Diachuk Maksym, Easa Said M
Department of Civil Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON M5B2K3, Canada.
Fundam Res. 2023 Dec 20;4(5):1047-1062. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2023.10.015. eCollection 2024 Sep.
The study considers issues of elaborating and validating a technique of autonomous vehicle motion planning based on sequential trajectory and speed optimization. This method includes components such as representing sought-for functions by finite elements (FE), vehicle kinematic model, sequential quadratic programming for nonlinear constrained optimization, and Gaussian N-point quadrature integration. The primary novelty consists of using the inverse approach for obtaining vehicle trajectory and speed. The curvature and speed are represented by integrated polynomials to reduce the number of unknowns. For this, piecewise functions with two and three degrees of freedom (DOF) are implemented through FE nodal parameters. The technique ensures higher differentiability compared to the needed in the geometric and kinematic equations. Thus, the generated reference curves are characterized by simple and unambiguous forms. The latter fits best the control accuracy and efficiency during the motion tracking phase. Another advantage is replacing the nodal linear equality constraints with integral nonlinear ones. This ensures the non-violation of boundary limits within each FE and not only in nodes. The optimization technique implies that the spatial and time variables must be found separately and staged. The trajectory search is accomplished in the restricted allowable zone composed by superposing an area inside the external and internal boundaries, based on keeping safe distances, excluding areas for moving obstacles. Thus, this study compares two models that use two and three nodal DOF on optimization quality, stability, and rapidity in real-time applications. The simulation example shows numerous graph results of geometric and kinematic parameters with smoothed curves up to the highest derivatives. Finally, the conclusions are made on the efficiency and quality of prognosis, outlining the similarities and differences between the two applied models.
该研究考虑了基于连续轨迹和速度优化来阐述和验证自动驾驶车辆运动规划技术的问题。这种方法包括通过有限元(FE)表示所需函数、车辆运动学模型、用于非线性约束优化的序列二次规划以及高斯N点求积积分等组件。主要的新颖之处在于使用逆方法来获得车辆轨迹和速度。曲率和速度由积分多项式表示,以减少未知数的数量。为此,通过有限元节点参数实现具有两个和三个自由度(DOF)的分段函数。与几何和运动学方程所需的相比,该技术确保了更高的可微性。因此,生成的参考曲线具有简单明确的形式。这在运动跟踪阶段最适合控制精度和效率。另一个优点是用积分非线性约束代替节点线性等式约束。这确保了不仅在节点处,而且在每个有限元内都不会违反边界限制。优化技术意味着必须分别并分阶段找到空间和时间变量。轨迹搜索是在通过叠加外部和内部边界内的区域组成的受限允许区域内完成的,基于保持安全距离,排除移动障碍物的区域。因此,本研究比较了在实时应用中使用两个和三个节点自由度对优化质量、稳定性和快速性的两个模型。仿真示例展示了几何和运动学参数的大量图形结果,包括高达最高导数的平滑曲线。最后,对预后的效率和质量得出结论,概述了两个应用模型之间的异同。