• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾结石分析:欧洲泌尿外科学会尿石症分会(EULIS)关于全球当前实践与观点的调查

Kidney stone analysis: an EAU section of urolithiasis (EULIS) survey on current practices and perspectives worldwide.

作者信息

Stoots Simone J M, Somani Bhaskar K, Durutovic Otas, Cavadas Vitor, Secker Armin, Jung Helene Ulrik, Ulvik Øyvind, Ingimarsson Johann, Tefik Tzevat, Sener Emre, Dragos Laurian, Tailly Thomas, Popiolek Marcin, Hamri Saeed Bin, Gauhar Vineet, M Zeeshan Hameed Belthangady, Rivas Juan Gomez, Bhojani Naeem, Seitz Christian, Beerlage Harrie, de Jonge Robert, Kamphuis Guido M

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2024 Dec 10;43(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05348-9.

DOI:
10.1007/s00345-024-05348-9
PMID:39656283
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the current thoughts and perspectives on kidney stone analysis amongst urologists and urology residents worldwide.

METHODS

In October 2022 an online survey supported by the EULIS was circulated amongst urologists and urology residents worldwide. The survey was based on the current EAU guidelines regarding stone analysis and its role in urolithiasis management. Responses were collected until February 2023.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 351 urologists (75.4%) and 115 urology residents (24.7%). 49.1% of the participants stated that performing kidney stone analysis was of utmost importance in every patient. 91.8% were of the opinion that stone analysis changes KSD management. 62.3% of the participants declared to adhere to the guidelines. 44.7% aim to perform stone analysis in first-time stone formers. 1 out of 11 does not send stones for kidney stone analysis at all. Urologists that pursued an additional endo-urology sub-specialism performed stone analysis more frequently compared to those who were not endo-urologists.

CONCLUSION

Although majority of urologists consider stone analysis an essential part of kidney stone management, in reality the practice patterns regarding stone analysis deviate from the EAU guidelines. Our aim should be to bridge the knowledge gap regarding stone analysis, foster collaboration to streamline logistics regarding stone analysis and enhance the quality of care we provide for kidney stone patients.

摘要

目的

调查全球泌尿外科医生和泌尿外科住院医师对肾结石分析的当前想法和观点。

方法

2022年10月,一项由欧洲泌尿外科学会(EULIS)支持的在线调查在全球泌尿外科医生和泌尿外科住院医师中展开。该调查基于欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)关于结石分析及其在尿石症管理中作用的现行指南。调查结果收集至2023年2月。

结果

351名泌尿外科医生(75.4%)和115名泌尿外科住院医师(24.7%)完成了调查。49.1%的参与者表示,对每位患者进行肾结石分析至关重要。91.8%的人认为结石分析会改变尿石症的管理。62.3%的参与者宣称遵守指南。44.7%的人旨在对首次患结石者进行结石分析。11人中就有1人根本不送检结石进行肾结石分析。与非内镜泌尿外科医生相比,从事额外内镜泌尿外科亚专业的泌尿外科医生更频繁地进行结石分析。

结论

尽管大多数泌尿外科医生认为结石分析是肾结石管理的重要组成部分,但实际上,关于结石分析的实践模式与欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)指南存在偏差。我们的目标应该是弥合关于结石分析的知识差距,促进合作以简化结石分析的物流流程,并提高我们为肾结石患者提供的护理质量。

相似文献

1
Kidney stone analysis: an EAU section of urolithiasis (EULIS) survey on current practices and perspectives worldwide.肾结石分析:欧洲泌尿外科学会尿石症分会(EULIS)关于全球当前实践与观点的调查
World J Urol. 2024 Dec 10;43(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05348-9.
2
Urologists' opinion on treating asymptomatic stones: Would we treat ourselves as we treat our patients? Survey from European Association of Urology, Young Academic Urologists, Endourology and Urolithiasis working party.泌尿科医生对治疗无症状结石的看法:我们会像治疗患者一样对待自己吗?来自欧洲泌尿外科学会、青年泌尿外科医生、内镜泌尿外科和尿石症工作组的调查。
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 Dec 7;54(1):185-193. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5779. eCollection 2024.
3
Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), regular and small sized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in daily practice: European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS) Survey.日常实践中的逆行性肾内手术(RIRS)、常规及小型经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL):欧洲泌尿外科学会尿石症分会(EULIS)调查
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2016 Oct 5;88(3):212-216. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2016.3.212.
4
Current practice patterns in the management of upper urinary tract calculi in the north central United States.美国中北部上尿路结石管理的当前实践模式
J Endourol. 2008 Apr;22(4):631-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0186.
5
Spoilt for Choice: A Survey of Current Practices of Surgical Urinary Stone Treatment and Adherence to Evidence-Based Guidelines among Swiss Urologists.选择过多:瑞士泌尿外科医生手术治疗尿路结石的当前实践及对循证指南遵循情况的调查
Urol Int. 2019;103(3):357-363. doi: 10.1159/000502806. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
6
Adherence to guidelines in the management of urolithiasis: are there differences among distinct patient care settings?在尿石症管理中遵循指南:不同的患者护理环境是否存在差异?
World J Urol. 2021 Aug;39(8):3079-3087. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03562-9. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
7
A Global Survey to Assess Urologists' Attitudes Towards Suction Technology in Endourology by the European Association of Urology Section of Endourology and Progressive Endourological Association for Research and Leading Solutions.欧洲泌尿外科学会腔内泌尿外科分会和渐进性腔内泌尿外科研究与领先解决方案协会开展的一项全球调查,以评估泌尿外科医生对腔内泌尿外科吸引技术的态度。
Urology. 2025 Mar;197:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.12.009. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
8
The stone surgeon in the mirror: how are German-speaking urologists treating large renal stones today?镜中的结石医生:如今德语国家的泌尿科医生如何治疗大肾结石?
World J Urol. 2018 Mar;36(3):467-473. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2148-8. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
9
Practice patterns in the treatment of large renal stones.大型肾结石治疗中的实践模式。
J Endourol. 2003 Aug;17(6):355-63. doi: 10.1089/089277903767923119.
10
Current practice patterns of urologists providing nutrition recommendations to patients with kidney stones.泌尿外科医生向肾结石患者提供营养建议的当前实践模式。
J Endourol. 2014 Sep;28(9):1127-31. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0164. Epub 2014 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of asymptomatic kidney stones on disease progression in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.无症状肾结石对常染色体显性遗传性多囊肾病疾病进展的影响。
BMC Nephrol. 2025 Feb 24;26(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-03979-7.

本文引用的文献

1
How Reliable Is Endoscopic Stone Recognition? A Comparison Between Visual Stone Identification and Formal Stone Analysis.内镜下结石识别的可靠性如何?视觉结石识别与正式结石分析的比较。
J Endourol. 2022 Oct;36(10):1362-1370. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0217. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
2
Risk factors for kidney stone disease recurrence: a comprehensive meta-analysis.肾结石病复发的风险因素:一项综合荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01017-4.
3
Practice patterns of kidney stone management across European and non-European centers: an in-depth investigation from the European Renal Stone Network (ERSN).
欧洲和非欧洲中心的肾结石管理实践模式:来自欧洲肾脏结石网络(ERSN)的深入调查。
J Nephrol. 2021 Aug;34(4):1337-1346. doi: 10.1007/s40620-020-00854-6. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Evaluation of the economic burden of kidney stone disease in the UK: a retrospective cohort study with a mean follow-up of 19 years.评估英国肾结石病的经济负担:一项平均随访时间为 19 年的回顾性队列研究。
BJU Int. 2020 Apr;125(4):586-594. doi: 10.1111/bju.14991. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
5
The Urological Association of Asia clinical guideline for urinary stone disease.亚洲泌尿外科学会泌尿系结石病临床诊疗指南。
Int J Urol. 2019 Jul;26(7):688-709. doi: 10.1111/iju.13957. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
6
Recurrence rates of urinary calculi according to stone composition and morphology.根据结石成分和形态的不同,尿石症的复发率。
Urolithiasis. 2018 Oct;46(5):459-470. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1043-0. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
7
Accurate stone analysis: the impact on disease diagnosis and treatment.精准的结石分析:对疾病诊断与治疗的影响。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Feb;45(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0943-0. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
8
Dietary and pharmacologic management to prevent recurrent nephrolithiasis in adults: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians.饮食和药物管理预防成人复发性肾结石:美国医师学院临床实践指南。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Nov 4;161(9):659-67. doi: 10.7326/M13-2908.
9
Prevalence of 24-hour urine collection in high risk stone formers.高危结石形成者 24 小时尿液收集的流行率。
J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):376-80. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.080. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
10
Quality control in urinary stone analysis: results of 44 ring trials (1980-2001).尿石分析中的质量控制:44次环形试验的结果(1980 - 2001年)
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2005;43(3):298-303. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2005.051.