Li Cynthia, Howard Sydney P, Rogers Charles R, Andrzejak Sydney, Gilbert Keon L, Watts Keith J, Bevel Malcolm S, Moody Myles D, Langston Marvin E, Doty Judah V, Toriola Adetunji T, Conwell Darwin, Moore Justin X
Center for Health Equity Transformation, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2449855. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.49855.
Health disparities among racial and ethnic minoritized populations, particularly for cancer mortality rates, remain a major public health concern. Men from underrepresented backgrounds (Black and Hispanic men, specifically) face the pervasive effects of discrimination in their daily lives, which also contribute to the complex associations among allostatic load (a marker of chronic stress), educational opportunities, and elevated risks of cancer mortality.
To elucidate the associations among educational attainment, allostatic load, and cancer mortality risk among men.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationally representative sample of approximately 5000 people across the US, from 1988 to 2010 linked with data from the National Death Index, which served as follow-up data for the cohort and was available through December 31, 2019. Participants included men aged 18 years and older. Data were analyzed from June to October 2024.
Allostatic load data were stratified by educational attainment levels, categorized as (1) less than high school education and (2) high school graduate and above. Allostatic load score was calculated as the sum of total abnormal biomarkers and health measures (9 total). Participants were considered to have high allostatic load if their score was 3 or more.
The primary outcome was cancer death. Weighted Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of cancer death between educational attainment and allostatic load (adjusted for age, income, and smoking status).
Among all 20 529 men (mean [SE] age, 41.00 [0.22] years), those with high AL and less than high school educational attainment had a greater than 4-fold increased risk of cancer mortality (unadjusted HR, 4.71; 95% CI, 3.36-6.60) compared with those with low allostatic load and a college degree or higher. Similarly, both Black men (HR, 4.19; 95% CI, 2.09-8.40) and White men (HR, 5.77; 95% CI, 4.06-8.20) with high allostatic load and less than high school educational attainment had higher risks for cancer death compared with race-specific counterparts with college education and low allostatic load. After adjustments for age, poverty-to-income ratio, smoking status, history of cancer, and ever congestive heart failure and heart attack, the associations were attenuated, but all men (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.15-2.47) and White men (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.16-2.85) still had greater than 50% increased risk of cancer death compared with men with college education and low allostatic load.
This study highlights the detrimental association of not attaining a high school degree, combined with high allostatic load as a marker of chronic stress, with cancer mortality. Efforts to promote educational attainment and address the underlying social determinants of health are imperative in reducing cancer disparities in this population.
少数族裔人群中的健康差异,尤其是癌症死亡率方面的差异,仍然是一个主要的公共卫生问题。来自代表性不足背景的男性(特别是黑人男性和西班牙裔男性)在日常生活中面临着普遍的歧视影响,这也导致了应激负荷(慢性压力的一个指标)、教育机会和癌症死亡风险升高之间的复杂关联。
阐明男性的教育程度、应激负荷和癌症死亡风险之间的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项对来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查数据的回顾性队列分析,该调查是一个全国代表性样本,涵盖了1988年至2010年期间美国约5000人,并与国家死亡指数数据相链接,国家死亡指数数据用作该队列的随访数据,截至2019年12月31日可用。参与者包括18岁及以上的男性。数据于2024年6月至10月进行分析。
应激负荷数据按教育程度分层,分为(1)高中以下学历和(2)高中及以上学历。应激负荷分数计算为总异常生物标志物和健康指标(共9项)的总和。如果参与者的分数为3分或更高,则被认为具有高应激负荷。
主要结局是癌症死亡。采用加权Cox比例风险模型来估计教育程度和应激负荷之间癌症死亡的调整后风险比(HR)(根据年龄、收入和吸烟状况进行调整)。
在所有20529名男性(平均[标准误]年龄,41.00[0.22]岁)中,与低应激负荷且拥有大学学位或更高学历的男性相比,高应激负荷且高中以下学历的男性癌症死亡风险增加了4倍多(未调整的HR,4.71;95%置信区间,3.36 - 6.60)。同样,与接受大学教育且应激负荷低的同种族男性相比,高应激负荷且高中以下学历的黑人男性(HR,4.19;95%置信区间,2.09 - 8.40)和白人男性(HR,5.77;95%置信区间,4.06 - 8.20)患癌症死亡的风险更高。在对年龄、贫困收入比、吸烟状况、癌症病史以及既往充血性心力衰竭和心脏病发作进行调整后,这种关联有所减弱,但与接受大学教育且应激负荷低的男性相比,所有男性(HR,1.69;95%置信区间,1.15 - 2.47)和白人男性(HR,1.82;95%置信区间,1.16 - 2.85)的癌症死亡风险仍增加了50%以上。
本研究强调了未获得高中学历以及高应激负荷(作为慢性压力的一个指标)与癌症死亡之间的有害关联。努力提高教育程度并解决健康的潜在社会决定因素对于减少该人群的癌症差异至关重要。