Fazio-Eynullayeva Elnara, Cunnington Marianne, Mystkowski Paul, Lv Lei, Aly Abdalla, Yee Christopher W, Desai Raj, Liu Chia-Lun, Duh Mei Sheng, Mattke Soeren
Novo Nordisk Inc., Plainsboro, NJ, USA.
Analysis Group Ltd., London, UK.
J Med Econ. 2025 Dec;28(1):81-88. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2442240. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
To compare all-cause and Alzheimer's disease (AD)-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) by cognitive stage.
This retrospective study analyzed insurance claims data linked to electronic health records (01/01/2015-12/31/2021). Patients with ≥1 cognitive assessment (Mini-Mental State Examination or Montreal Cognitive Assessment) and ≥1 medical or pharmacy claim for an AD diagnosis or AD medications were included. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to address potential confounding. All-cause and AD-related HCRU were summarized per patient per year (PPPY) and compared between early AD and advanced AD cohorts (defined according to cognitive scores) using generalized linear regression models; adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported.
A total of 193 patients were included (median age: 82 years; 63.2% female), 108 with early AD and 85 with advanced AD, with similar mean follow up. All-cause HCRU, on average, was similar between early AD and advanced AD cohorts (37.4 PPPY and 38.9 encounters PPPY, respectively). For AD-related HCRU, patients with early AD had fewer encounters PPPY, on average, than patients with advanced AD (1.26 and 3.88 encounters, respectively). Following IPTW adjustment, the advanced AD cohort had significantly higher overall AD-related HCRU (IRR: 3.64 [95% CI: 1.96-6.75], < 0.001) and outpatient visits (IRR: 2.76 [95% CI: 1.68-4.54], < 0.001) compared to the early AD cohort.
The relatively small sample size of patients with linked claims and cognitive score data limited the ability to assess contribution of all encounter types to HCRU trends, as well as generalizability to the broader AD population.
Although all-cause HCRU was similar, patients with advanced AD incurred higher AD-related HCRU compared to patients living with early AD. Further research is needed to determine whether interventions earlier in disease progression can mitigate the AD-related healthcare burden for patients with advanced AD.
按认知阶段比较全因性和阿尔茨海默病(AD)相关的医疗资源利用(HCRU)情况。
这项回顾性研究分析了与电子健康记录相关的保险理赔数据(2015年1月1日至2021年12月31日)。纳入了进行过≥1次认知评估(简易精神状态检查表或蒙特利尔认知评估)且有≥1次AD诊断或AD药物的医疗或药房理赔记录的患者。采用治疗权重逆概率法(IPTW)来处理潜在的混杂因素。全因性和AD相关的HCRU按每位患者每年(PPPY)进行汇总,并使用广义线性回归模型在早期AD队列和晚期AD队列(根据认知分数定义)之间进行比较;报告调整后的发病率比(IRR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
总共纳入了193名患者(中位年龄:82岁;63.2%为女性),其中108例为早期AD患者,85例为晚期AD患者,平均随访时间相似。早期AD队列和晚期AD队列的全因性HCRU平均相似(分别为37.4次PPPY和38.9次就诊PPPY)。对于AD相关的HCRU,早期AD患者的平均每年就诊次数比晚期AD患者少(分别为1.26次和3.88次就诊)。经过IPTW调整后,与早期AD队列相比,晚期AD队列的总体AD相关HCRU显著更高(IRR:3.64 [95% CI:1.96 - 6.75],P < 0.001),门诊就诊次数也更高(IRR:2.76 [95% CI:1.68 - 4.54],P < 0.001)。
具有关联理赔和认知分数数据的患者样本量相对较小,限制了评估所有就诊类型对HCRU趋势的贡献以及对更广泛AD人群的可推广性的能力。
尽管全因性HCRU相似,但与早期AD患者相比,晚期AD患者的AD相关HCRU更高。需要进一步研究以确定在疾病进展早期进行干预是否可以减轻晚期AD患者的AD相关医疗负担。