• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌患者极低前切除术(VLAR)与蝶骨间切除术(ISR)的并发症及结局比较

Comparison of Complications and Outcomes of Very Low Anterior Resection (VLAR) Versus Intersphentric Resection (ISR) In Patients with Rectal Cancer.

作者信息

Hosseini Seyed Vahid, Gorgi Khadije, Shojaei-Zarghani Sara, Zeinalpour Adel, Mohammadi Armin

机构信息

Colorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

World J Plast Surg. 2024;13(3):92-95. doi: 10.61186/wjps.13.3.92.

DOI:10.61186/wjps.13.3.92
PMID:39665004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11629765/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is a cancer that starts in the colon or rectum, which are part of the digestive system. Intersphincteric resection (ISR) and very low anterior resection (VLAR) are surgical procedures used in rectal malignancy. We aimed to compare postoperative complications and recurrence after VLAR and ISR techniques in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 80 rectal cancer patients who underwent VLRA and ISR in Shahid Faghihi, and Abu-Ali Sina Charity Hospitals, Shiraz, Iran from 2019 to 2023 were enrolled. Eligible patients were divided into two groups based on the type of operation. One group underwent VLAR (n=40) and the second group of patients underwent ISR(n=40). Postoperative complications and outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean age in VLAR and ISR groups was 52.8±14.3 and 54.3±11.6 years, respectively. Low anterior resection syndrome was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.39). Postoperative fecal incontinence was observed in 27.5% and 22.5% of VLAR and ISR groups, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (P=0.91). Rectovaginal fistula was reported in 2.5% of patients in both groups (P=0.61).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in postoperative complications in VLAR and ISR techniques. Considering the lack of significant difference in the complications of the two surgical groups, it is suggested to choose the surgical method based on the location of the tumor.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌是一种起源于结肠或直肠的癌症,结肠和直肠是消化系统的一部分。括约肌间切除术(ISR)和超低位前切除术(VLAR)是用于直肠恶性肿瘤的外科手术。我们旨在比较直肠癌患者接受VLAR和ISR技术后的术后并发症及复发情况。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了2019年至2023年期间在伊朗设拉子的沙希德·法吉希医院和阿布·阿里·西纳慈善医院接受VLRA和ISR手术的80例直肠癌患者。符合条件的患者根据手术类型分为两组。一组接受VLAR(n = 40),第二组患者接受ISR(n = 40)。比较两组的术后并发症和结局。

结果

VLAR组和ISR组的平均年龄分别为52.8±14.3岁和54.3±11.6岁。两组之间低位前切除综合征无显著差异(P = 0.39)。VLAR组和ISR组分别有27.5%和22.5%的患者出现术后大便失禁。这种差异无统计学意义(P = 0.91)。两组均有2.5%的患者报告发生直肠阴道瘘(P = 0.61)。

结论

VLAR和ISR技术在术后并发症方面没有差异。考虑到两个手术组的并发症没有显著差异,建议根据肿瘤位置选择手术方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Complications and Outcomes of Very Low Anterior Resection (VLAR) Versus Intersphentric Resection (ISR) In Patients with Rectal Cancer.直肠癌患者极低前切除术(VLAR)与蝶骨间切除术(ISR)的并发症及结局比较
World J Plast Surg. 2024;13(3):92-95. doi: 10.61186/wjps.13.3.92.
2
LAR vs VLAR in Low Rectal Cancer - Postoperative Results - A Single-Center Experience.低位直肠癌中 LAR 与 VLAR 的对比——术后结果——单中心经验
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2021 May-Jun;116(3):321-330. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.116.3.321.
3
[Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].[机器人辅助低位直肠癌括约肌间切除术的技术特点及临床疗效分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 25;22(12):1137-1143. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.12.008.
4
Preoperative incremental maximum squeeze pressure as a predictor of fecal incontinence after very low anterior resection for low rectal cancer.术前增量最大收缩压预测低位直肠癌极低前切除术后粪便失禁。
Surg Today. 2020 May;50(5):516-524. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01926-2. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
5
Outcomes of ultra-low anterior resection combined with or without intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer patients.低位直肠癌患者行超低位前切除术联合或不联合括约肌间切除术的疗效
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Oct;30(10):1311-21. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2303-x. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
6
Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection.视频:经肛门内括约肌间切除术的腹腔镜入路优势。
Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1661-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1451-x. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
7
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for a lower rectal tumor.腹腔镜低位直肠肿瘤括约肌间切除术的安全性与可行性
Oncol Lett. 2017 Oct;14(4):4142-4150. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6664. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
8
Clinical Efficacy of Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer Compared With Abdominoperineal Resection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.经括约肌间切除术与腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌的临床疗效比较:单中心回顾性研究。
Am Surg. 2023 Apr;89(4):1009-1017. doi: 10.1177/00031348211056271. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
9
Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer in Japan.日本低位直肠癌括约肌间切除术的长期结果
Surg Today. 2019 Apr;49(4):275-285. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1754-4. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
10
Colonic prolapse after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a report of 12 cases.超低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除术后的结肠脱垂:12例报告
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Oct;20(10):701-5. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1522-7. Epub 2016 Sep 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention.结直肠癌:流行病学、风险因素与预防
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 17;16(8):1530. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081530.
2
Functional outcomes of intersphincteric resection in low rectal tumors.低位直肠肿瘤括约肌间切除术的功能预后
Turk J Surg. 2022 Jun 29;38(2):180-186. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5556. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Targeted Therapy for Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌的靶向治疗
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2022 Apr;31(2):255-264. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.11.006. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
4
Advances in Rectal Cancer Surgery.直肠癌手术的进展
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2022 Mar;21(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.01.008. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
5
Comparative study of functional outcomes between ultra-low anterior resection and inter-sphincteric resection: a propensity matched analysis.超低位前切除术与经肛门内括约肌间切除术的功能结局比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Jan;92(1-2):151-156. doi: 10.1111/ans.17405. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
6
Robotic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Technical Controversies and a Systematic Review on the Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.低位直肠癌的机器人括约肌间切除术:技术争议及围手术期、肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价
Ann Coloproctol. 2021 Dec;37(6):351-367. doi: 10.3393/ac.2021.00836.0119. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
7
Retrospective study of the functional and oncological outcomes of conformal sphincter preservation operation in the treatment of very low rectal cancer.保肛手术治疗超低位直肠癌的功能和肿瘤学结局的回顾性研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Oct;24(10):1025-1034. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02229-2. Epub 2020 May 2.
8
Comprehensive review of targeted therapy for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌靶向治疗的综合综述。
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020 Mar 20;5(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0116-z.
9
Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer in Japan.日本低位直肠癌括约肌间切除术的长期结果
Surg Today. 2019 Apr;49(4):275-285. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1754-4. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
10
Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: A review of the updated literature.极低位直肠癌的括约肌间切除术:最新文献综述
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017 Apr 25;1(1):24-32. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12003. eCollection 2017 Apr.