• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血不良结局的机器学习:一项涉及8445名参与者的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Machine learning for predicting poor outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis involving 8445 participants.

作者信息

Mohammadzadeh Ibrahim, Niroomand Behnaz, Shahnazian Zahra, Ghanbarnia Ramin, Nouri Zahra, Tajerian Amin, Choubineh Tannaz, Najafi Masoud, Mohammadzadeh Shahin, Soltani Reza, Keshavarzi Arya, Keshtkar Abbasali, Mousavinejad Seyed Ali

机构信息

Skull Base Research Center, Loghman-Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Skull Base Research Center, Loghman-Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2025 Feb;249:108668. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108668. Epub 2024 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108668
PMID:39667223
Abstract

Early prediction of poor outcomes in patients impacted with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is crucial for timely intervention and effective management. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting poor outcomes in patients with aSAH, assessing their sensitivity, specificity, and other algorithm metrics. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of science and Cochrane library conducted to identify eligible studies. We extracted data on sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, F1score and area under the curve (AUC) from the included studies. Out of 2238 studies screened, 12 met our eligibility criteria involving ML approaches in patients with confirmed aSAH. ML algorithms, particularly XGBoost and CatBoost, offer promising performance for predicting poor outcomes in aSAH patients. Meta-analysis was performed on 12 studies resulted in a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 [95 % CI: 0.76-0.94], specificity of 0.78 [95 % CI 0.66-0.86], positive DLR of 3.91 [95 % CI: 2.42-6.30], negative DLR of 0.16 [95 % CI: 0.07-0.34], diagnostic odds ratio of 24.9 [95 % CI: 7.97-77.82], the diagnostic score of 3.21[95 % CI: 2.08-4.35], and the area AUC was 0.82, indicating substantial diagnostic performance. However, conventional LR showed slightly superior predictive function compared to ML algorithms. These findings underscore the potential of ML algorithms to significantly advance the predictability of poor outcomes in patients with aSAH, suggesting that ML can play a critical role in enhancing clinical decision-making.

摘要

对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)患者不良预后进行早期预测,对于及时干预和有效管理至关重要。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估机器学习(ML)算法在预测aSAH患者不良预后方面的性能,评估其敏感性、特异性和其他算法指标。通过全面检索PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Web of science和Cochrane图书馆来识别符合条件的研究。我们从纳入的研究中提取了关于敏感性、特异性、准确性、精确性、F1评分和曲线下面积(AUC)的数据。在筛选的2238项研究中,有12项符合我们的纳入标准,涉及确诊aSAH患者的ML方法。ML算法,特别是XGBoost和CatBoost,在预测aSAH患者不良预后方面表现出良好的性能。对12项研究进行荟萃分析,得出合并敏感性为0.88 [95% CI:0.76 - 0.94],特异性为0.78 [95% CI 0.66 - 0.86],阳性似然比为3.91 [95% CI:2.42 - 6.30],阴性似然比为0.16 [95% CI:0.07 - 0.34],诊断比值比为24.9 [95% CI:7.97 - 77.82],诊断评分为3.21[95% CI:2.08 - 4.35],AUC面积为0.82,表明具有显著的诊断性能。然而,传统逻辑回归与ML算法相比显示出略优的预测功能。这些发现强调了ML算法在显著提高aSAH患者不良预后预测能力方面的潜力,表明ML在加强临床决策中可以发挥关键作用。

相似文献

1
Machine learning for predicting poor outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis involving 8445 participants.用于预测动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血不良结局的机器学习:一项涉及8445名参与者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2025 Feb;249:108668. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108668. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
2
Prediction of prognosis in COVID-19 patients using machine learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis.使用机器学习预测 COVID-19 患者的预后:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Sep;177:105151. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105151. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
3
Prediction of recurrence after surgery for pituitary adenoma using machine learning- based models: systematic review and meta-analysis.基于机器学习模型预测垂体腺瘤手术后的复发:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Endocr Disord. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12902-025-01955-8.
4
Accuracy of Machine Learning in Discriminating Kawasaki Disease and Other Febrile Illnesses: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器学习在鉴别川崎病和其他发热性疾病中的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 18;26:e57641. doi: 10.2196/57641.
5
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
6
Diagnostic test accuracy of machine learning algorithms for the detection intracranial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis study.机器学习算法检测颅内出血的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析研究。
Biomed Eng Online. 2023 Dec 4;22(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12938-023-01172-1.
7
Predictive Performance of Machine Learning for Suicide in Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器学习对青少年自杀的预测性能:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 16;27:e73052. doi: 10.2196/73052.
8
The Machine Learning Models in Major Cardiovascular Adverse Events Prediction Based on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Systematic Review.基于冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术的主要心血管不良事件预测中的机器学习模型:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 13;27:e68872. doi: 10.2196/68872.
9
Blood biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.用于子宫内膜异位症无创诊断的血液生物标志物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 1;2016(5):CD012179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012179.
10
The performance of machine learning for predicting the recurrent stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis on 24,350 patients.机器学习预测复发性中风的性能:对24350例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析
Acta Neurol Belg. 2024 Nov 7. doi: 10.1007/s13760-024-02682-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning-based models and radiomics: can they be reliable predictors for meningioma recurrence? A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于机器学习的模型与放射组学:它们能否成为脑膜瘤复发的可靠预测指标?一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Aug 27;48(1):623. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03744-2.
2
Using machine learning to predict remission after surgery for pituitary adenoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用机器学习预测垂体腺瘤手术后的缓解情况:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endocrine. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s12020-025-04351-3.
3
Neuron-specific enolase: a potential biomarker in the prediction of pediatric head trauma outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
神经元特异性烯醇化酶:预测小儿头部创伤预后的潜在生物标志物:系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 1;18(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00932-1.
4
Prediction of recurrence after surgery for pituitary adenoma using machine learning- based models: systematic review and meta-analysis.基于机器学习模型预测垂体腺瘤手术后的复发:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Endocr Disord. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12902-025-01955-8.
5
Machine learning models in the prediction of chronic or shunt-dependent hydrocephalus following subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器学习模型在预测蛛网膜下腔出血后慢性或分流依赖性脑积水方面的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuroradiol J. 2025 May 22:19714009251345104. doi: 10.1177/19714009251345104.
6
Neutrophil-to-albumin ratio as a predictor of mortality in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.中性粒细胞与白蛋白比值作为脑出血患者死亡率的预测指标:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
BMC Neurol. 2025 May 16;25(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04220-6.
7
Predicting the efficacy of bevacizumab on peritumoral edema based on imaging features and machine learning.基于影像学特征和机器学习预测贝伐单抗对瘤周水肿的疗效
Sci Rep. 2025 May 8;15(1):15990. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00758-0.