Jacobs Zachary G, Pierce Pamela, Hoverman Adam S, Love Asma, Carney Patricia A, Lahti Elizabeth P
Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, School of Medicine, Portland, OR, USA.
OHSU Library, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(7):1502-1510. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09266-9. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
Narrative medicine (NM) emphasizes the vital role healthcare stories play in conveying patients' experiences and expanding health professionals' reflective capacity. Though predicated on inclusivity, social justice, and equality, NM programs do not tend to include communities with marginalized health narratives due to a paucity of trained facilitators.
To evaluate the impact of a novel virtual NM facilitator training intended to expand NM programming to minoritized communities.
Mixed methods analysis of surveys administered before (pre), after (post), and 6 months after (6mo follow-up) the training.
Healthcare professionals, scholars, caregivers, and patients self-identifying as a member of (n = 25/42, 60%) and/or working with (n = 36/42, 86%) minoritized community groups.
Perceived confidence and skills relating to NM and facilitating NM activities, and open-ended questions about the curriculum across three timepoints.
Training occurred over eight half-day sessions with large group plenaries, facilitated small groups, and art and humanities workshops.
Response rates were n = 34/42 (81%), n = 29/42 (69%), and n = 21/42 (50%), respectively, for the three timepoints. Compared to pre-training, post- and 6mo follow-up surveys showed statistical improvements on six of seven items, including confidence and skill in facilitating NM activities (mean = 3.2 vs. 5.5 vs. 5.4), creating NM curricula (mean = 3.1 vs 5.2 vs. 5.2), defining narrative competence (mean = 4.2 vs. 5.5 vs. 5.3), engaging team members (mean = 4.7 vs. 5.7 vs. 5.5), identifying humanities materials (mean = 3.3 vs 5.0 vs. 5.1), and recognizing diverse perspectives (mean = 4.6 vs. 5.5 vs. 5.5). Pairwise comparisons showed post- and 6mo follow-up responses significantly increased (p ≤ 0.01) from pre-training. Participants reported facilitating more NM activities after training (mean = 1.5 vs. 1.9; p = 0.006).
We successfully recruited and engaged participants from minoritized communities to facilitate NM sessions. Future efforts should focus on objective assessments of skills, and more in-depth research using focus groups, observation, and key informant interviews.
叙事医学(NM)强调医疗故事在传达患者经历和扩展医疗专业人员反思能力方面所起的重要作用。尽管叙事医学项目基于包容性、社会正义和平等理念,但由于缺乏训练有素的促进者,这些项目往往不包括具有边缘化健康叙事的社区。
评估一种新型虚拟叙事医学促进者培训的影响,该培训旨在将叙事医学项目扩展到少数族裔社区。
对培训前(预)、培训后(后)和培训后6个月(6个月随访)进行的调查进行混合方法分析。
医疗专业人员、学者、护理人员和患者,他们自我认定为少数族裔社区群体的成员(n = 25/42,60%)和/或与少数族裔社区群体合作(n = 36/42,86%)。
与叙事医学及促进叙事医学活动相关的感知信心和技能,以及在三个时间点关于课程的开放式问题。
培训为期八个半天课程,包括大型全体会议、小组讨论以及艺术和人文工作坊。
三个时间点的回复率分别为n = 34/42(81%)、n = 29/42(69%)和n = 21/42(50%)。与培训前相比,培训后和6个月随访调查显示,七个项目中的六个有统计学上的改善,包括促进叙事医学活动的信心和技能(均值 = 3.2对5.5对5.4)、创建叙事医学课程(均值 = 3.1对5.2对5.2)、定义叙事能力(均值 = 4.2对5.5对5.3)、吸引团队成员(均值 = 4.7对5.7对5.5)、识别人文材料(均值 = 3.3对5.0对5.1)以及认识不同观点(均值 = 4.6对5.5对5.5)。两两比较显示,培训后和6个月随访的回复与培训前相比显著增加(p≤0.01)。参与者报告培训后促进了更多的叙事医学活动(均值 = 1.5对1.9;p = 0.006)。
我们成功招募并吸引了少数族裔社区的参与者来促进叙事医学课程。未来的努力应集中在对技能的客观评估,以及使用焦点小组、观察和关键 informant 访谈进行更深入的研究。