• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加速农业研发成果转化对全球粮食安全的影响。

Impacts of accelerating agricultural R&D transfer on global food security.

作者信息

Jin Yan, Kristkova Zuzana Smeets, Kardung Maximilian, Wesseler Justus

机构信息

Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.

Department of International Policy, Wageningen Economic Research, The Hague, Netherlands.

出版信息

GM Crops Food. 2024 Dec 31;15(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2024.2438419. Epub 2024 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1080/21645698.2024.2438419
PMID:39653389
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11633200/
Abstract

Postponing the adoption of genome editing (GE) is costly, with lengthy regulatory processes contributing to postponement. Accelerating agricultural research and development (R&D) transfer is important for stimulating sustainable agricultural transitions and enhancing global food security. Using the MAGNET model, we incorporate dynamic R&D accumulation and compare economic projections in scenarios with accelerated R&D transfer. We calculate the cost of delay (COD) from postponing GE adoption. The results show that accelerating R&D transfer in high-income countries impacts economic performance, welfare, and food affordability globally; the annuity of COD ranges from losses of -$1.1 billion (Brazil) to gains of $18.5 billion (Europe). A 3-year acceleration of R&D transfer in all countries benefits middle and low-income countries the most (e.g. China, India, other Asian countries, and Sub-Saharan African countries), with the annuity of COD ranging from -$4.8 billion (Brazil) to $83.9 billion (China). Therefore, streamlining the GE regulatory framework is essential for enhancing food security and global welfare.

摘要

推迟采用基因组编辑技术成本高昂,漫长的监管流程导致了这种推迟。加速农业研发成果转化对于推动可持续农业转型和加强全球粮食安全至关重要。我们使用MAGNET模型,纳入动态研发积累,并比较了研发加速转化情景下的经济预测。我们计算了推迟采用基因组编辑技术的延迟成本(COD)。结果表明,高收入国家加速研发转化会影响全球的经济表现、福利和食品可承受性;延迟成本的年金范围从-11亿美元(巴西)的损失到185亿美元(欧洲)的收益。所有国家研发转化加速3年对中低收入国家(如中国、印度、其他亚洲国家和撒哈拉以南非洲国家)益处最大,延迟成本的年金范围从-48亿美元(巴西)到839亿美元(中国)。因此,简化基因组编辑监管框架对于加强粮食安全和全球福利至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280e/11633200/2784bb85c564/KGMC_A_2438419_F0003b_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280e/11633200/09f27dd5c4dd/KGMC_A_2438419_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280e/11633200/1e5425995006/KGMC_A_2438419_F0002a_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280e/11633200/2abcb16acedf/KGMC_A_2438419_F0003a_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280e/11633200/02a6c4ba36fb/KGMC_A_2438419_F0002b_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280e/11633200/2784bb85c564/KGMC_A_2438419_F0003b_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280e/11633200/09f27dd5c4dd/KGMC_A_2438419_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280e/11633200/1e5425995006/KGMC_A_2438419_F0002a_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280e/11633200/2abcb16acedf/KGMC_A_2438419_F0003a_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280e/11633200/02a6c4ba36fb/KGMC_A_2438419_F0002b_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280e/11633200/2784bb85c564/KGMC_A_2438419_F0003b_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Impacts of accelerating agricultural R&D transfer on global food security.加速农业研发成果转化对全球粮食安全的影响。
GM Crops Food. 2024 Dec 31;15(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2024.2438419. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
2
Impact of transnational land acquisitions on local food security and dietary diversity.跨国土地收购对当地粮食安全和饮食多样性的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020535118.
3
Trade and commerce in improved crops and food: an essay on food security.改良作物和食品的贸易和商业:关于食品安全的论文。
N Biotechnol. 2010 Nov 30;27(5):623-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
4
Green Revolution research saved an estimated 18 to 27 million hectares from being brought into agricultural production.绿色革命研究使约 1800 万到 2700 万公顷的土地免于被投入农业生产。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 21;110(21):8363-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208065110. Epub 2013 May 13.
5
Genome Editing for Global Food Security.基因组编辑与全球粮食安全
Trends Biotechnol. 2018 Feb;36(2):123-127. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
6
Rapid delivery systems for future food security.面向未来粮食安全的快速运输系统。
Nat Biotechnol. 2021 Oct;39(10):1179-1181. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01079-z.
7
Agrochemical-free genetically modified and genome-edited crops: Towards achieving the United Nations sustainable development goals and a 'greener' green revolution.无农药基因改良和基因编辑作物:实现联合国可持续发展目标和“更绿色”的绿色革命。
J Biotechnol. 2024 Jun 20;389:68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2024.04.015. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
8
Agricultural biotechnology and smallholder farmers in developing countries.农业生物技术与发展中国家的小农户。
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012 Apr;23(2):278-85. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.11.020. Epub 2011 Dec 10.
9
Advancing irrigation management: integrating technology and sustainability to address global food security.推进灌溉管理:整合技术和可持续性,以解决全球粮食安全问题。
Environ Monit Assess. 2024 Oct 5;196(11):1018. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-13145-5.
10
The global income and production effects of genetically modified (GM) crops 1996-2011.1996-2011 年转基因作物的全球收入和生产效应。
GM Crops Food. 2013 Jan-Mar;4(1):74-83. doi: 10.4161/gmcr.24176. Epub 2013 Jan 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A global dataset of public agricultural R&D investment: 1960-2022.1960 - 2022年全球公共农业研发投资数据集
Sci Data. 2025 Jul 3;12(1):1140. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05331-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk-appropriate regulations for gene-editing technologies.风险适宜的基因编辑技术监管。
GM Crops Food. 2024 Dec 31;15(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2023.2293510. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
2
The legal aspect of the current use of genetically modified organisms in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda.肯尼亚、坦桑尼亚和乌干达目前使用转基因生物的法律方面。
GM Crops Food. 2023 Dec 31;14(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2023.2208999.
3
The economics and policy of genome editing in crop improvement.作物改良中的基因组编辑的经济学和政策。
Plant Genome. 2023 Jun;16(2):e20248. doi: 10.1002/tpg2.20248. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
4
The EU's GM crop conundrum: Did the EU policy strategy to convert EFSA GMO guidance into legislation deliver on its promises?: Did the EU policy strategy to convert EFSA GMO guidance into legislation deliver on its promises?欧盟的转基因作物难题:欧盟将 EFSA 转基因生物指导意见转化为立法的政策策略是否兑现了其承诺?
EMBO Rep. 2022 May 4;23(5):e54529. doi: 10.15252/embr.202154529. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
5
Food safety, food security and genetically modified organisms in Africa: a current perspective.非洲的食品安全、粮食安全和转基因生物:当前视角。
Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2021 Apr;37(1):30-63. doi: 10.1080/02648725.2021.1940735. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
6
The Cost of Postponement of Bt Rice Commercialization in China.中国推迟转基因抗虫水稻商业化的代价。
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Oct 8;10:1226. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01226. eCollection 2019.
7
Getting an Imported GM Crop Approved in China.在中国获得进口转基因作物的批准。
Trends Biotechnol. 2019 Jun;37(6):566-569. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
8
A comparison of the EU regulatory approach to directed mutagenesis with that of other jurisdictions, consequences for international trade and potential steps forward.比较欧盟对定向诱变的监管方法与其他司法管辖区的方法、对国际贸易的影响以及可能的前进步骤。
New Phytol. 2019 Jun;222(4):1673-1684. doi: 10.1111/nph.15627. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
9
EU court casts new plant breeding techniques into regulatory limbo.欧盟法院将新的植物育种技术置于监管的不确定状态。
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Sep 6;36(9):799-800. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4251.
10
Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996-2016: Impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions.1996-2016 年:转基因作物使用对农药使用和碳排放的环境影响。
GM Crops Food. 2018;9(3):109-139. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2018.1476792.