• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与健康技术相关的离散选择实验应包含哪些属性?系统文献回顾。

What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, University of Castilla La-Mancha (UCLM), Talavera de la Reina (Toledo), Spain.

Research Institute for Evaluation and Public Policies (IRAPP), Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0219905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219905. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0219905
PMID:31318926
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6639002/
Abstract

Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are a way to assess priority-setting in health care provision. This approach allows for the evaluation of individuals' preferences as a means of adding criteria to traditional quality-adjusted life year analysis. The aim of this systematic literature review was to identify attributes for designing a DCE in order to then develop and validate a framework that supports decision-making on health technologies. Our systematic literature review replicated the methods and search terms used by de Bekker-Grob et al. 2012 and Clark et al. 2014. The Medline database was searched for articles dated between 2008 and 2015. The search was limited to studies in English that reflected general preferences and were choice-based, published as full-text articles and related to health technologies. This study included 72 papers, 52% of which focused on DCEs on drug treatments. The average number of attributes used in all included DCE studies was 5.74 (SD 1.98). The most frequently used attributes in these DCEs were improvements in health (78%), side effects (57%) and cost of treatment (53%). Other, less frequently used attributes included waiting time for treatment or duration of treatment (25%), severity of disease (7%) and value for money (4%). The attributes identified might inform future DCE surveys designed to study societal preferences regarding health technologies in order to better inform decisions in health technology assessment.

摘要

离散选择实验(DCEs)是评估医疗保健提供中的优先顺序的一种方法。这种方法允许评估个人的偏好,作为对传统质量调整生命年分析添加标准的一种手段。本系统文献综述的目的是确定设计 DCE 的属性,以便随后开发和验证一个支持健康技术决策的框架。我们的系统文献综述复制了 de Bekker-Grob 等人在 2012 年和 Clark 等人在 2014 年使用的方法和搜索词。在 2008 年至 2015 年期间,对 Medline 数据库进行了搜索,以获取文章。搜索仅限于反映一般偏好且基于选择的、以全文发表并与健康技术相关的英语研究。本研究包括 72 篇论文,其中 52%的论文集中在药物治疗的 DCE 上。所有纳入的 DCE 研究中使用的平均属性数为 5.74(SD 1.98)。在这些 DCE 中使用最频繁的属性是健康状况的改善(78%)、副作用(57%)和治疗费用(53%)。其他不太常用的属性包括治疗等待时间或治疗持续时间(25%)、疾病严重程度(7%)和物有所值(4%)。确定的属性可能会为未来旨在研究社会对健康技术偏好的 DCE 调查提供信息,以便更好地为健康技术评估中的决策提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cab9/6639002/8240c28a5fdd/pone.0219905.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cab9/6639002/019374ef831e/pone.0219905.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cab9/6639002/8240c28a5fdd/pone.0219905.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cab9/6639002/019374ef831e/pone.0219905.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cab9/6639002/8240c28a5fdd/pone.0219905.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review.与健康技术相关的离散选择实验应包含哪些属性?系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0219905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219905. eCollection 2019.
2
A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Oncology Treatments.肿瘤治疗中离散选择实验的系统评价。
Patient. 2021 Nov;14(6):775-790. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00520-4. Epub 2021 May 5.
3
Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.澳大利亚公众对新医疗技术资金投入的偏好:离散选择法与轮廓案例最佳-最差尺度法的比较
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jul;34(5):638-54. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14526640. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
4
Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.患者和医疗服务提供者在治疗的哪些方面最为重要这一问题上是否存在不一致的偏好?来自离散选择实验系统评价的证据。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 17;7(5):e014719. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014719.
5
Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.作为离散选择实验中一个属性的风险:文献的系统综述
Patient. 2014;7(2):151-70. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0048-1.
6
One Method, Many Methodological Choices: A Structured Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments for Health State Valuation.一种方法,多种方法选择:健康状态估值离散选择实验的结构化综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Jan;37(1):29-43. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0714-6.
7
A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing.关于基因检测的离散选择实验和联合分析的系统评价。
Patient. 2022 Jan;15(1):39-54. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00531-1. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
8
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:文献综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Sep;32(9):883-902. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x.
9
Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments.患者对初级卫生保健的偏好——离散选择实验的系统文献综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2433-7.
10
A Systematic and Critical Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病中离散选择实验的系统评价和批判性回顾。
Patient. 2022 Jan;15(1):55-68. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00536-w. Epub 2021 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Expanding the use and interpretation of patient-centric cardiovascular clinical trial endpoints.扩大以患者为中心的心血管临床试验终点的应用和解读。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jul 3;9(1):e151. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.10054. eCollection 2025.
2
Preferences for Telephone Cancer Information and Support in People with Cancer and Carers: Attribute and Level Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment.癌症患者及其护理人员对电话癌症信息与支持的偏好:离散选择实验的属性及水平选择
Patient. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00746-6.
3
AQoLS-Brief: Development and psychometric properties of a short version of the alcohol quality of life scale.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for new medicines in rare disease patients and caregivers.量化罕见病患者及其护理人员对新药的获益-风险偏好。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 May 26;11(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0444-9.
2
Potential impact of the implementation of multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) on the Polish pricing and reimbursement process of orphan drugs.多标准决策分析(MCDA)的实施对波兰罕见病药物定价和报销流程的潜在影响。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 Mar 10;11:23. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0388-0.
3
The use of discrete choice experiments to inform health workforce policy: a systematic review.
《酒精生活质量量表简版(AQoLS-Brief):酒精生活质量量表简版的编制及心理测量学特性》
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 29;20(4):e0321365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321365. eCollection 2025.
4
The employment preferences of young people in Canada: a discrete choice experiment.加拿大年轻人的就业偏好:一项离散选择实验。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 21;25(1):715. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21515-y.
5
Patients' Preferences for the Treatment of a Single Missing Tooth in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.中国患者对单颗牙缺失治疗的偏好:一项离散选择实验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Dec 6;18:2455-2467. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S475061. eCollection 2024.
6
Incentivizing Rural Work Preferences Among Specialist Physicians: Protocol for a Discrete Choice Experiment.激励专科医生对农村工作的偏好:一项离散选择实验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Dec 9;13:e59621. doi: 10.2196/59621.
7
Eliciting parents' decision-making to antibiotic use for upper respiratory tract infections: A discrete choice experiment.探究家长对治疗上呼吸道感染使用抗生素的决策:一项离散选择实验。
J Glob Health. 2024 Dec 9;14:04220. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04220.
8
Women's preferences for caesarean or vaginal birth with a perspective of future fertility: A discrete choice experiment.女性对未来生育视角下剖宫产或阴道分娩的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 7;19(11):e0310560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310560. eCollection 2024.
9
Priorities for contraceptive method and service delivery attributes among adolescent girls and young women in Kenya: a qualitative study.肯尼亚少女和年轻女性对避孕方法及服务提供属性的优先选择:一项定性研究
Front Reprod Health. 2024 May 7;6:1360390. doi: 10.3389/frph.2024.1360390. eCollection 2024.
10
The preferences of people in Australia to respond and engage with advertisements to promote reproductive health: Results of a discrete choice experiment.澳大利亚人对促进生殖健康广告的回应和参与偏好:离散选择实验结果
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Feb 23;40:102657. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102657. eCollection 2024 Apr.
运用离散选择实验为卫生人力政策提供信息:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 1;14:367. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-367.
4
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:文献综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Sep;32(9):883-902. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x.
5
A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.系统评价报告公众对医疗保健优先排序的偏好的陈述性偏好研究。
Patient. 2014;7(4):365-86. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0063-2.
6
Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.澳大利亚公众对新医疗技术资金投入的偏好:离散选择法与轮廓案例最佳-最差尺度法的比较
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jul;34(5):638-54. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14526640. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
7
Yes, the government should tax soft drinks: findings from a citizens' jury in Australia.是的,政府应该对软饮料征税:澳大利亚公民陪审团的调查结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Feb 27;11(3):2456-71. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110302456.
8
A pilot study of multicriteria decision analysis for valuing orphan medicines.多准则决策分析在评估孤儿药价值中的初步研究。
Value Health. 2013 Dec;16(8):1163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
9
Assessing the value of symptom relief for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: willingness to pay using a discrete choice experiment.评估胃食管反流病治疗中症状缓解对患者的价值:使用离散选择实验进行意愿支付。
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):588-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 May 3.
10
Patient preferences for biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis: a discrete-choice experiment.类风湿关节炎患者对生物制剂的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):385-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.11.007.