Sharp Patricia E
Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, USA.
Hippocampus. 2025 Jan;35(1):e23662. doi: 10.1002/hipo.23662.
The mandate for this special issue of Hippocampus was to provide a few examples of one's own work in a relatively personal context. Accordingly, I will discuss some of my own work here, but will also provide a broader arc of ideas and discoveries within which the efforts of myself and many others have taken place. This history begins with the associationists, who proposed that the human mind could be understood, in part, as a compounding of simple associations between contiguously occurring items and events. This idea was taken up by the behaviorist traditions, which made significant progress toward refining this simple idea. Subsequently, as interest turned toward neural mechanisms, Donald Hebb provided a foundational proposal for how synaptic changes could provide for this associative learning. The associationist view was, however, challenged by gestaltists who took a more wholistic, cognitive approach. Stunning support was provided for Tolman's cognitive map idea with the discovery of place cells in the hippocampus, and the subsequent treatise provided in O'Keefe and Nadel's The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. I propose that, ultimately, this associationist versus cognitive debate was settled by the development of the Parallel Distributed Processing (PDP) approach, which incorporated Hebbian synapses into large, neural-like networks, which could accomplish complex cognitive tasks. My own work took place within the framework provided by O'Keefe and Nadel. One aspect of my work followed Jim Ranck's discovery of Head Direction cells. Tad Blair and others in my lab traced a brainstem circuit, which we proposed could explain the origins of the directional code. In other work, I investigated cells in the subicular region. These provided a contrast to the hippocampal place cells in that each subicular cell kept the same spatial pattern across different environments, whereas the hippocampal cells formed a different map for each context.
《海马体》这一特刊的要求是在相对个人化的背景下提供一些自己工作的例子。因此,我将在这里讨论我自己的一些工作,但也会提供一个更广泛的思想和发现脉络,在这个脉络中我自己以及许多其他人都付出了努力。这段历史始于联想主义者,他们提出人类思维在一定程度上可以被理解为连续出现的事物和事件之间简单联想的复合。这一观点被行为主义传统所采纳,行为主义传统在完善这个简单观点方面取得了重大进展。随后,随着人们对神经机制的兴趣转向,唐纳德·赫布提出了一个关于突触变化如何支持这种联想学习的基础提议。然而,联想主义观点受到了格式塔主义者的挑战,他们采取了更整体的认知方法。海马体中位置细胞的发现为托尔曼的认知地图概念提供了惊人的支持,随后奥基夫和纳德尔在《海马体作为认知地图》一书中进行了论述。我认为,最终,这场联想主义与认知的争论通过并行分布式处理(PDP)方法的发展得到了解决,该方法将赫布突触纳入大型的、类似神经网络的系统中,这些系统可以完成复杂的认知任务。我自己的工作是在奥基夫和纳德尔提供的框架内进行的。我工作的一个方面是跟随吉姆·兰克对头部方向细胞的发现展开的。泰德·布莱尔和我实验室的其他人追踪了一条脑干回路,我们认为这条回路可以解释方向编码的起源。在其他工作中,我研究了下托区域的细胞。这些细胞与海马体位置细胞形成了对比,因为每个下托细胞在不同环境中保持相同的空间模式,而海马体细胞在每个环境中形成不同的地图。