Suppr超能文献

用于复发性大量心包积液的输液港:一例病例报告。

An infusion port for recurrent massive pericardial effusion: a case report.

作者信息

Zhao Yuechen, He Ying, Zou Fengwei, Hou Xiaofeng

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Nanjing Medical University First Clinical Medical College, 21008 Nanjing, China.

Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 210008 Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024 Nov 18;8(12):ytae610. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae610. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with recurrent massive pericardial effusion are at risk of recurrent cardiac tamponade. The current standard of care includes repeat pericardiocentesis or pericardial window when recurrent effusions cause haemodynamic compromise. Here, we report a case of a patient in whom an infusion port was used for drainage of recurrent pericardial effusion. Patient was followed up for 10 months demonstrating convenience and safety of use without evidence of cardiac tamponade.

CASE SUMMARY

We present a patient with recurrent massive pericardial effusion after previously undergoing two difficult pericardiocenteses of posteriorly located pericardial effusion causing tamponade. An infusion port was implanted and periodical follow-up and drainage through the port were performed. During follow-up, there was no evidence of tamponade caused by recurrence of pericardial effusion and no complications from the port.

DISCUSSION

Pericardiocentesis can be challenging in certain circumstances such as loculated or posteriorly located pericardial effusion. For patients with recurrent effusion, there is an incremental risk of serious complications with every pericardiocentesis. This case illustrates the feasibility of using an infusion port in recurrent pericardial effusion. After subcutaneous implantation of the infusion port, repeat pericardiocentesis and its related complications were avoided. Later pericardial decompression and intrapericardial administration of medications were simple and safe by accessing the port top.

摘要

背景

复发性大量心包积液患者有复发性心脏压塞的风险。当前的治疗标准包括在复发性积液导致血流动力学受损时重复进行心包穿刺或心包开窗术。在此,我们报告一例使用输液港引流复发性心包积液的患者。对该患者进行了10个月的随访,结果显示使用方便且安全,未出现心脏压塞的迹象。

病例摘要

我们介绍一名患者,其先前因后部心包积液导致心脏压塞而进行了两次困难的心包穿刺,之后出现复发性大量心包积液。植入了一个输液港,并通过该输液港进行定期随访和引流。在随访期间,没有证据表明心包积液复发导致心脏压塞,且输液港未出现并发症。

讨论

在某些情况下,如局限性或后部心包积液,心包穿刺可能具有挑战性。对于复发性积液患者,每次心包穿刺出现严重并发症的风险都会增加。本病例说明了在复发性心包积液中使用输液港的可行性。在皮下植入输液港后,避免了重复心包穿刺及其相关并发症。后来通过输液港顶部进行心包减压和心包内给药简单且安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15aa/11630024/fb5379137085/ytae610f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验