External validation of ID-BactER and Shapiro scores for predicting bacteraemia in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION

The blood culture positivity rate in the emergency department (ED) is <20%; however, the mortality associated with Community-acquired bacteraemia (CAB) is as high as 37.8%. For this reason, several models have been developed to predict blood culture positivity for the diagnosis of CAB.

OBJECTIVE

To validate two bacteraemia prediction models in a high-complexity hospital in Colombia.

DESIGN

External validation study of the ID-BactER and Shapiro scores based on a consecutive cohort of patients who underwent blood culture within 48 h of ED admission.

METHODS

Scale calibration was assessed by comparing expected and observed events (calibration belt). Discriminatory ability was assessed by area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC).

RESULTS

We included 1347 patients, of whom 18.85% were diagnosed with CAB. The most common focus of infection was the respiratory tract (36.23%), and the most common microorganism was (52.15%). The Shapiro score underestimated the risk in all categories and its discriminatory ability was poor (AUC 0.68 CI 95% 0.64-0.73). In contrast, the ID-BactER score showed an adequate observed/expected event ratio of 1.07 (CI 0.85-1.36;  = 0.018) and adequate calibration when expected events were greater than 20%, in addition to good discriminatory ability (AUC 0.74 95% CI 0.70-0.78).

CONCLUSION

The Shapiro score is not calibrated, and its discriminatory ability is poor. ID-BactER has an adequate calibration when the expected events are higher than 20%. Limiting blood culture collection to patients with an ID-BactER score ⩾4 could reduce unnecessary blood culture collection and thus health care costs.