• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度人群中自体腘绳肌腱移植重建前交叉韧带的功能结局:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Functional outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft in Indian population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Annamalai R, Venkatramanaiah C, Sujhithra A, Vignesh N, Danis Vijay D

机构信息

Research Scholar, Bharath Medical College and Hospital, Bhaarath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of Orthopedics, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Maduranthakam, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Nov 12;59:102805. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102805. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102805
PMID:39650719
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11617687/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a significant orthopedic issue globally with varying success rates among different populations. Better understanding of functional outcome can help design suitable protocols for ACL reconstruction and recovery. This review aims to evaluate the epidemiological trends and functional outcomes of ACLR procedures in India.

METHODS

The review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, by searching in Google Scholar, Pubmed, Web of Science and Science Direct databases in February 2024. The study encompassed patient demographics, and postoperative outcomes in Indian populations upon ACLR using hamstring tendon autografts. Meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.4 using random-effects models. Funnel plots were used to explore publication bias. Subgroup analyses of follow-up terms and age were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies were pooled for overall qualitative and quantitative analysis. Sports injuries (52 %) were found to be more common, followed by road traffic accidents (31 %). Injuries were mostly on the right knees (56 %). Functional outcome analysis using Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (MD 34.74, 95 % CI 31.58 to 37.89), International Knee Documentation Committee (MD 36.74, 95 % CI 32.36 to 41.13), Tegner Activity Scale (MD 0.90, 95 % CI -0.01 to 1.80) revealed statistically significant overall outcome effect. Statistically non-significant differences were found between follow-up to 6 months and follow-up above 6 months as well as with age. However, meta-analysis showed high level of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

ACLR in Indian population is largely successful in restoring functional activity. However, the outcome of this review is limited by the heterogeneity factor. Further, the Indian studies have not focused on factors affecting the outcome. Therefore, future studies in this direction are needed for understanding the clinical success.

摘要

背景

前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤是一个全球性的重要骨科问题,不同人群的成功率各不相同。更好地了解功能结果有助于设计适合ACL重建和恢复的方案。本综述旨在评估印度ACL重建手术(ACLR)的流行病学趋势和功能结果。

方法

本综述按照PRISMA指南进行,于2024年2月在谷歌学术、PubMed、科学网和科学直投数据库中进行检索。该研究涵盖了印度人群接受自体腘绳肌腱ACLR后的患者人口统计学和术后结果。使用RevMan 5.4采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。使用漏斗图探索发表偏倚。还对随访时间和年龄进行了亚组分析。

结果

共纳入26项研究进行总体定性和定量分析。发现运动损伤(52%)更为常见,其次是道路交通事故(31%)。损伤大多发生在右膝(56%)。使用Lysholm膝关节评分量表(MD 34.74,95%CI 31.58至37.89)、国际膝关节文献委员会(MD 36.74,95%CI 32.36至41.13)、Tegner活动量表(MD 0.90,95%CI -0.01至1.80)进行的功能结果分析显示总体结果效应具有统计学意义。在6个月随访和6个月以上随访以及年龄之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。然而,荟萃分析显示异质性水平较高。

结论

印度人群的ACLR在恢复功能活动方面大多是成功的。然而,本综述的结果受到异质性因素的限制。此外,印度的研究尚未关注影响结果的因素。因此,需要在这个方向上进行进一步的研究以了解临床成功率。

相似文献

1
Functional outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft in Indian population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.印度人群中自体腘绳肌腱移植重建前交叉韧带的功能结局:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Nov 12;59:102805. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102805. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建中用于移植物固定的生物可吸收与金属干涉螺钉对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 24;7(7):CD009772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009772.pub2.
3
Long-term results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft with a minimum follow-up of 10 years-a systematic review.前交叉韧带重建使用髌腱和自体腘绳肌腱移植物的 10 年以上长期结果:系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4277-4289. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04687-9. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
4
Comparison of Graft Failure Rate Between Autografts Placed via an Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Technique: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression.通过解剖学前交叉韧带重建技术植入的自体移植物之间的移植失败率比较:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):1069-79. doi: 10.1177/0363546515584043. Epub 2015 May 21.
5
The incidence of tibial tunnel coalition is higher than femoral tunnel coalition in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts: A systematic review.双束腘绳肌腱重建前交叉韧带术中胫骨隧道合并症的发生率高于股骨隧道合并症:一项系统评价。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Dec;108(8):103407. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103407. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
6
Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults.成人前交叉韧带断裂:髌腱自体移植与腘绳肌腱自体移植的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD005960. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005960.pub2.
7
Contralateral hamstring autografts do not provide benefit compared to ipsilateral hamstring autografts in primary or revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.在初次或翻修前交叉韧带重建中,与同侧腘绳肌自体移植物相比,对侧腘绳肌自体移植物并无优势:一项系统评价
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5641-5651. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07597-4. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
8
The Importance of Patient Sex in the Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.患者性别在前交叉韧带重建结果中的重要性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):242-54. doi: 10.1177/0363546515573008. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
9
Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries.治疗前交叉韧带损伤的手术与保守干预措施
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 3;4(4):CD011166. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011166.pub2.
10
Lower donor site morbidity with hamstring and quadriceps tendon autograft compared with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.前交叉韧带重建后,与髌腱骨-骨移植物相比,使用腘绳肌腱和股四头肌腱自体移植物可降低供体部位发病率:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Aug;31(8):3339-3352. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07402-2. Epub 2023 Mar 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Demographic characteristics of patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at a tertiary care hospital in India.在印度一家三级护理医院接受前交叉韧带重建手术的患者的人口统计学特征。
World J Clin Cases. 2023 May 26;11(15):3464-3470. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i15.3464.
2
Functional outcome of an 'all-inside' technique in female anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at long-term follow-up: A gender-sensitive analysis.长期随访中女性前交叉韧带重建中“全内”技术的功能结果:一项性别敏感分析。
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231175810. doi: 10.1177/17455057231175810.
3
Current trends in graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - part I: anatomy, biomechanics, graft incorporation and fixation.前交叉韧带重建移植物选择的当前趋势——第一部分:解剖学、生物力学、移植物整合与固定
J Exp Orthop. 2023 Apr 1;10(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00600-4.
4
Clinical outcome and computer tomography based tunnel placement evaluation following arthroscopic anteromedial portal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in non-athletic population.非运动员人群关节镜下前内侧入路前交叉韧带重建术后的临床结果及基于计算机断层扫描的隧道位置评估
Int J Burns Trauma. 2022 Dec 15;12(6):232-240. eCollection 2022.
5
Efficacy of Repair for ACL Injury: A Meta‑analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.ACL 损伤修复疗效的 Meta 分析:随机对照试验研究
Int J Sports Med. 2022 Dec;43(13):1071-1083. doi: 10.1055/a-1755-4925. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
6
Sexual Dimorphisms in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Current Concepts Review.前交叉韧带损伤中的性别差异:当前概念综述
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Dec 17;9(12):23259671211025304. doi: 10.1177/23259671211025304. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
8
Original study: early patient-reported functional outcome of all-inside ACL reconstruction as compared to anteromedial portal technique.原始研究:与前内侧入路技术相比,全内 ACL 重建的早期患者报告功能结果。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Oct;31(7):1477-1483. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02912-6. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
9
Epidemiology of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery in Italy: A 15-Year Nationwide Registry Study.意大利前交叉韧带重建手术的流行病学:一项为期15年的全国性登记研究。
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 10;10(2):223. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020223.
10
Correlation between anthropometric measurements and activity level on length and diameter of semitendinosus tendon autograft in knee ligament surgery: A prospective observational study.膝关节韧带手术中人体测量学指标与半腱肌肌腱自体移植物长度和直径的活动水平之间的相关性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
SICOT J. 2020;6:23. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2020007. Epub 2020 Jun 25.