Suppr超能文献

血液透析和腹膜透析患者的铁管理比较:一项系统评价

Comparative iron management in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients: a systematic review.

作者信息

van Lieshout Thomas S, Klerks Anastasia K, Mahic Osman, Vernooij Robin W M, Eisenga Michele F, van Jaarsveld Brigit C, Abrahams Alferso C

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Research Institute Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Internal Medicine, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Nephrol. 2024 Nov 27;4:1488758. doi: 10.3389/fneph.2024.1488758. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with kidney failure undergoing dialysis often suffer from anemia. Iron deficiency, along with a shortage in erythropoietin, is a common cause. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients may have a different iron metabolism compared to hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study aims to compare both dialysis modalities regarding their differences in iron management.

METHODS

PubMed (MEDLINE) and Embase were screened for randomized controlled trials and observational studies including both patients on HD or PD with information on iron management. Outcomes for iron management for this systematic review included: prevalence of supplementation, route of administration, dose, frequency and hemoglobin and iron status parameters.

RESULTS

15 eligible studies (930,436 patients), of which 8 cohort and 7 cross-sectional, were analyzed. The prevalence of intravenous (IV) iron supplementation ranged from 11.7% to 84.4% in HD patients, compared to 1.6% to 49.0% in PD patients. Ten studies reported that HD patients only received IV iron, while five studies reported this for PD patients. For oral iron supplementation, three studies involved HD patients, whereas seven studies involved PD patients. The cumulative monthly IV iron dose ranged from 108 to 750 mg in the HD group, compared to 65 to 250 mg in the PD group. Hemoglobin levels ranged from 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL in HD patients, versus 9.6 to 11.9 g/dL in PD patients.

CONCLUSION

Iron management differs between HD and PD patients, with HD patients receiving higher doses and more frequent IV iron. There was significant heterogeneity in the outcomes between the studies, primarily due to the lack of a uniform global policy on iron management. Despite these differences, hemoglobin levels and iron status parameters were comparable between the two groups. Future research should explore the underlying mechanisms and broader impacts of iron treatment, including patient-reported outcomes, to optimize anemia management and improve quality of life for dialysis patients.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022336970.

摘要

背景

接受透析的肾衰竭患者常患有贫血。缺铁以及促红细胞生成素缺乏是常见原因。与血液透析(HD)患者相比,腹膜透析(PD)患者可能具有不同的铁代谢。本研究旨在比较两种透析方式在铁管理方面的差异。

方法

在PubMed(MEDLINE)和Embase中筛选随机对照试验和观察性研究,纳入HD或PD患者且有铁管理相关信息。该系统评价中铁管理的结局包括:补充剂的患病率、给药途径、剂量、频率以及血红蛋白和铁状态参数。

结果

分析了15项符合条件的研究(930,436例患者),其中8项队列研究和7项横断面研究。HD患者静脉注射(IV)铁补充剂的患病率在11.7%至84.4%之间,而PD患者为1.6%至49.0%。10项研究报告HD患者仅接受IV铁,而5项研究报告PD患者如此。对于口服铁补充剂,3项研究涉及HD患者,而7项研究涉及PD患者。HD组每月IV铁累积剂量在108至750毫克之间,而PD组为65至250毫克。HD患者血红蛋白水平在10.0至12.0克/分升之间,而PD患者为9.6至11.9克/分升。

结论

HD和PD患者的铁管理不同,HD患者接受更高剂量且更频繁的IV铁。研究间结局存在显著异质性,主要是由于缺乏统一的全球铁管理政策。尽管存在这些差异,但两组间血红蛋白水平和铁状态参数具有可比性。未来研究应探索铁治疗的潜在机制和更广泛影响,包括患者报告的结局,以优化贫血管理并改善透析患者的生活质量。

系统评价注册

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/,标识符CRD42022336970。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/248b/11631840/99efad428645/fneph-04-1488758-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验