• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Firearm Injury Risk Prediction Among Children Transported by 9-1-1 Emergency Medical Services: A Machine Learning Analysis.911紧急医疗服务运送儿童时的枪支伤害风险预测:一项机器学习分析
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2025 Mar 1;41(3):195-202. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003314. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
2
Geospatial Clustering of 9-1-1 Responses for Pediatric Firearm Injuries Over Time.随时间推移的小儿枪支伤911响应的地理空间聚类分析
Pediatrics. 2025 Apr 1;155(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2024-068179.
3
Trends in EMS encounters and outcomes among children and adolescents with firearm injuries from 2018 to 2022.2018年至2022年期间儿童和青少年火器伤的紧急医疗服务接诊情况及结局趋势。
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Apr;90:55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.069. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
4
Estimating Nonfatal Gunshot Injury Locations With Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning Models.利用自然语言处理和机器学习模型估算非致命性枪伤位置
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2020664. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.20664.
5
Individual and Neighborhood Characteristics of Children Seeking Emergency Department Care for Firearm Injuries Within the PECARN Network.PECAN网络中因枪支伤害前往急诊科就诊儿童的个体及社区特征。
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Jul;24(7):803-813. doi: 10.1111/acem.13200. Epub 2017 May 29.
6
A machine-learning prediction model to identify risk of firearm injury using electronic health records data.利用电子健康记录数据建立机器学习预测模型识别枪支伤害风险
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Oct 1;31(10):2173-2180. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae222.
7
Incidence and circumstances of nonfatal firearm-related injuries among children and adolescents.儿童和青少年非致命性枪支相关伤害的发生率及情况。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Dec;155(12):1364-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.155.12.1364.
8
Patterns of Pediatric Firearm-Related Ocular Trauma in the United States.美国儿童与枪支相关的眼部创伤模式。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec 1;137(12):1363-1370. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3562.
9
Predictors and Outcomes of Pediatric Firearm Injuries Treated in the Emergency Department: Differences by Mechanism of Intent.急诊科治疗的儿童火器伤的预测因素和结局:按意图机制的差异
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;23(7):790-5. doi: 10.1111/acem.12986. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
10
Emergency Medical Services Encounters for Firearm Injuries - 858 Counties, United States, January 2019-September 2023.2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 9 月美国 858 个县因枪支受伤接受紧急医疗服务的情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2024 Jun 20;73(24):551-557. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7324a3.

本文引用的文献

1
TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods.TRIPOD+AI 声明:报告使用回归或机器学习方法的临床预测模型的更新指南。
BMJ. 2024 Apr 16;385:e078378. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078378.
2
Firearm Injuries In Children And Adolescents: Health And Economic Consequences Among Survivors And Family Members.儿童和青少年的枪支伤害:幸存者和家庭成员的健康和经济后果。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Nov;42(11):1541-1550. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00587.
3
Pediatric Firearm Injury Emergency Department Visits From 2017 to 2022: A Multicenter Study.2017 年至 2022 年儿科枪支伤害急诊就诊:一项多中心研究。
Pediatrics. 2023 Dec 1;152(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-063129.
4
Preventable tragedies: findings from the #NotAnAccident index of unintentional shootings by children.可预防的悲剧:儿童意外枪击事件“并非意外”指数的调查结果。
Inj Epidemiol. 2023 Oct 23;10(Suppl 1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40621-023-00464-3.
5
Machine Learning-Based Early Prediction of Sepsis Using Electronic Health Records: A Systematic Review.基于机器学习利用电子健康记录对脓毒症进行早期预测:一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 30;12(17):5658. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175658.
6
Trends in firearm production and firearm deaths in U.S. youth.美国青少年枪支生产与枪支死亡趋势
Prev Med. 2023 Oct;175:107684. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107684. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
7
Impact of firearm injury in children and adolescents on health care costs and use within a family.儿童和青少年枪支伤害对医疗保健费用的影响以及对家庭使用的影响。
Prev Med. 2023 Oct;175:107681. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107681. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
8
Trends and Disparities in Firearm Deaths Among Children.儿童枪支死亡的趋势和差异。
Pediatrics. 2023 Sep 1;152(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-061296.
9
Association Between Markers of Structural Racism and Mass Shooting Events in Major US Cities.美国主要城市结构性种族主义指标与大规模枪击事件之间的关联
JAMA Surg. 2023 Oct 1;158(10):1032-1039. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.2846.
10
The Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Violent Injuries in Children: A Literature Review.《COVID-19 大流行对儿童暴力伤害的影响:文献综述》。
Adv Pediatr. 2023 Aug;70(1):17-44. doi: 10.1016/j.yapd.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Apr 4.

911紧急医疗服务运送儿童时的枪支伤害风险预测:一项机器学习分析

Firearm Injury Risk Prediction Among Children Transported by 9-1-1 Emergency Medical Services: A Machine Learning Analysis.

作者信息

Newgard Craig D, Babcock Sean, Malveau Susan, Lin Amber, Goldstick Jason, Carter Patrick, Cook Jennifer N B, Song Xubo, Wei Ran, Salvi Apoorva, Fallat Mary E, Kuppermann Nathan, Jenkins Peter C, Fein Joel A, Mann N Clay

机构信息

Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

Institute for Firearm Injury Prevention, Injury Prevention Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2025 Mar 1;41(3):195-202. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003314. Epub 2024 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003314
PMID:39665554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11867878/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Among children transported by ambulance across the United States, we used machine learning models to develop a risk prediction tool for firearm injury using basic demographic information and home ZIP code matched to publicly available data sources.

METHODS

We included children and adolescents 0-17 years transported by ambulance to acute care hospitals in 47 states from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2022. We used 96 predictors, including basic demographic information and neighborhood measures matched to home ZIP code from 5 data sources: EMS records, American Community Survey, Child Opportunity Index, County Health Rankings, and Social Vulnerability Index. We separated children into 0-10 years (preadolescent) and 11-17 years (adolescent) cohorts and used machine learning to develop high-specificity risk prediction models for each age group to minimize false positives.

RESULTS

There were 6,191,909 children transported by ambulance, including 21,625 (0.35%) with firearm injuries. Among children 0-10 years (n = 3,149,430 children, 2,840 [0.09%] with firearm injuries), the model had 95.1% specificity, 22.4% sensitivity, area under the curve 0.761, and positive predictive value 0.41% for identifying children with firearm injuries. Among adolescents 11-17 years (n = 3,042,479 children, 18,785 [0.62%] with firearm injuries), the model had 94.8% specificity, 39.0% sensitivity, area under the curve 0.818, and positive predictive value 4.47% for identifying patients with firearm injury. There were 7 high-yield predictors among children and 3 predictors among adolescents, with little overlap.

CONCLUSIONS

Among pediatric patients transported by ambulance, basic demographic information and neighborhood measures can identify children and adolescents at elevated risk of firearm injuries, which may guide focused injury prevention resources and interventions.

摘要

目的

在美国通过救护车转运的儿童中,我们使用机器学习模型,利用基本人口统计信息和与公开可用数据源匹配的家庭邮政编码,开发一种枪支伤害风险预测工具。

方法

我们纳入了2014年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间在47个州通过救护车转运至急诊医院的0至17岁儿童和青少年。我们使用了96个预测因素,包括基本人口统计信息以及从5个数据源(紧急医疗服务记录、美国社区调查、儿童机会指数、县卫生排名和社会脆弱性指数)与家庭邮政编码匹配的邻里指标。我们将儿童分为0至10岁(青春期前)和11至17岁(青少年)队列,并使用机器学习为每个年龄组开发高特异性风险预测模型,以尽量减少假阳性。

结果

共有6,191,909名儿童通过救护车转运,其中21,625名(0.35%)有枪支伤害。在0至10岁的儿童中(n = 3,149,430名儿童,2,840名[0.09%]有枪支伤害),该模型在识别有枪支伤害的儿童时,特异性为95.1%,敏感性为22.4%,曲线下面积为0.761,阳性预测值为0.41%。在11至17岁的青少年中(n = 3,042,479名儿童,18,785名[0.62%]有枪支伤害),该模型在识别有枪支伤害的患者时,特异性为94.8%,敏感性为39.0%,曲线下面积为0.818,阳性预测值为4.47%。儿童中有7个高收益预测因素,青少年中有3个预测因素,重叠较少。

结论

在通过救护车转运的儿科患者中,基本人口统计信息和邻里指标可以识别出枪支伤害风险较高的儿童和青少年,这可能有助于指导有针对性的伤害预防资源和干预措施。