Corfield Thomas, Higgins Denice
Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
South Australian Forensic Odontology Unit, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Dec;10(6):e70052. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70052.
Understanding human tooth structure fluorescence aids clinical and forensic dentistry, enabling tissue/material differentiation and the creation of esthetic restorative materials. Material manufacturers seek to replicate natural tooth fluorescence, necessitating the development of novel techniques to detect them. Procuring human teeth for research is challenging due to ethical and infection control standards, prompting a search for alternative models.
This study compares visible light-induced fluorescence of porcine and human teeth to assess the value of porcine teeth as human analogs. Using a pulsed laser, an optimal fluorescence-inducing wavelength was determined, followed by comparing fluorescence spectra between species.
Luminescence sensitivity and lifetimes were comparable between species, but spectral geometry differed.
Porcine teeth, commonly used for dental material investigations, may not be suitable for dental fluorescence studies due to spectral differences. Accurately mimicking human tooth fluorescence remains complex. Further research is needed to develop reliable alternatives for dental fluorescence investigations that will advance clinical and forensic dentistry.
了解人类牙齿结构荧光有助于临床牙科和法医牙科,能够实现组织/材料鉴别以及美学修复材料的创制。材料制造商试图复制天然牙齿荧光,这就需要开发新的技术来检测它们。由于伦理和感染控制标准,获取用于研究的人类牙齿具有挑战性,促使人们寻找替代模型。
本研究比较了猪牙和人类牙齿的可见光诱导荧光,以评估猪牙作为人类牙齿类似物的价值。使用脉冲激光确定了最佳荧光诱导波长,随后比较了不同物种之间的荧光光谱。
不同物种之间的发光灵敏度和寿命相当,但光谱几何形状不同。
由于光谱差异,常用于牙科材料研究的猪牙可能不适用于牙齿荧光研究。准确模拟人类牙齿荧光仍然很复杂。需要进一步研究以开发用于牙齿荧光研究的可靠替代方法,这将推动临床牙科和法医牙科的发展。