Suppr超能文献

关于生物衰老基本原理的分歧。

Disagreement on foundational principles of biological aging.

作者信息

Gladyshev Vadim N, Anderson Benjamin, Barlit Hanna, Barré Benjamin, Beck Samuel, Behrouz Bahareh, Belsky Daniel W, Chaix Amandine, Chamoli Manish, Chen Brian H, Cheng Kaiyang, Chuprin Jane, Churchill Gary A, Cipriano Andrea, Colville Alex, Deelen Joris, Deigin Yuri, Edmonds KeHuan K, English Bradley W, Fang Ruogu, Florea Michael, Gershteyn Iosif M, Gill Diljeet, Goetz Laura H, Gorbunova Vera, Griffin Patrick T, Horvath Steve, Borch Jensen Martin, Jin Xin, Jovanovska Sara, Kajderowicz Kathrin M, Kasahara Tomoko, Kerepesi Csaba, Kulkarni Subhash, Labunskyy Vyacheslav M, Levine Morgan E, Libert Sergiy, Lu J Yuyang, Lu Yuancheng Ryan, Marioni Riccardo E, McCoy Brianah M, Mitchell Wayne, Moqri Mahdi, Nasirian Farzaneh, Niimi Peter, Oh Hamilton Se-Hwee, Okundaye Brian, Parkhitko Andrey A, Peshkin Leonid, Petljak Mia, Poganik Jesse R, Pridham Glen, Promislow Daniel E L, Prusisz Weronika, Quiniou Margaux, Raj Ken, Richard Daniel, Ricon Jose Luis, Rutledge Jarod, Scheibye-Knudsen Morten, Schork Nicholas J, Seluanov Andrei, Shadpour Michael, Shindyapina Anastasia V, Shuken Steven R, Sivakumar Sruthi, Stoeger Thomas, Sugiura Ayumu, Sutton Nadia R, Suvorov Alexander, Tarkhov Andrei E, Teeling Emma C, Trapp Alexandre, Tyshkovskiy Alexander, Unfried Maximilian, Ward-Caviness Cavin K, Yim Sun Hee, Ying Kejun, Yunes Jeffrey, Zhang Bohan, Zhavoronkov Alex

机构信息

Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.

出版信息

PNAS Nexus. 2024 Dec 3;3(12):pgae499. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae499. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

To gain insight into how researchers of aging perceive the process they study, we conducted a survey among experts in the field. While highlighting some common features of aging, the survey exposed broad disagreement on the foundational issues. What is aging? What causes it? When does it begin? What constitutes rejuvenation? Not only was there no consensus on these and other core questions, but none of the questions received a majority opinion-even regarding the need for consensus itself. Despite many researchers believing they understand aging, their understanding diverges considerably. Importantly, as different processes are labeled as "aging" by researchers, different experimental approaches are prioritized. The survey shed light on the need to better define which aging processes this field should target and what its goals are. It also allowed us to categorize contemporary views on aging and rejuvenation, revealing critical, yet largely unanswered, questions that appear disconnected from the current research focus. Finally, we discuss ways to address the disagreement, which we hope will ultimately aid progress in the field.

摘要

为深入了解衰老领域的研究人员如何看待他们所研究的过程,我们对该领域的专家进行了一项调查。在强调衰老的一些共同特征的同时,该调查揭示了在基础问题上存在广泛的分歧。什么是衰老?是什么导致了衰老?衰老何时开始?什么构成了返老还童?不仅在这些以及其他核心问题上没有达成共识,而且甚至关于是否需要达成共识这一问题,也没有一个问题获得多数人的意见。尽管许多研究人员认为他们理解衰老,但他们的理解差异很大。重要的是,由于研究人员将不同的过程标记为“衰老”,因此优先采用了不同的实验方法。该调查揭示了需要更好地定义该领域应针对哪些衰老过程以及其目标是什么。它还使我们能够对当代关于衰老和返老还童的观点进行分类,揭示了一些关键但在很大程度上未得到解答的问题,这些问题似乎与当前的研究重点脱节。最后,我们讨论了解决分歧的方法,希望这最终将有助于该领域的进展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96b3/11630784/50ec9bd0c895/pgae499f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验