Manchester Kieran R, Roberts Debbie
School of Nursing and Healthcare Leadership, University of Bradford, UK.
School of Nursing and Healthcare Leadership, University of Bradford, UK.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2025 Jan;82:104226. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104226. Epub 2024 Dec 8.
To explore the teaching and learning methods used in bioscience education for undergraduate nursing students and evaluate their effectiveness for knowledge acquisition and student satisfaction.
Understanding bioscience is essential for nurses to provide effective patient care. Despite its importance, students often struggle with the complex content and limited learning time.
A mixed-methods systematic review was employed following the PRISMA guidelines.
Four databases (CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science and PubMed) were searched using keywords related to nursing education and bioscience. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed studies published from 2003 to 2023 that evaluated teaching or learning methods for bioscience in undergraduate nursing students. A narrative synthesis was conducted.
This review includes 98 studies from 28 countries. Active learning methods generally improved student engagement, understanding, and retention of knowledge. Technology-enhanced learning provided immersive and interactive experiences, despite cost and scalability challenges. Traditional teaching methods were valued by students for their insights and application to clinical practice. Blended learning approaches catered to diverse learning preferences and improved learning.
Most teaching and learning approaches appear to improve bioscience education for undergraduate nursing students, supporting short-term improvements in knowledge and student satisfaction. No single active learning method was identified as the most effective. Effective support and learning opportunities both in and out of the classroom are important, as are strategies to allow application of theory to practice. Future research should further evaluate the long-term impact of different teaching and learning methods for bioscience in undergraduate nursing education.
探讨本科护理专业学生生物科学教育中所采用的教学方法,并评估这些方法在知识获取和学生满意度方面的有效性。
理解生物科学对于护士提供有效的患者护理至关重要。尽管其重要性,但学生常常在复杂的内容和有限的学习时间方面面临困难。
遵循PRISMA指南进行了一项混合方法的系统评价。
使用与护理教育和生物科学相关的关键词在四个数据库(CINAHL、Medline、科学网和PubMed)中进行检索。纳入标准聚焦于2003年至2023年发表的同行评审研究,这些研究评估了本科护理专业学生生物科学的教学或学习方法。进行了叙述性综合分析。
本综述纳入了来自28个国家的98项研究。主动学习方法通常能提高学生的参与度、理解能力和知识保留率。尽管存在成本和可扩展性挑战,但技术增强型学习提供了沉浸式和交互式体验。传统教学方法因其对临床实践的见解和应用而受到学生重视。混合学习方法迎合了不同的学习偏好并提高了学习效果。
大多数教学方法似乎都能改善本科护理专业学生的生物科学教育,支持知识和学生满意度的短期提升。没有一种主动学习方法被确定为最有效。课堂内外有效的支持和学习机会很重要,将理论应用于实践的策略也同样重要。未来的研究应进一步评估不同教学方法对本科护理教育中生物科学的长期影响。