• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丙泊酚与环丙泊酚对门诊宫腔镜手术患者术后恶心呕吐影响的比较

Comparison of the Effects of Ciprofol and Propofol on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Hysteroscopy.

作者信息

Zhang Huaming, Zhang Min, Hao Lina, Li Qianqian, Li Qijian, Yang Jia, Xie Yanhu

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024 Dec 5;18:5701-5707. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S489223. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S489223
PMID:39659951
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11628403/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the effects of ciprofol and propofol on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing outpatient hysteroscopy.

DESIGN

Double-blind randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

This study included 1104 patients scheduled for elective outpatient hysteroscopy. Patients were randomly grouped to ciprofol Group (Group C, n = 539) and propofol Group (Group P, n = 547). Anesthesia was induced by sufentanil 0.1 ug/kg combined with ciprofol 0.3mg/kg or propofol 2.5mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained by ciprofol 1 to 1.5mg/kg/h or propofol 3 to 5mg/kg/h. The primary outcome of the study was PONV after surgery 1h and 24h. Secondary outcomes included heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), SpO before anesthesia (T1), 3 min after anesthesia (T2) and at the end of surgery (T3); the time of consciousness loss, recovery, hysteroscopy and discharge; and the incidence of adverse drug reactions such as hypotension, respiratory depression, bradycardia and injection pain was recorded in the two groups.

RESULTS

Compared with group P, MAP and SpO2 at T2 were significantly increased in group C (<0.05). Although there was no significant difference in the incidence of PONV at 1h and 24h after surgery between 2 groups ( > 0.05), the incidence of hypotension, injection pain and respiratory depression in group C were significantly reduced, compared with group P. (<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with propofol, ciprofol has a similar incidence of PONV and lower adverse effects such as hypotension, injection pain and respiratory depression in outpatient hysteroscopy.

摘要

目的

评估并比较环泊酚与丙泊酚对门诊宫腔镜手术患者术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的影响。

设计

双盲随机对照试验。

方法

本研究纳入1104例计划行择期门诊宫腔镜手术的患者。患者被随机分为环泊酚组(C组,n = 539)和丙泊酚组(P组,n = 547)。麻醉诱导采用舒芬太尼0.1μg/kg联合环泊酚0.3mg/kg或丙泊酚2.5mg/kg。麻醉维持采用环泊酚1至1.5mg/kg/h或丙泊酚3至5mg/kg/h。本研究的主要结局是术后1小时和24小时的PONV。次要结局包括心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、麻醉前(T1)、麻醉后3分钟(T2)及手术结束时(T3)的血氧饱和度(SpO₂);意识消失、恢复、宫腔镜手术及出院时间;记录两组低血压、呼吸抑制、心动过缓和注射痛等药物不良反应的发生率。

结果

与P组相比,C组T2时的MAP和SpO₂显著升高(<0.05)。虽然两组术后1小时和24小时PONV的发生率无显著差异(>0.05),但与P组相比,C组低血压、注射痛和呼吸抑制的发生率显著降低(<0.05)。

结论

在门诊宫腔镜手术中,与丙泊酚相比,环泊酚的PONV发生率相似,且低血压、注射痛和呼吸抑制等不良反应更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c92/11628403/3753467992a8/DDDT-18-5701-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c92/11628403/3753467992a8/DDDT-18-5701-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c92/11628403/3753467992a8/DDDT-18-5701-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Effects of Ciprofol and Propofol on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Hysteroscopy.丙泊酚与环丙泊酚对门诊宫腔镜手术患者术后恶心呕吐影响的比较
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024 Dec 5;18:5701-5707. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S489223. eCollection 2024.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol for Sedation/Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Hysteroscopy: A Randomized, Parallel-Group, Controlled Trial.西普罗尔在宫腔镜检查患者镇静/麻醉中的疗效和安全性:一项随机、平行组、对照试验。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2023 Jun 11;17:1707-1717. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S414243. eCollection 2023.
3
The efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol in patients undergoing painless hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.西普罗与异丙酚用于无痛宫腔镜检查患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 12;24(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02787-0.
4
Effects of Esketamine Combined with Propofol for Hysteroscopy Anesthesia on Patient Hemodynamics and Adverse Reactions.依托咪酯复合丙泊酚用于宫腔镜麻醉对患者血流动力学及不良反应的影响。
Altern Ther Health Med. 2024 Jan;30(1):18-23.
5
Bispectral Index-Monitored Anesthesia Induction in Older Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery: Comparing Ciprofol and Propofol in a Prospective, Single-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study.在接受择期手术的老年患者中进行脑电双频指数监测麻醉诱导:一项前瞻性、单中心、双盲、随机对照研究比较丙泊酚和七氟醚。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024 Nov 5;18:4993-5003. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S484532. eCollection 2024.
6
The potency-ratio of ciprofol and propofol under procedural sedation and anesthesia for outpatient hysteroscopy during cervical dilation: a study using up-and-down sequential allocation method.在宫颈扩张期间行门诊宫腔镜检查时,使用序贯上下法评估丙泊酚与西米普罗的麻醉效能比。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 26;24(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02793-2.
7
Safety and efficacy analysis of ciprofol combined with low-dose alfentanil in sedation of patients during transesophageal echocardiography: a randomized double-blind controlled study.丙泊酚联合小剂量阿芬太尼在经食管超声心动图检查中对患者镇静的安全性和有效性分析:一项随机双盲对照研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2025 Mar;41(3):397-402. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2025.2487102. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
8
The effects of ciprofol on haemodynamics under general anaesthesia during thoracoscopic surgery: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial.丙泊酚对胸腔镜手术全身麻醉期间血流动力学的影响:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03054-6.
9
Postoperative quality of recovery comparison between ciprofol and propofol in total intravenous anesthesia for elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic major abdominal surgery: A randomized, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.老年患者腹腔镜下腹部大手术全静脉麻醉中使用西普罗酚和丙泊酚术后恢复质量的比较:一项随机、对照、双盲、非劣效性试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2024 Dec;99:111660. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111660. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
10
Ciprofol versus propofol for anesthesia induction in cardiac surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial.西普罗夫与异丙酚用于心脏手术麻醉诱导:一项随机双盲对照临床试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 12;24(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02795-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Alone versus Ciprofol with Fentanyl for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.丙泊酚单用与丙泊酚联合芬太尼用于上消化道内镜检查的有效性和安全性:一项随机、双盲、对照试验
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Jun 18;19:5231-5241. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S516064. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of anesthetic nasal masks on hypoxemia in overweight/obese patients undergoing gastroscopy: a randomized controlled trial.麻醉鼻罩对超重/肥胖患者胃镜检查期间低氧血症的影响:一项随机对照试验
Eur J Med Res. 2025 May 2;30(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02534-2.
3
Determination of the Median Effective Dose of Ciprofol Combined with Sufentanil in Inhibiting Tracheal Intubation Response in Female Patients.

本文引用的文献

1
The safety and efficacy between remimazolam and propofol in intravenous anesthesia of endoscopy operation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于内镜手术静脉麻醉的安全性和有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2023 Nov 1;109(11):3566-3577. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000638.
2
The efficacy and safety of ciprofol use for the induction of general anesthesia in patients undergoing gynecological surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study.西普罗酚用于妇科手术全身麻醉诱导的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug 3;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01782-7.
3
Comparison of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for the induction of deep sedation during gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures: A multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled phase 3 clinical trial.
丙泊酚联合舒芬太尼抑制女性患者气管插管反应的半数有效剂量测定
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 7;15(1):11864. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95135-2.
比较西普鲁福(HSK3486)与异丙酚用于胃镜和结肠镜检查中深度镇静诱导的效果:一项多中心、非劣效性、随机、对照 3 期临床试验。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2022 Aug;131(2):138-148. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13761. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
4
Efficacy and Safety of HSK3486 for Anesthesia/Sedation in Patients Undergoing Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Propofol-Controlled, Randomized, Phase 3 Study.HSK3486 用于纤维支气管镜检查患者麻醉/镇静的有效性和安全性:一项多中心、双盲、丙泊酚对照、随机、3 期研究。
CNS Drugs. 2022 Mar;36(3):301-313. doi: 10.1007/s40263-021-00890-1. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
5
Safety and efficacy of ciprofol vs. propofol for sedation in intensive care unit patients with mechanical ventilation: a multi-center, open label, randomized, phase 2 trial.西普福与异丙酚用于机械通气重症监护病房患者镇静的安全性和有效性:一项多中心、开放标签、随机、2 期临床试验。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 May 5;135(9):1043-1051. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001912.
6
Effect of continuous infusion of a subhypnotic dose of propofol on nausea and vomiting after carboprost administration at cesarean delivery: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.剖宫产术中卡前列素给药后持续输注亚催眠剂量丙泊酚对恶心呕吐的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 May;157(2):283-288. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13742. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
7
Risk-adapted strategy or universal multimodal approach for PONV prophylaxis?风险适应策略或通用多模式方法用于预防 PONV?
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Dec;34(4):721-734. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.05.003. Epub 2020 May 21.
8
New insights into the pathophysiology and risk factors for PONV.对 PONV 的病理生理学和危险因素的新认识。
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Dec;34(4):667-679. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
9
A review of nausea and vomiting in the anaesthetic and post anaesthetic environment.麻醉及麻醉后环境中恶心与呕吐的综述
J Perioper Pract. 2017 Oct;27(10):224-227. doi: 10.1177/175045891702701004.
10
Office Operative Hysteroscopy: An Update.门诊操作宫腔镜检查:更新。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Feb;25(2):199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Aug 10.