1998).自 2000 年以来,全膝关节置换术的修订频率和原因是否发生了变化?对同一医院的两个队列进行比较:255 例(2013-2016 年)和 68 例(1991-1998 年)。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Jun;105(4):639-645. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.01.025. Epub 2019 May 11.
10
Contemporary failure aetiologies of the primary, posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.初次后稳定型全膝关节置换术的当代失败病因
Bone Joint J. 2017 May;99-B(5):647-652. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-0617.R3.

本文引用的文献

1
Recent trends in revision knee arthroplasty in Germany.德国膝关节翻修手术的最新趋势。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 29;11(1):15479. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94988-7.
2
Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换翻修术中的骨缺损
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021 Apr;56(2):138-146. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713392. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
3
The economic impact of periprosthetic infection in total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后假体周围感染的经济学影响。
Can J Surg. 2021 Mar 5;64(2):E144-E148. doi: 10.1503/cjs.012519.
4
Infection and periprosthetic fracture are the leading causes of failure after aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty.感染和假体周围骨折是无菌性翻修全膝关节置换术后失败的主要原因。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Aug;141(8):1373-1383. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03698-8. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
5
Reasons for failure in primary total knee arthroplasty - An analysis of prospectively collected registry data.初次全膝关节置换术失败的原因——对前瞻性收集的登记数据的分析
J Orthop. 2020 Dec 31;23:60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.008. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.
6
The projected volume of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty will place an immense burden on future health care systems over the next 30 years.预计未来 30 年内,初次和翻修全膝关节置换术的预估数量将给未来的医疗保健系统带来巨大的负担。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Oct;29(10):3287-3298. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06154-7. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
7
Why Do Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties Fail? A Single-Center Review of 1632 Revision Total Knees Comparing Historic and Modern Cohorts.为什么翻修全膝关节置换术会失败?单中心 1632 例翻修全膝关节回顾性研究比较历史组和现代组。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Oct;35(10):2938-2943. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.050. Epub 2020 May 28.
8
Have the frequency of and reasons for revision total knee arthroplasty changed since 2000? Comparison of two cohorts from the same hospital: 255 cases (2013-2016) and 68 cases (1991-1998).自 2000 年以来,全膝关节置换术的修订频率和原因是否发生了变化?对同一医院的两个队列进行比较:255 例(2013-2016 年)和 68 例(1991-1998 年)。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Jun;105(4):639-645. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.01.025. Epub 2019 May 11.
9
Arthrofibrosis After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management.全膝关节置换术后关节纤维化:病理生理学、诊断与管理
Orthop Clin North Am. 2019 Jul;50(3):269-279. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
10
2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection: Research Priorities from the General Assembly Questions.2018 年肌肉骨骼感染国际共识会议:大会提问的研究重点。
J Orthop Res. 2019 May;37(5):997-1006. doi: 10.1002/jor.24293. Epub 2019 Apr 25.