Epistaxis Risk in Patients Treated With Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Versus Oral Anticoagulation.

INTRODUCTION

Anticoagulants (AC) are associated with epistaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a treatment that allows AF patients to stop AC. The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk of developing epistaxis following LAAO versus direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and warfarin.

METHODS

This study uses the TriNetX database as well as institutional records. The TriNetX database was searched for AF patients on a DOAC, warfarin, or treated with LAAO. Epistaxis odds ratios were compared 1 day-6 months and 6 months-3 years following initiation of DOAC, warfarin, or LAAO. Records of LAAO patients at our institution were also reviewed.

RESULTS

The TriNetX query returned 1,185,862 patients. On TriNetX, LAAO patients had significantly higher odds of epistaxis likely due to antiplatelet therapy from 1 day-6 months compared to warfarin patients with DOAC patients (p < 0.0001). From 6 months-3 years after treatment initiation, LAAO patients experience reduced odds of epistaxis and epistaxis requiring nasal packing compared to warfarin patients (OR: 0.69 p = 0.0003; OR: 0.58 p = 0.0043). Institutionally, epistaxis resolved in 66% (8/12) LAAO patients with a history of epistaxis with an average follow-up of 1.5 years.

DISCUSSION

LAAO decreased the frequency of epistaxis and epistaxis requiring nasal packing in AF patients on warfarin after 6 months. Our institutional experience demonstrates long-term improvement in epistaxis after LAAO for DOAC and warfarin patients. Additional studies need to be performed to account for dual antiplatelet following LAAO on epistaxis risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 135:1636-1641, 2025.