Suppr超能文献

用于量化大学生运动员跳跃高度的可穿戴技术的设备间可靠性。

Inter-device reliability of wearable technology for quantifying jump height in collegiate athletes.

作者信息

Nickerson Brett S, Medrano Noel F, Perez Gabriel L, Narvaez Samantha V, Carrillo Joshua, Duque Misael

机构信息

College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, TX, USA.

出版信息

Biol Sport. 2020 Dec;37(4):383-387. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2020.96851. Epub 2020 Jul 5.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter-device reliability of three VERT devices (Mayfonk Athletic, Florida, USA) when worn on the waist (W), left-hip (LH), and right-hip (RH) during single- and double-leg counter movement jumps (CMJ) in collegiate athletes. Thirty-two female and twenty-eight male NCAA Division II athletes (n = 60) participated in the present study. Jump height (JH) values for double-leg CMJs were analyzed by each device using a one-way repeated measures ANOVA whereas a 2 (jump leg) x 3 (wear location) repeated measures ANOVA was employed to evaluate single-leg CMJs. Reliability of the VERT devices were based upon intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Double-leg CMJs revealed an excellent ICC between all three VERT devices (ICC = 0.969). However, JH for RH and LH (45.69 ± 9.84 and 45.82 ± 10.45 cm, respectively) were on average lower than W (50.44 ± 12.37cm; both p < 0.001). The ICCs were excellent for right- and left-leg CMJs (ICC = 0.939 and 0.941, respectively). However, an interaction was observed (p < 0.001). No differences existed for left- or right-leg when VERT was worn on the waist. However, JH was higher when VERT devices were worn on the opposite hip of the jump leg (i.e., LH>RH for right-leg CMJs; RH>LH for leftleg CMJs; all p < 0.001). Results suggest that LH and RH are interchangeable for double-leg CMJs, but not with waist despite excellent reliability. In addition, all wear locations provided excellent ICCs for single-leg CMJs. However, waist provides more consistent JH values for right- and left-leg CMJs while RH and LH show more variability.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估三种VERT设备(美国佛罗里达州迈方克运动公司生产)在大学生运动员进行单腿和双腿反向纵跳(CMJ)时,佩戴在腰部(W)、左髋部(LH)和右髋部(RH)的设备间可靠性。32名女性和28名男性美国大学体育协会(NCAA)二级运动员(n = 60)参与了本研究。使用单因素重复测量方差分析,由每个设备分析双腿CMJ的跳跃高度(JH)值,而采用2(跳跃腿)×3(佩戴位置)重复测量方差分析来评估单腿CMJ。VERT设备的可靠性基于组内相关系数(ICC)。双腿CMJ显示,所有三种VERT设备之间的ICC极佳(ICC = 0.969)。然而,右髋部和左髋部的JH(分别为45.69±9.84和45.82±10.45厘米)平均低于腰部(50.44±12.37厘米;p均<0.001)。右腿和左腿CMJ的ICC极佳(分别为ICC = 0.939和0.941)。然而,观察到有交互作用(p < 0.001)。当VERT佩戴在腰部时,左腿或右腿之间没有差异。然而,当VERT设备佩戴在与跳跃腿相对的髋部时,JH更高(即,右腿CMJ时左髋部>右髋部;左腿CMJ时右髋部>左髋部;所有p < 0.001)。结果表明,对于双腿CMJ,左髋部和右髋部可互换,但与腰部不可互换,尽管可靠性极佳。此外,所有佩戴位置对于单腿CMJ都提供了极佳的ICC。然而,腰部为右腿和左腿CMJ提供了更一致的JH值,而右髋部和左髋部显示出更多变异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b416/7725037/6c3cce4fabf1/JBS-37-96851-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验