Ehlers Ellen, Kovaleski Laura, Devaskar Sangita, Kennedy Sara, Plotzker Rosalyn E
From the Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Control Branch, Division of Communicable Disease Control (DCDC), Center for Infectious Diseases (CID), California Department of Public Health.
Planned Parenthood, Northern California, Sacramento.
Sex Transm Dis. 2025 Jan 1;52(1):9-13. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002072. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
Reportable sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have increased in California, with dramatic rises in prenatal and congenital syphilis. In response, in 2018 Planned Parenthood Northern California implemented 2 opt-out screening protocols: (1) HIV, chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis co-screening for pregnant patients at pregnancy diagnosis and (2) linking HIV and syphilis screening for all patients.
Using qualitative analyses, we explored implementation barriers and facilitators that can be addressed by clinical leadership and staff to expand uptake of enhanced screening protocols. Sixteen staff were interviewed across 3 Planned Parenthood Northern California clinics. Primary thematic analysis followed by secondary subanalysis identified themes. Analyses of questions were only included for each interviewee if answered and applicable.
Five themes of commentary emerged, featuring both facilitators and barriers for protocol implementation: patient education/communication, staff education/communication, workflow; patient willingness, and (for protocol 1 only) visit complexity at the time of pregnancy diagnosis. Additional findings included the following: 93% (13 of 14) stated protocols increased syphilis screening and identification; 100% (12 of 12) reported positive impacts on patient care; 42% (5 of 12) noted increases in staff workload, 25% (3 of 12) reported workload improvements over time, and 33% (4 of 12) reported no workload-related impacts; and 86% (13 of 15) reported decreased screening during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Addressing patient and staff education during the beginning stages of implementation may have positive impacts on willingness to adopt new protocols. Consideration of workflow and visit complexity at pregnancy diagnosis may also aid in successful implementation of expanded STI screening protocols in family planning clinics.
在加利福尼亚州,可报告的性传播感染(STIs)有所增加,产前和先天性梅毒显著上升。作为回应,2018年北加利福尼亚计划生育组织实施了2种选择退出筛查方案:(1)在妊娠诊断时对孕妇进行艾滋病毒、衣原体、淋病和梅毒联合筛查;(2)对所有患者进行艾滋病毒和梅毒联合筛查。
我们采用定性分析方法,探讨了临床领导和工作人员可以解决的实施障碍和促进因素,以扩大对强化筛查方案的采用。对北加利福尼亚计划生育组织的3家诊所的16名工作人员进行了访谈。首先进行主要主题分析,然后进行次要子分析以确定主题。仅在回答且适用的情况下,才纳入对每个受访者问题的分析。
出现了五个评论主题,既有方案实施的促进因素,也有障碍:患者教育/沟通、工作人员教育/沟通、工作流程;患者意愿,以及(仅针对方案1)妊娠诊断时的就诊复杂性。其他发现包括:93%(14人中的13人)表示方案增加了梅毒筛查和识别;100%(12人中的12人)报告对患者护理有积极影响;42%(12人中的5人)指出工作人员工作量增加,25%(12人中的3人)报告随着时间推移工作量有所改善,33%(12人中的4人)报告没有与工作量相关的影响;86%(15人中的13人)报告在新冠疫情期间筛查减少。
在实施的初始阶段解决患者和工作人员教育问题,可能会对采用新方案的意愿产生积极影响。考虑妊娠诊断时的工作流程和就诊复杂性,也可能有助于计划生育诊所成功实施扩大的性传播感染筛查方案。