• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童使用肾上腺素与多巴胺的比较:当前证据及我们的需求是什么?一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Epinephrine Versus Dopamine in Children, What Is the Current Evidence and What Do We Need? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Loomba Rohit S, Patel Riddhi D, Villarreal Enrique G, Farias Juan S, Flores Saul

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care (RSL, RDP), Advocate Children's Hospital, Oak Lawn, IL.

Department of Pediatrics (RSL), Chicago Medical School/Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Dec;29(6):578-586. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.6.578. Epub 2024 Dec 9.

DOI:10.5863/1551-6776-29.6.578
PMID:39659853
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11627570/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric patients often receive vasoactive agents following cardiothoracic surgery or when in shock. The use of vasoactive agents varies between different settings and has largely changed because of anecdotal observations or small observational studies. Although vasoactive agents are frequently used, there are limited studies in pediatric populations comparing them to one another. The purpose of this systematic review is to quantify the comparative effects of epinephrine and dopamine while identifying gaps in knowledge.

METHODS

A systematic review of published manuscripts was completed to identify full-text manuscripts in English using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Studies were included if they included clinical data using dopamine and epinephrine in different patients and included data for the same end points for patients receiving epinephrine or dopamine.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies with 397 patients were included. Of the included patients, 187 received epinephrine and 210 received dopamine. The mean age for all the patients was 45 months. When all patient data were pooled, a significantly lower mortality was associated with epinephrine compared with dopamine (risk ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-0.99). When only neonatal data were pooled, epinephrine was associated with a significantly higher average heart rate (10 bpm; 95% CI, 2.0-18.7) and a significantly lower average mean arterial blood pressure (-2.5 mm Hg; 95% CI, -4.6 to -0.4).

CONCLUSION

Limited data are available comparing dopamine to epinephrine in pediatric patients. The -available data demonstrate an apparent mortality benefit associated with the use of epinephrine.

摘要

引言

小儿患者在心胸外科手术后或休克时经常接受血管活性药物治疗。血管活性药物的使用在不同情况下有所不同,并且由于轶事观察或小型观察性研究,其使用情况已发生很大变化。尽管血管活性药物经常被使用,但在儿科人群中比较它们之间效果的研究有限。本系统评价的目的是量化肾上腺素和多巴胺的比较效果,同时找出知识空白。

方法

完成了对已发表手稿的系统评价,以使用PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库识别英文全文手稿。如果研究包括在不同患者中使用多巴胺和肾上腺素的临床数据,并且包括接受肾上腺素或多巴胺的患者相同终点的数据,则纳入研究。

结果

共纳入5项研究,397例患者。在纳入的患者中,187例接受肾上腺素,210例接受多巴胺。所有患者的平均年龄为45个月。当汇总所有患者数据时,与多巴胺相比,肾上腺素相关的死亡率显著降低(风险比,0.74;95%CI,0.55-0.99)。仅汇总新生儿数据时,肾上腺素与显著更高的平均心率(10次/分钟;95%CI,2.0-18.7)和显著更低的平均动脉血压(-2.5 mmHg;95%CI,-4.6至-0.4)相关。

结论

在儿科患者中比较多巴胺和肾上腺素的数据有限。现有数据表明使用肾上腺素具有明显的死亡率益处。

相似文献

1
Epinephrine Versus Dopamine in Children, What Is the Current Evidence and What Do We Need? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.儿童使用肾上腺素与多巴胺的比较:当前证据及我们的需求是什么?一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Dec;29(6):578-586. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.6.578. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
2
OUTCOMES OF PEDIATRIC FLUID-REFRACTORY SEPTIC SHOCK ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT VASOACTIVE STRATEGIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.根据不同的血管活性策略治疗小儿难治性脓毒性休克的结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Shock. 2024 Nov 1;62(5):599-611. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002427. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The efficacy of dopamine versus epinephrine for pediatric or neonatal septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.多巴胺与肾上腺素治疗儿童或新生儿感染性休克的疗效比较:随机对照研究的荟萃分析。
Ital J Pediatr. 2020 Jan 14;46(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13052-019-0768-x.
5
Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Dopamine Versus Epinephrine as First-Line Vasoactive Drugs in Pediatric Septic Shock.多巴胺与肾上腺素治疗儿童感染性休克一线血管活性药物的双盲前瞻性随机对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2292-302. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001260.
6
Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome.用于治疗心源性休克或低心排血量综合征的正性肌力药物和血管扩张剂策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11(11):CD009669. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009669.pub4.
7
Epinephrine versus dopamine in neonatal septic shock: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.肾上腺素与多巴胺在新生儿感染性休克中的应用:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Sep;177(9):1335-1342. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3195-x. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
8
Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Dopamine and Epinephrine in Pediatric Fluid-Refractory Hypotensive Septic Shock.比较多巴胺和肾上腺素用于小儿液体难治性低血压性感染性休克的双盲随机临床试验
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Nov;17(11):e502-e512. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000954.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF VASOPRESSORS FOR SEPTIC SHOCK PATIENTS: A SYSTEMIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS.血管加压药治疗脓毒性休克患者的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Shock. 2023 Dec 1;60(6):746-752. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002193. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

本文引用的文献

1
The acute influence of vasopressin on hemodynamic status and tissue oxygenation following the Norwood procedure.血管加压素对诺伍德手术后血流动力学状态和组织氧合的急性影响。
JTCVS Open. 2022 Jan 22;9:217-224. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.01.008. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Acute Effects of Vasopressin Arginine Infusion in Children with Congenital Heart Disease: Higher Blood Pressure Does Not Equal Improved Systemic Oxygen Delivery.血管加压素精氨酸输注对先天性心脏病儿童的急性影响:血压升高并不等同于全身氧输送改善。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2021 Dec;42(8):1792-1798. doi: 10.1007/s00246-021-02667-1. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
3
Clinical outcome of children with fluid-refractory septic shock treated with dopamine or epinephrine. A retrospective study at a pediatric emergency department in Argentina.在阿根廷的一家儿科急诊中心,对多巴胺或肾上腺素治疗无效的脓毒性休克患儿的临床结局进行回顾性研究。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2020 Oct-Dec;32(4):551-556. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20200092.
4
Effects of Vasopressin Infusion After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-analysis.血管加压素输注对小儿心脏手术后的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2021 Feb;42(2):225-233. doi: 10.1007/s00246-020-02496-8. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
5
Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children.《拯救脓毒症运动:儿童脓毒性休克及脓毒症相关器官功能障碍管理国际指南》
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;21(2):e52-e106. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002198.
6
The efficacy of dopamine versus epinephrine for pediatric or neonatal septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.多巴胺与肾上腺素治疗儿童或新生儿感染性休克的疗效比较:随机对照研究的荟萃分析。
Ital J Pediatr. 2020 Jan 14;46(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13052-019-0768-x.
7
The effect of milrinone on hemodynamic and gas exchange parameters in children.米力农对儿童血流动力学和气体交换参数的影响。
Cardiol Young. 2020 Jan;30(1):55-61. doi: 10.1017/S1047951119002865. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
8
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
9
Use of vasoactive agents in postoperative pediatric cardiac patients: Insights from a national database.血管活性药物在小儿心脏术后患者中的应用:来自全国数据库的见解
Congenit Heart Dis. 2019 Nov;14(6):1176-1184. doi: 10.1111/chd.12837. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
10
Epinephrine versus dopamine in neonatal septic shock: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.肾上腺素与多巴胺在新生儿感染性休克中的应用:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Sep;177(9):1335-1342. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3195-x. Epub 2018 Jun 23.