Differential Diagnosis of Irritant Versus Allergic Contact Dermatitis Based on Noninvasive Methods.

INTRODUCTION

Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is characterized by direct injury to the epidermal cells, activating the innate immune response. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), in contrast, is delineated by a delayed hypersensitivity reaction of type IV. Despite the distinct etiopathogenic mechanisms under-pinning each condition, the differentiation between them presents a significant diagnostic challenge.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether a combination of clinical evaluation and noninvasive measurements-encompassing oxidative stress, erythema, hydration, melanin content, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), hemoglobin concentration, and skin texture and volume-could distinguish ICD from ACD.

METHODS

Two cohorts, each comprising 21 patients, were evaluated: one diagnosed with ICD and the other with ACD. All participants underwent biophysical and clinical assessments, along with Antera 3D evaluations. Tape strips were utilized for skin sampling, and oxidative stress levels were measured via fluorescence assessments.

RESULTS

ICD prompted an almost immediate inflammatory reaction (peaking at 24 hours), whereas ACD incited a delayed response (72 hours). Noninvasive evaluated parameters such as hemoglobin concentration, skin texture and volume, melanin content, erythema, and TEWL showed significant differences between the ICD and ACD cohorts (P < 0.05). The allergens amcinonide, nickel sulphate, cobalt chloride, budesonide, PPD, and thiuram mix were found to induce elevated levels of oxidative stress.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluation of patients with noninvasive parameters, including transepidermal water loss (TEWL), hemoglobin concentration, and skin texture and volume, could markedly aid in distinguishing irritant contact dermatitis from allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Nevertheless, the study was constrained by a limited sample size.