文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Implementation and User Satisfaction of a Comprehensive Telemedicine Approach for SARS-CoV-2 Self-Sampling: Monocentric, Prospective, Interventional, Open-Label, Controlled, Two-Arm Feasibility Study.

作者信息

Voit Florian, Erber Johanna, Egert-Schwender Silvia, Hanselmann Michael, Laxy Michael, Kehl Victoria, Hoffmann Dieter, Jeske Samuel D, Michler Thomas, Protzer Ulrike, Kohlmayer Florian, Schmid Roland M, Spinner Christoph D, Weidlich Simon

机构信息

Clinical Department for Internal Medicine II - Department of Clinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Muenchner Studienzentrum, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 11;8:e57608. doi: 10.2196/57608.


DOI:10.2196/57608
PMID:39661941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11655044/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The universal availability of smartphones has created new opportunities for innovative telemedicine applications in health care. The COVID-19 pandemic has heightened the demand for contactless health care services, making SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing a crucial component of pandemic containment. OBJECTIVE: This feasibility study aimed to examine a comprehensive telemedicine approach for SARS-CoV-2 testing, focusing on the practicality, user satisfaction, and economic implications of self-sampling guided by a telemedicine platform. METHODS: The study process involved shipping self-sampling kits, providing instructions for at-home sample collection, processing biomaterials (swabs and capillary blood), communicating test results, and providing interoperable data for clinical routine and research through a medical mobile app. A total of 100 individuals were randomly assigned to either the conventional health care professional (HCP)-performed SARS-CoV-2 testing group (conventional testing group, CG) or the telemedicine-guided SARS-CoV-2 self-sampling approach (telemedicine group, TG). Feasibility of the TG approach, user satisfaction, user-centered outcomes, and economic aspects were assessed and compared between the groups. RESULTS: In the TG group, 47 out of 49 (95%) individuals received a self-sampling kit via mail, and 37out of 49 (76%) individuals successfully returned at least one sample for diagnostics. SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests were conducted in 95% (35/37) of TG cases compared with 88% (44/50) in the CG. Users in the TG reported high satisfaction levels with ease of use (5.2/7), interface satisfaction (5.2/7), and usefulness (4.3/7). A microcosting model indicated a slightly higher cost for the TG approach than the CG approach. The TG demonstrated the potential to facilitate interoperable data transmission by providing anonymized, standardized datasets for extraction using Health Level 7-Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources. This supports the national COVID-19 Data Exchange Platform and facilitates epidemiological evaluation based on the German COVID Consensus dataset. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest that a telemedicine-based approach to SARS-CoV-2 testing is feasible and could be integrated into existing hospital data infrastructures. This model has the potential for broader application in medical care, offering a scalable solution that could improve user satisfaction and treatment quality in the future.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40ac/11655044/0973189bcfae/formative-v8-e57608-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40ac/11655044/2e48341db89f/formative-v8-e57608-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40ac/11655044/fd61315e7283/formative-v8-e57608-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40ac/11655044/1238565a8a91/formative-v8-e57608-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40ac/11655044/229f2eb24319/formative-v8-e57608-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40ac/11655044/0973189bcfae/formative-v8-e57608-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40ac/11655044/2e48341db89f/formative-v8-e57608-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40ac/11655044/fd61315e7283/formative-v8-e57608-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40ac/11655044/1238565a8a91/formative-v8-e57608-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40ac/11655044/229f2eb24319/formative-v8-e57608-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40ac/11655044/0973189bcfae/formative-v8-e57608-g005.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Implementation and User Satisfaction of a Comprehensive Telemedicine Approach for SARS-CoV-2 Self-Sampling: Monocentric, Prospective, Interventional, Open-Label, Controlled, Two-Arm Feasibility Study.

JMIR Form Res. 2024-12-11

[2]
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-12-16

[3]
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-7-22

[4]
Laboratory-based molecular test alternatives to RT-PCR for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-10-14

[5]
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-20

[6]
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-11-17

[7]
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025-5-21

[8]
Workplace interventions to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection outside of healthcare settings.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-6

[9]
Assessment of the Acceptability and Feasibility of Using Mobile Robotic Systems for Patient Evaluation.

JAMA Netw Open. 2021-3-1

[10]
Technology-enabled CONTACT tracing in care homes in the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONTACT non-randomised mixed-methods feasibility study.

Health Technol Assess. 2025-5

本文引用的文献

[1]
Evaluation of Self-Collected Versus Health Care Professional (HCP)-Performed Sampling and the Potential Impact on the Diagnostic Results of Asymptomatic Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) in High-Risk Individuals.

Infect Dis Rep. 2023-8-25

[2]
Effects of COVID-19 vaccination and previous infection on Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection and relation with serology.

Nat Commun. 2023-8-9

[3]
Feasibility of self-organized blood sample collection in adults for study purposes in a primary care setting.

PLoS One. 2023

[4]
iCHECK-DH: Guidelines and Checklist for the Reporting on Digital Health Implementations.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-5-10

[5]
Applications of Telemedicine in Dermatology.

Cureus. 2022-8-7

[6]
The COVID-19 Data Exchange Platform of the German University Medicine.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022-5-25

[7]
The development, validation and application of remote blood sample collection in telehealth programmes.

J Telemed Telecare. 2024-5

[8]
Telemedicine in Cardiology: Modern Technologies to Improve Cardiovascular Patients' Outcomes-A Narrative Review.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2022-2-1

[9]
A Telemedicine-Guided Self-Collection Approach for PCR-Based SARS-CoV-2 Testing: Comparative Study.

JMIR Form Res. 2022-1-4

[10]
Integration of mobile sensors in a telemedicine hospital system: remote-monitoring in COVID-19 patients.

Z Gesundh Wiss. 2022

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索