Jain Tithi, Rahij Hasan, Hilal Zaib, Anwar Rahij
Trauma and Orthopaedics, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, GBR.
Orthopaedics, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, GBR.
Cureus. 2024 Nov 10;16(11):e73392. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73392. eCollection 2024 Nov.
Background The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the rapid adoption of telemedicine across medical specialties, including orthopedics. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction with orthopedic telemedicine consultations and analyze the efficiency and limitations of this approach during the pandemic. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted involving 522 patients who underwent telephone consultations for orthopedic care between May 2020 and January 2021. Consultations were performed by a single surgeon using the electronic software 'Proxima' and self-designed Microsoft Word templates for documentation. Patient satisfaction was assessed at the end of each consultation. Data on consultation duration, documentation time, the need for face-to-face follow-up, and the impact on surgical decision-making were collected. Results The overall patient satisfaction rate with telemedicine consultations was 77.9%. However, 65.3% of patients required subsequent face-to-face assessment, primarily for physical examination (48.2%) or discussion of investigation results (13.4%). Among 88 patients already listed for surgery, 38.6% chose to delay their operations due to COVID-19 concerns. The average telephone consultation duration was 4.9 minutes (range: 2-16 minutes), with 86.7% of clinical documentation completed in less than 5 minutes. Patients who had surgery and did not experience any complications exhibited the highest level of satisfaction at 92.3%. Conclusions The research we conducted provides evidence that telemedicine can be useful in the management of orthopedic patients, especially those who have undergone surgery. Nevertheless, continued face-to-face evaluation remains vital in orthopedics due to its high rates of necessity. The use of electronic templates and software for documentation proved to be highly efficient, significantly reducing the time required for clinical documentation and potentially allowing for more patient interactions. As health systems progress with advances made possible by pandemics and other future challenges, it is likely that an ideal combination of remote delivery via telemedicine and traditional means will be a safer, more effective, and efficient way of providing orthopedic services.
新冠疫情促使包括骨科在内的各个医学专科迅速采用远程医疗。本研究旨在评估患者对骨科远程医疗会诊的满意度,并分析疫情期间这种方式的效率和局限性。方法:进行了一项横断面调查,涉及2020年5月至2021年1月期间接受骨科护理电话会诊的522名患者。会诊由一名外科医生使用电子软件“Proxima”和自行设计的Microsoft Word模板进行记录。在每次会诊结束时评估患者满意度。收集会诊时长、记录时间、面对面随访需求以及对手术决策影响的数据。结果:远程医疗会诊的总体患者满意度为77.9%。然而,65.3%的患者需要后续面对面评估,主要是为了进行体格检查(48.2%)或讨论检查结果(13.4%)。在已列入手术名单的88名患者中,38.6%因担心新冠疫情而选择推迟手术。电话会诊的平均时长为4.9分钟(范围:2 - 16分钟),86.7%的临床记录在不到5分钟内完成。接受手术且未出现任何并发症的患者满意度最高,为92.3%。结论:我们进行的研究表明,远程医疗在骨科患者管理中可能有用,尤其是对已接受手术的患者。然而,由于面对面评估的必要性很高,在骨科中持续进行面对面评估仍然至关重要。事实证明,使用电子模板和软件进行记录非常高效,显著减少了临床记录所需时间,并可能增加与患者的互动。随着卫生系统因疫情及未来其他挑战带来的进展而不断发展,远程医疗的远程服务与传统方式的理想结合可能是提供骨科服务更安全、更有效且高效的方式。