• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向通用人际信任的统一度量。

Towards a unified measure of general interpersonal trust.

作者信息

Hoang Uyen, Tanner Braden, Mahmoud-Elhaj Dana, Holt Jenna, Asif Muhammad, Feltz Adam

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Nov 22;10(23):e40624. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40624. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40624
PMID:39654742
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11626050/
Abstract

Trust is a well-studied attitude with many different conceptualizations, scales, and measurement techniques. However, the diversity of measurement and conceptualizations of trust can make comparisons between studies and instrument selection difficult. To help address these difficulties, we conducted 4 studies where we directly compared commonly used domain general trust measures. Study 1 ( = 155) compared 6 commonly used measures of trust (with a total of 10 factors reported in those measures) and submitted items in those scales to an exploratory factor analysis. We were able to identify 6 distinct, interpretable factors in those trust measures. Studies 2-4 ( 234, 166, 355) reduced the 6 factors to 4 that were consistent with the theoretical literature: Confidence in others, belief in others' reliability, belief in others' honesty, and beliefs about others' trustworthiness. Study 4 also suggested that the 4 trust factors were largely unrelated to sex, political orientation, and disgust sensitivity (discriminant validity). The 4 trust factors were associated with other, related factors such as the personality trait agreeableness (convergent validity). Some of the trust factors predicted decisions about acceptance of water recycling (predictive validity) and predicted that acceptance beyond what was predicted by disgust sensitivity, sex, and political orientation (incremental validity).

摘要

信任是一种经过充分研究的态度,有许多不同的概念化方式、量表和测量技术。然而,信任测量和概念化的多样性会使研究之间的比较以及工具选择变得困难。为了帮助解决这些困难,我们进行了4项研究,在这些研究中我们直接比较了常用的领域通用信任测量方法。研究1(n = 155)比较了6种常用的信任测量方法(这些测量方法总共报告了10个因素),并对这些量表中的项目进行了探索性因素分析。我们能够在这些信任测量方法中识别出6个不同的、可解释的因素。研究2 - 4(n分别为234、166、355)将这6个因素缩减为4个与理论文献一致的因素:对他人的信心、对他人可靠性的信念、对他人诚实的信念以及对他人可信赖性的信念。研究4还表明,这4个信任因素在很大程度上与性别、政治取向和厌恶敏感性无关(区分效度)。这4个信任因素与其他相关因素有关,如人格特质宜人性(聚合效度)。一些信任因素预测了对水回收利用的接受决策(预测效度),并且预测的接受程度超出了厌恶敏感性、性别和政治取向所预测的范围(增量效度)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9461/11626050/697940806e89/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9461/11626050/7868ae3c864c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9461/11626050/697940806e89/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9461/11626050/7868ae3c864c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9461/11626050/697940806e89/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Towards a unified measure of general interpersonal trust.迈向通用人际信任的统一度量。
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 22;10(23):e40624. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40624. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
2
Assessing Two Dimensions of Interpersonal Trust: Other-Focused Trust and Propensity to Trust.评估人际信任的两个维度:他人导向型信任和信任倾向。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 27;12:654735. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654735. eCollection 2021.
3
The Traits One Can Trust: Dissecting Reciprocity and Kindness as Determinants of Trustworthy Behavior.值得信赖的特质:剖析互惠与善良作为可信赖行为的决定因素
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Nov;41(11):1523-36. doi: 10.1177/0146167215600530. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
4
Theory of trust and acceptance of artificial intelligence technology (TrAAIT): An instrument to assess clinician trust and acceptance of artificial intelligence.信任和接受人工智能技术理论(TrAAIT):一种评估临床医生对人工智能信任和接受程度的工具。
J Biomed Inform. 2023 Dec;148:104550. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104550. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
5
Honesty-humility under threat: Self-uncertainty destroys trust among the nice guys.诚实谦逊受到威胁:自我不确定性破坏了好人之间的信任。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Jan;114(1):179-194. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000144. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
6
Neural representations of honesty predict future trust behavior.诚实的神经表示预测未来的信任行为。
Nat Commun. 2019 Nov 15;10(1):5184. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13261-8.
7
Who is trustworthy? Predicting trustworthy intentions and behavior.谁是值得信赖的?预测值得信赖的意图和行为。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Sep;115(3):468-494. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000136. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
8
Uncertainty about others' trustworthiness increases during adolescence and guides social information sampling.青少年时期对他人可信度的不确定性会增加,并指导社会信息采样。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 10;12(1):7634. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09477-2.
9
The Effects of Partner Extraversion and Agreeableness on Trust.伴侣的外向性和宜人性对信任的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Jul;49(7):1028-1042. doi: 10.1177/01461672221086768. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
10
A Model of Trust Processes in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review.边缘型人格障碍信任过程模型:系统综述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2023 Nov;25(11):555-567. doi: 10.1007/s11920-023-01468-y. Epub 2023 Oct 27.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review on the role of trust in the water governance literature.关于信任在水治理文献中作用的系统综述。
Water Res X. 2022 Jun 27;16:100147. doi: 10.1016/j.wroa.2022.100147. eCollection 2022 Aug 1.
2
Comparing effects of default nudges and informing on recycled water decisions.比较默认提示和告知对再生水决策的影响。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2022 Jun;28(2):399-411. doi: 10.1037/xap0000406. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
3
An Evaluation of Amazon's Mechanical Turk, Its Rapid Rise, and Its Effective Use.亚马逊土耳其机器人的评估、快速崛起及其有效应用。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;13(2):149-154. doi: 10.1177/1745691617706516.
4
Public responses to water reuse - Understanding the evidence.公众对水再利用的反应——理解证据。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Feb 1;207:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.021. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
5
A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation: Implications for Understanding Autonomy in Future Systems.影响自动化信任发展因素的元分析:对理解未来系统自主性的启示
Hum Factors. 2016 May;58(3):377-400. doi: 10.1177/0018720816634228. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?亚马逊土耳其机器人:一种新的廉价、高质量数据来源?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
7
How do you measure trust in the health system? A systematic review of the literature.如何衡量对医疗体系的信任?文献系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Aug;91:10-4. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 May 14.
8
Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers.亚马逊土耳其机器人工人的天真:对行为研究人员的后果和解决方案。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Mar;46(1):112-30. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7.
9
Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research.评估亚马逊土耳其机器人作为实验行为研究工具。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057410. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
10
Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk.在亚马逊的 Mechanical Turk 上进行行为研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):1-23. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6.