• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放式助听器处理延迟偏好背后的个体差异。

Individual Differences Underlying Preference for Processing Delay in Open-Fit Hearing Aids.

作者信息

Súsonnudóttir Borgný, Kowalewski Borys, Stiefenhofer Georg, Neher Tobias

机构信息

Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Technical Audiology Section, Research Unit for ORL - Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital & University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241298613. doi: 10.1177/23312165241298613.

DOI:10.1177/23312165241298613
PMID:39668739
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11638989/
Abstract

In open-fit digital hearing aids (HAs), the processing delay influences comb-filter effects that arise from the interaction of the processed HA sound with the unprocessed direct sound. The current study investigated potential relations between preferred processing delay, spectral and temporal processing abilities, and self-reported listening habits. Ten listeners with normal hearing and 20 listeners with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing impairments participated. Using a HA simulator, delay preference was assessed with a paired-comparison task, three types of stimuli, and five processing delays (0, 0.5, 2, 5, and 10 ms). Spectral processing was assessed with a spectral ripple discrimination (SRD) task. Temporal processing was assessed with a gap detection task. Self-reported listening habits were assessed using a shortened version of the 'sound preference and hearing habits' questionnaire. A linear mixed-effects model showed a strong effect of processing delay on preference scores ( < .001, = 0.30). Post-hoc comparisons revealed no differences between either the two shortest delays or the three longer delays (all  > .05) but a clear difference between the two sets of delays ( < .001). A multiple linear regression analysis showed SRD to be a significant predictor of delay preference ( < .01, = 0.29), with good spectral processing abilities being associated with a preference for short processing delay. Overall, these results indicate that assessing spectral processing abilities can guide the prescription of open-fit HAs.

摘要

在开放式数字助听器(HA)中,处理延迟会影响由处理后的HA声音与未处理的直达声音相互作用产生的梳状滤波效应。本研究调查了偏好的处理延迟、频谱和时间处理能力以及自我报告的听力习惯之间的潜在关系。十名听力正常的听众和二十名轻度至中度感音神经性听力障碍的听众参与了研究。使用HA模拟器,通过配对比较任务、三种类型的刺激和五种处理延迟(0、0.5、2、5和10毫秒)来评估延迟偏好。通过频谱纹波辨别(SRD)任务评估频谱处理能力。通过间隙检测任务评估时间处理能力。使用“声音偏好和听力习惯”问卷的简化版评估自我报告的听力习惯。线性混合效应模型显示处理延迟对偏好分数有强烈影响(<0.001,R² = 0.30)。事后比较显示,两个最短延迟之间或三个较长延迟之间均无差异(所有p > 0.05),但两组延迟之间存在明显差异(<0.001)。多元线性回归分析显示,SRD是延迟偏好的重要预测指标(<0.01,R² = 0.29),良好的频谱处理能力与对短处理延迟的偏好相关。总体而言,这些结果表明,评估频谱处理能力可以指导开放式HA的处方。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3562/11638989/a5d5db9ab33a/10.1177_23312165241298613-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3562/11638989/ebbd09196b2f/10.1177_23312165241298613-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3562/11638989/12afd63f0861/10.1177_23312165241298613-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3562/11638989/756724d2681c/10.1177_23312165241298613-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3562/11638989/f3546e3b929f/10.1177_23312165241298613-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3562/11638989/53481d223ab5/10.1177_23312165241298613-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3562/11638989/97010b0b0a24/10.1177_23312165241298613-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3562/11638989/87abbe85aa43/10.1177_23312165241298613-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3562/11638989/a5d5db9ab33a/10.1177_23312165241298613-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3562/11638989/ebbd09196b2f/10.1177_23312165241298613-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3562/11638989/12afd63f0861/10.1177_23312165241298613-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3562/11638989/756724d2681c/10.1177_23312165241298613-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3562/11638989/f3546e3b929f/10.1177_23312165241298613-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3562/11638989/53481d223ab5/10.1177_23312165241298613-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3562/11638989/97010b0b0a24/10.1177_23312165241298613-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3562/11638989/87abbe85aa43/10.1177_23312165241298613-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3562/11638989/a5d5db9ab33a/10.1177_23312165241298613-fig8.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual Differences Underlying Preference for Processing Delay in Open-Fit Hearing Aids.开放式助听器处理延迟偏好背后的个体差异。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241298613. doi: 10.1177/23312165241298613.
2
Benefit of Hearing-Aid Amplification and Signal Enhancement for Speech Reception in Complex Listening Situations.助听放大和信号增强对复杂聆听环境下言语感知的益处。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241271407. doi: 10.1177/23312165241271407.
3
Bilateral versus unilateral hearing aids for bilateral hearing impairment in adults.成人双侧听力障碍使用双侧助听器与单侧助听器的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 19;12(12):CD012665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012665.pub2.
4
The Impact of Hearing Aids on Listening Effort and Listening-Related Fatigue - Investigations in a Virtual Realistic Listening Environment.助听器对听力努力和听力疲劳的影响 - 在虚拟现实聆听环境中的研究。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241265199. doi: 10.1177/23312165241265199.
5
Evaluation of Speaker-Conditioned Target Speaker Extraction Algorithms for Hearing-Impaired Listeners.针对听力受损听众的说话者条件目标说话者提取算法评估
Trends Hear. 2025 Jan-Dec;29:23312165251365802. doi: 10.1177/23312165251365802. Epub 2025 Aug 11.
6
Automated Measurement of Speech Recognition, Reaction Time, and Speech Rate and Their Relation to Self-Reported Listening Effort for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using various Maskers.使用不同掩蔽噪声对正常听力和听力障碍者的言语识别率、反应时、言语率的自动测量及其与自我报告的听力努力度的关系。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241276435. doi: 10.1177/23312165241276435.
7
Characterizing the relationship between modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution in cochlear implant users.描述人工耳蜗使用者调制灵敏度和音高分辨率之间的关系。
Hear Res. 2024 Jul;448:109026. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109026. Epub 2024 May 16.
8
Hearing Instruments for Unilateral Severe-to-Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成人单侧重度至极重度感音神经性听力损失的听力仪器:系统评价与荟萃分析
Ear Hear. 2016 Sep-Oct;37(5):495-507. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000313.
9
Impact of Hearing Aids on Language Outcomes in Preschool Children With Mild Bilateral Hearing Loss.助听器对轻度双侧听力损失学龄前儿童语言发育的影响。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241256721. doi: 10.1177/23312165241256721.
10
Sequential auditory grouping reduces binaural pitch fusion in listeners with normal hearing, hearing aids, and cochlear implantsa).正常听力者、助听器使用者和人工耳蜗植入者的连续听觉分组可减少双耳融合音。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Nov 1;156(5):3217-3231. doi: 10.1121/10.0034366.

本文引用的文献

1
The Audible Contrast Threshold (ACT) test: A clinical spectro-temporal modulation detection test.可听对比阈(ACT)测试:一种临床频谱-时变调制检测测试。
Hear Res. 2024 Nov;453:109103. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109103. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
2
Hearing aid delay in open-fit devices: Preferred sound quality in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.开放式设备中助听器的延迟:正常和听力受损的听众对音质的偏好。
JASA Express Lett. 2022 Oct;2(10):104803. doi: 10.1121/10.0014950.
3
Revisiting Auditory Profiling: Can Cognitive Factors Improve the Prediction of Aided Speech-in-Noise Outcome?
重新审视听觉分析:认知因素能否提高助听噪声下言语感知的预测效果?
Trends Hear. 2022 Jan-Dec;26:23312165221113889. doi: 10.1177/23312165221113889.
4
Hearing aid delay in open-fit devices - coloration-pitch discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired.开放式助听器的延迟 - 正常听力和听力受损者的音色 - 音高辨别
Int J Audiol. 2023 May;62(5):424-432. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2049380. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
5
Perception of One's Own Voice After Hearing-Aid Fitting for Naive Hearing-Aid Users and Hearing-Aid Refitting for Experienced Hearing-Aid Users.初次使用助听器者和有经验的助听器使用者在适应助听器后的自身言语感知评估。
Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec;24:2331216520932467. doi: 10.1177/2331216520932467.
6
Perceptual Evaluation of Signal-to-Noise-Ratio-Aware Dynamic Range Compression in Hearing Aids.助听设备中基于信噪比感知的动态范围压缩的感知评估。
Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec;24:2331216520930531. doi: 10.1177/2331216520930531.
7
MarkeTrak 10 (MT10) Survey Results Demonstrate High Satisfaction with and Benefits from Hearing Aids.MarkeTrak 10(MT10)调查结果显示对助听器的满意度很高且受益良多。
Semin Hear. 2020 Feb;41(1):21-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701243. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
8
Factors Influencing Hearing Aid Adoption.影响助听器采用的因素。
Semin Hear. 2020 Feb;41(1):6-20. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701242. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
9
Tolerable delay for speech production and perception: effects of hearing ability and experience with hearing aids.言语产生与感知的可耐受延迟:听力能力及使用助听器经验的影响
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jan;57(1):61-68. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1367848. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
10
Development and psychometric properties of the sound preference and hearing habits questionnaire (SP-HHQ).声音偏好与听力习惯问卷(SP-HHQ)的编制及心理测量学特性
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jun;57(sup3):S118-S129. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1248795. Epub 2016 Nov 22.