Cardoso Barbara Rita, Liu Junxiu, Machado Priscila, Kwon Dayoon, Belsky Daniel W, Martinez Steele Euridice
Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC 3168, Australia.
Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.
Age Ageing. 2024 Nov 28;53(12). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae268.
The association between ultra-processed food (UPF) intake and markers of biological ageing has been scarcely investigated, despite the evident adverse health effects associated with UPF. This study aimed to test the association between UPF intake and biological ageing, and evaluate how much of this association is accounted for by overall diet quality.
This cross-sectional study assessed 16 055 participants aged 20-79 years (51% women, 46 ± 0.3 years) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2010. Dietary UPF intake was assessed using the Nova system. Values were expressed as % of total energy intake and were denominated as a continuous variable and in quintiles. Diet quality was assessed with the American Heart Association 2020 and the Healthy Eating Index 2015. Biological ageing was assessed using the PhenoAge algorithm.
For each 10% of energy intake accounted for by UPF, participants were 0.21 (95%CI 0.16-0.26) years biologically older in terms of PhenoAge. As compared to participants in the lowest UPF quintile (≤39%), those in the highest UPF quintile (68-100%) were 0.86 (95% CI 0.55, 1.16) years older (P-for-trend across quintiles ≤0.001). Adherence to a healthy diet moderately attenuated the relationship between UPF and PhenoAge (adjusted β = 0.14 per 10% increment of UPF).
Adults with higher UPF tended to be biologically older. This association is partly independent of diet quality, suggesting that food processing may contribute to biological ageing acceleration. Our findings point to a compelling reason to target UPF consumption to promote healthier ageing.
尽管超加工食品(UPF)明显具有不良健康影响,但关于其摄入量与生物衰老标志物之间的关联却鲜有研究。本研究旨在检验UPF摄入量与生物衰老之间的关联,并评估这种关联在多大程度上可由总体饮食质量来解释。
这项横断面研究评估了2003 - 2010年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)中的16055名年龄在20 - 79岁之间的参与者(51%为女性,年龄46±0.3岁)。使用诺瓦系统评估饮食中UPF的摄入量。数值以占总能量摄入的百分比表示,并作为连续变量和五分位数进行划分。饮食质量通过美国心脏协会2020年标准和2015年健康饮食指数进行评估。使用PhenoAge算法评估生物衰老情况。
就PhenoAge而言,UPF占能量摄入的比例每增加10%,参与者的生物年龄就会增加0.21岁(95%置信区间0.16 - 0.26)。与UPF摄入量最低五分位数(≤39%)的参与者相比,UPF摄入量最高五分位数(68 - 100%)的参与者年龄大0.86岁(95%置信区间0.55,1.16)(五分位数间趋势P值≤0.001)。坚持健康饮食适度减弱了UPF与PhenoAge之间的关系(UPF每增加10%,调整后的β值为0.14)。
UPF摄入量较高的成年人往往生物年龄更大。这种关联部分独立于饮食质量,表明食品加工可能会加速生物衰老。我们的研究结果指出了一个令人信服的理由,即针对UPF的消费采取措施以促进更健康的衰老。