Schiller Daniela, Eichenbaum Howard, Buffalo Elizabeth A, Davachi Lila, Foster David J, Leutgeb Stefan, Ranganath Charan
Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029,
Center for Memory and Brain, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215,
J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 14;35(41):13904-11. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2618-15.2015.
More than 50 years of research have led to the general agreement that the hippocampus contributes to memory, but there has been a major schism among theories of hippocampal function over this time. Some researchers argue that the hippocampus plays a broad role in episodic and declarative memory, whereas others argue for a specific role in the creation of spatial cognitive maps and navigation. Although both views have merit, neither provides a complete account of hippocampal function. Guided by recent reviews that attempt to bridge between these views, here we suggest that reconciliation can be accomplished by exploring hippocampal function from the perspective of Tolman's (1948) original conception of a cognitive map as organizing experience and guiding behavior across all domains of cognition. We emphasize recent studies in animals and humans showing that hippocampal networks support a broad range of domains of cognitive maps, that these networks organize specific experiences within the contextually relevant map, and that network activity patterns reflect behavior guided through cognitive maps. These results are consistent with a framework that bridges theories of hippocampal function by conceptualizing the hippocampus as organizing incoming information within the context of a multidimensional cognitive map of spatial, temporal, and associational context.
Research of hippocampal function is dominated by two major views. The spatial view argues that the hippocampus tracks routes through space, whereas the memory view suggests a broad role in declarative memory. Both views rely on considerable evidence, but neither provides a complete account of hippocampal function. Here we review evidence that, in addition to spatial context, the hippocampus encodes a wide variety of information about temporal and situational context, about the systematic organization of events in abstract space, and about routes through maps of cognition and space. We argue that these findings cross the boundaries of the memory and spatial views and offer new insights into hippocampal function as a system supporting a broad range of cognitive maps.
五十多年的研究已达成普遍共识,即海马体对记忆有贡献,但在此期间,关于海马体功能的理论存在重大分歧。一些研究人员认为,海马体在情景记忆和陈述性记忆中发挥广泛作用,而另一些人则主张其在创建空间认知地图和导航方面具有特定作用。尽管这两种观点都有可取之处,但都没有完整地解释海马体的功能。在最近试图弥合这些观点的综述的指导下,我们在此提出,可以从托尔曼(1948年)最初提出的认知地图概念的角度来探索海马体功能,从而实现调和。认知地图概念认为,认知地图可组织经验并指导跨所有认知领域的行为。我们强调最近在动物和人类身上进行的研究,这些研究表明,海马体网络支持广泛的认知地图领域,这些网络在与情境相关的地图背景下组织特定经验,并且网络活动模式反映了通过认知地图指导的行为。这些结果与一个框架一致,该框架通过将海马体概念化为在空间、时间和联想情境的多维认知地图背景下组织传入信息,从而弥合了海马体功能理论。
海马体功能的研究主要由两种主要观点主导。空间观点认为,海马体追踪空间中的路线,而记忆观点则表明其在陈述性记忆中发挥广泛作用。两种观点都有大量证据支持,但都没有完整地解释海马体的功能。在此,我们回顾证据表明,除了空间情境外,海马体还编码有关时间和情境背景的各种信息、有关抽象空间中事件的系统组织的信息以及有关认知和空间地图中的路线的信息。我们认为,这些发现跨越了记忆和空间观点的界限,并为海马体作为支持广泛认知地图的系统的功能提供了新的见解。