Suppr超能文献

2016年至2023年社区居住老年人频繁住院风险筛查:机器学习驱动的项目选择、评分系统开发及前瞻性验证

Screening for frequent hospitalization risk among community-dwelling older adult between 2016 and 2023: machine learning-driven item selection, scoring system development, and prospective validation.

作者信息

Leung Eman, Guan Jingjing, Zhang Qingpeng, Ching Chun Cheung, Yee Hiliary, Liu Yilin, Ng Hang Sau, Xu Richard, Tsang Hector Wing Hong, Lee Albert, Chen Frank Youhua

机构信息

Department of Management Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.

JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 27;12:1413529. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1413529. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Screening for frequent hospitalizations in the community can help prevent super-utilizers from growing in the inpatient population. However, the determinants of frequent hospitalizations have not been systematically examined, their operational definitions have been inconsistent, and screening among community members lacks tools. Nor do we know if what determined frequent hospitalizations before COVID-19 continued to be the determinant of frequent hospitalizations at the height of the pandemic. Hence, the current study aims to identify determinants of frequent hospitalization and their screening items developed from the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), as our 273-item CGA is too lengthy to administer in full in community or primary care settings. The stability of the identified determinants will be examined in terms of the prospective validity of pre-COVID-selected items administered at the height of the pandemic.

METHODS

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessments (CGAs) were administered between 2016 and 2018 in the homes of 1,611 older adults aged 65+ years. Learning models were deployed to select CGA items to maximize the classification of different operational definitions of frequent hospitalizations, ranging from the most inclusive definition, wherein two or more hospitalizations over 2 years, to the most exclusive, wherein two or more hospitalizations must appear during year two, reflecting different care needs. In addition, the CGA items selected by the best-performing learning model were then developed into a random-forest-based scoring system for assessing frequent hospitalization risk, the validity of which was tested during 2018 and again prospectively between 2022 and 2023 in a sample of 329 older adults recruited from a district adjacent to where the CGAs were initially performed.

RESULTS

Seventeen items were selected from the CGA by our best-performing algorithm (DeepBoost), achieving 0.90 AUC in classifying operational definitions of frequent hospitalizations differing in temporal distributions and care needs. The number of medications prescribed and the need for assistance with emptying the bowel, housekeeping, transportation, and laundry were selected using the DeepBoost algorithm under the supervision of all operational definitions of frequent hospitalizations. On the other hand, reliance on walking aids, ability to balance on one's own, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and usage of social services were selected in the top 10 by all but the operational definitions that reflect the greatest care needs. The prospective validation of the original risk-scoring system using a sample recruited from a different district during the COVID-19 pandemic achieved an AUC of 0.82 in differentiating those rehospitalized twice or more over 2 years from those who were not.

CONCLUSION

A small subset of CGA items representing one's independence in aspects of (instrumental) activities of daily living, mobility, history of COPD, and social service utilization are sufficient for community members at risk of frequent hospitalization. The determinants of frequent hospitalization represented by the subset of CGA items remain relevant over the course of COVID-19 pandemic and across sociogeography.

摘要

背景

筛查社区中频繁住院的情况有助于防止住院患者中超利用者数量的增加。然而,频繁住院的决定因素尚未得到系统研究,其操作定义不一致,且社区成员筛查缺乏工具。我们也不知道在新冠疫情之前决定频繁住院的因素在疫情高峰期是否仍然是频繁住院的决定因素。因此,本研究旨在确定频繁住院的决定因素以及从综合老年评估(CGA)中开发的筛查项目,因为我们273项的CGA在社区或初级保健环境中完整实施过于冗长。将根据在疫情高峰期对新冠疫情之前选定项目进行前瞻性验证的情况,来检验所确定决定因素的稳定性。

方法

2016年至2018年期间,对1611名65岁及以上老年人进行了居家综合老年评估。采用学习模型选择CGA项目,以最大限度地对频繁住院的不同操作定义进行分类,范围从最宽泛的定义(即两年内两次或更多次住院)到最严格的定义(即第二年必须出现两次或更多次住院),反映不同的护理需求。此外,将表现最佳的学习模型选择的CGA项目开发成基于随机森林的评分系统,用于评估频繁住院风险,并在2018年以及2022年至2023年期间对从最初进行CGA的地区相邻地区招募的329名老年人样本进行前瞻性验证,检验其有效性。

结果

通过我们表现最佳的算法(深度提升算法)从CGA中选择了17个项目,在对频繁住院的时间分布和护理需求不同的操作定义进行分类时,曲线下面积(AUC)达到0.90。在频繁住院的所有操作定义的监督下,使用深度提升算法选择了所开药物的数量以及排便、家务、交通和洗衣方面的协助需求。另一方面,除了反映最大护理需求的操作定义外,在所有操作定义中,对助行器的依赖、独自平衡能力、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)病史以及社会服务的使用都在前10名中被选中。在新冠疫情期间,使用从不同地区招募的样本对原始风险评分系统进行前瞻性验证,在区分两年内再次住院两次或更多次的患者与未再次住院的患者方面,AUC为0.82。

结论

一小部分代表日常生活(工具性)活动、行动能力、COPD病史和社会服务利用方面独立性的CGA项目,对于有频繁住院风险的社区成员来说就足够了。由CGA项目子集代表的频繁住院决定因素在新冠疫情期间以及不同社会地理区域中仍然相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/444e/11632619/aefc78ee9517/fpubh-12-1413529-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验