Hague Leah, Barry Michael, Mowbray Paula K, Wilkinson Adrian, Avgar Ariel
Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York State, USA.
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 5;39(4):518-530. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2023-0353.
We aim to advance our understanding by examining voices related to employees' own interests and associated outcomes for employees and healthcare organizations. Patient safety reviews do not explore contextual factors such as organizational or professional cultures and regulatory environments in depth, and arguments for overcoming barriers to voice in health are underdeveloped. The research has largely developed in separate literature (various subdisciplines of management and the health field), and we outline the divergent emphases and opportunities for integration with the aim of investigating all relevant contextual factors and providing guidance on best practice informed by multiple disciplines.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A systematic approach was taken to gathering and reviewing articles, and coding and reporting are in line with the most recent Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (Rethlefsen ., 2021).
We identified a range of facilitators, barriers and outcomes of employee interest voice at different levels (organizational, leadership, team or individual) in a healthcare context. We identify various theoretical, methodological and knowledge gaps, and we suggest several ways in which these can be addressed in future research efforts.
We make multiple contributions to both theory and practice, including highlighting the importance and implications of integrating disciplinary approaches, broadening context, improving research design and exploring under-researched samples and topics. This information is essential in providing a more comprehensive model of healthcare voice and to shifting management focus to include all forms of employee voice in healthcare for the benefit of staff and patients.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: We make multiple contributions to both theory and practice including highlighting the importance of integrating disciplinary approaches, broadening context to include employee interest issues, improving research design and exploring under-researched samples and topics. This information is essential in providing a more comprehensive model of health care voice and to shifting management focus to take a more inclusive view of employee voice in healthcare for the benefit of staff as well as patients.
我们旨在通过审视与员工自身利益相关的声音以及员工和医疗保健组织的相关结果来增进理解。患者安全审查并未深入探究组织文化、专业文化和监管环境等背景因素,且关于克服健康领域发声障碍的论点尚不完善。该研究主要在不同的文献(管理和健康领域的各个子学科)中发展,我们概述了不同的重点以及整合的机会,目的是调查所有相关的背景因素,并提供多学科最佳实践指导。
设计/方法/途径:采用系统的方法收集和审查文章,编码和报告符合最新的系统评价和元分析首选报告项目声明(Rethlefsen等,2021年)。
我们确定了医疗保健背景下不同层面(组织、领导、团队或个人)员工利益发声的一系列促进因素、障碍和结果。我们识别了各种理论、方法和知识差距,并提出了在未来研究工作中解决这些问题的几种方法。
我们在理论和实践方面都做出了多项贡献,包括强调整合学科方法的重要性和意义、拓宽背景、改进研究设计以及探索研究不足的样本和主题。这些信息对于提供更全面的医疗保健发声模型以及将管理重点转向包括医疗保健中所有形式的员工发声以造福员工和患者至关重要。
原创性/价值:我们在理论和实践方面都做出了多项贡献,包括强调整合学科方法的重要性、拓宽背景以纳入员工利益问题、改进研究设计以及探索研究不足的样本和主题。这些信息对于提供更全面的医疗保健发声模型以及将管理重点转向更包容地看待医疗保健中的员工发声以造福员工和患者至关重要。