Rahal Danny, Fosco Gregory M
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.
Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Child Dev. 2025 Mar-Apr;96(2):797-811. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14206. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
Conflict and a lack of cohesive daily family relationships can negatively affect adolescent adjustment, although adolescents differ in how they respond (i.e., their emotional reactivity) to these daily experiences. The present study assessed whether adolescents' well-being (i.e., life satisfaction, purpose) was associated with dampened emotional reactivity to daily variability in family conflict and cohesion. Adolescents (N = 150; M = 14.60, SD = 0.83; 61.3% female; 83.4% white) completed a questionnaire regarding well-being and reported family conflict, cohesion, and negative emotion for 21 days between August 2015 and November 2016. Greater life satisfaction was related to dampened negative emotional reactivity to daily conflict, whereas greater purpose was related to dampened negative emotional reactivity to changes in daily family cohesion. Well-being may foster resilience in adolescents' day-to-day emotional processes.
冲突以及缺乏紧密的日常家庭关系会对青少年的适应产生负面影响，尽管青少年对这些日常经历的反应方式（即他们的情绪反应性）存在差异。本研究评估了青少年的幸福感（即生活满意度、人生目标）是否与对家庭冲突和凝聚力的日常变化的情绪反应性降低有关。青少年（N = 150；M = 14.60，标准差 = 0.83；61.3% 为女性；83.4% 为白人）在2015年8月至2016年11月期间，连续21天完成了一份关于幸福感的问卷，并报告了家庭冲突、凝聚力和负面情绪。更高的生活满意度与对日常冲突的负面情绪反应性降低有关，而更强的人生目标与对日常家庭凝聚力变化的负面情绪反应性降低有关。幸福感可能会增强青少年日常情绪过程中的复原力。
