School of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Province, China.
School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Jul;138:106189. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106189. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of virtual reality technology in nursing education.
Virtual reality technology is regarded as one of the advanced and significant instructional tools in contemporary education. However, its effectiveness in nursing education remains a subject of debate, and there is currently limited comprehensive research discussing the impact of varying degrees of virtual technology on the educational effectiveness of nursing students.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
The present systematic review and meta-analysis were applied according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for relevant articles in the English language. The methodologies of the studies evaluated were assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias2 (ROB 2) tool and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) assessment tool. We took the learning satisfaction, knowledge, and skill performance of nursing students as the primary outcomes, and nursing students' self-efficacy, learning motivation, cognitive load, clinical reasoning, and communication ability were assessment as secondary outcomes. The meta-analysis was performed using R 4.3.2 software according to PRISMA guidelines. Heterogeneity was assessed by I and P statistics. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effective indicators.
Twenty-six studies were reviewed, which involved 1815 nursing students. The results showed that virtual reality teaching, especially immersive virtual reality, was effective in improving nursing students' learning satisfaction (SMD: 0.82, 95%CI: 0.53-1.11, P < 0.001), knowledge (SMD: 0.56, 95%CI: 0.34-0.77, P < 0.001), skill performance (SMD: 1.13, 95 % CI: 0.68-1.57, P < 0.001), and self-efficacy (SMD: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.21,1.07, P < 0.001) compared to traditional teaching methods. However, the effects of virtual reality technology on nursing students' motivation, cognitive load, clinical reasoning, and communication ability were not significant and require further research.
The results of this study show that virtual reality technology has a positive impact on nursing students. Nonetheless, it is crucial not to underestimate the effectiveness of traditional education methods, and future research could analyze the impact of different populations on nursing education while improving virtual reality technology, to more comprehensively explore how to improve the quality of nursing education. Moreover, it is imperative to emphasize the integration of virtual education interventions with real-world experiences promptly. This integration is essential for bridging the gap between the virtual learning environment and real-life scenarios effectively.
CRD42023420497 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails).
本研究旨在分析虚拟现实技术在护理教育中的有效性。
虚拟现实技术被认为是当代教育中先进和重要的教学工具之一。然而,其在护理教育中的有效性仍是一个有争议的问题,目前关于不同程度的虚拟技术对护理学生教育效果的综合研究还很有限。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
本系统评价和荟萃分析按照 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses(PRISMA)声明进行。在英文数据库 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、ProQuest、Cochrane Library、Web of Science 和 Scopus 中搜索相关文章。使用 Cochrane 风险偏倚 2(ROB 2)工具和 Joanna Briggs 研究所(JBI)评估工具评估研究方法。我们将护理学生的学习满意度、知识和技能表现作为主要结果,将护理学生的自我效能感、学习动机、认知负荷、临床推理和沟通能力作为次要结果进行评估。根据 PRISMA 指南,使用 R 4.3.2 软件进行荟萃分析。使用 I ²和 P 统计量评估异质性。标准化均数差(SMD)和 95%置信区间(CI)用作有效指标。
共纳入 26 项研究,涉及 1815 名护理学生。结果表明,与传统教学方法相比,虚拟现实教学,特别是沉浸式虚拟现实,在提高护理学生的学习满意度(SMD:0.82,95%CI:0.53-1.11,P<0.001)、知识(SMD:0.56,95%CI:0.34-0.77,P<0.001)、技能表现(SMD:1.13,95%CI:0.68-1.57,P<0.001)和自我效能感(SMD:0.64,95%CI:0.21,1.07,P<0.001)方面具有积极作用。然而,虚拟现实技术对护理学生的动机、认知负荷、临床推理和沟通能力的影响并不显著,需要进一步研究。
本研究结果表明,虚拟现实技术对护理学生有积极影响。然而,不应低估传统教育方法的有效性,未来的研究可以分析不同人群对护理教育的影响,同时改进虚拟现实技术,更全面地探讨如何提高护理教育质量。此外,强调虚拟教育干预与现实世界经验的即时整合至关重要。这种整合对于有效弥合虚拟学习环境与现实场景之间的差距至关重要。
CRD42023420497(https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails)。