Block Susan
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2025 Feb;28(2):151-161. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2024.0366. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
The field of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (HPM) has its roots in the principles, promulgated by Dame Cicely Saunders, that patient and family are the unit of care and that comprehensive integration of physical, psychological, social, and spiritual care is necessary to address suffering in all its dimensions. Although we aspire to provide comprehensive care for our patients, most hospice and palliative care (HPM) physicians lack basic competencies for identifying and managing patients with psychological distress and mental health distress and disorders, a growing segment of our clinical population. In this article, I argue that we are not living up to the founding values of our field in how we practice, how we educate our trainees, our research, and in how we pursue our own professional development as faculty. The history of our field, the nature of our clinical workforce, the culture of PC, and our educational programs all contribute to our current practice model, which is not adequate to meet the mental health needs of our patients. I propose strategies to address these challenges focused on enhancing integration between psychiatry/psychology and HPM, changes in fellowship education and faculty development, addressing the stigma against people with mental health diagnoses, and addressing system and cultural challenges that limit our ability to provide the kind of comprehensive, integrative care that our field aspires to.
临终关怀与姑息医学(HPM)领域源于西塞莉·桑德斯女爵士所倡导的原则,即患者和家庭是照护单位,且必须全面整合身体、心理、社会和精神照护,以应对各个层面的痛苦。尽管我们渴望为患者提供全面照护,但大多数临终关怀与姑息治疗(HPM)医生缺乏识别和管理存在心理困扰、心理健康困扰及障碍患者的基本能力,而这类患者在我们的临床群体中所占比例日益增加。在本文中,我认为我们在临床实践方式、对实习生的教育方式、研究以及作为教员的自身职业发展方面,都未能践行本领域的创始价值观。我们领域的历史、临床工作队伍的性质、姑息治疗的文化以及我们的教育项目,都对我们当前的实践模式产生了影响,而这种模式不足以满足患者的心理健康需求。我提出应对这些挑战的策略,重点在于加强精神病学/心理学与HPM之间的整合、改变专科培训教育和教员发展、消除对患有精神疾病诊断者的污名化,以及应对限制我们提供本领域所期望的那种全面、综合照护能力的系统和文化挑战。