Bouis Howarth, Foley Jennifer, Lividini Keith, Jumrani Jaya, Reinke Russell, Van Der Straeten Dominique, Zagado Ronan, Boy Erick, Brown Lynn R, Mudyahoto Bho, Alioma Richard, Hussain Munawar, Pfeiffer Wolfgang H
International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
HarvestPlus, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Curr Dev Nutr. 2024 Oct 19;8(12):104478. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104478. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Biofortification was coined as a term to define a plant breeding strategy to increase the micronutrient content of staple food crops to reduce the burden of micronutrient deficiencies in low- and middle-income countries. In 2003, the HarvestPlus program, based in the centers comprising the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, was initiated to implement the biofortification strategy. This article discusses what has been achieved, what has been learned, and the key challenges to embed biofortification in food systems and to expand its impact. Cost-effectiveness is key to the biofortification strategy. Biofortification piggybacks on the agronomically superior varieties being developed at agricultural research centers. Central plant breeding research discoveries can be spread globally. Farmers have every motivation to adopt the latest high-yielding, high profit crops. High productivity leads to lower food prices. As a consequence, consumers can increase their mineral and vitamin intakes at no additional cost by substituting biofortified staple foods 1-for-1 for nonbiofortified staple foods. After 20 years of investment, biofortified staple food crops are being produced by farmers in over 40 countries and are eaten by hundreds of millions of people. Published nutrition trials have shown nutrient-rich crops to be efficacious. The biofortification strategy is now recognized by the international nutrition community as one effective approach among several interventions needed to reduce micronutrient deficiencies. This is a promising beginning. However, biofortification is still a newly emerging technology. A limitation of biofortification as implemented to date is that densities of single nutrients have been increased in given staple food crops. To reach a higher trajectory, the impacts of biofortification can be multiplied several-fold using genetic engineering and other advanced crop development techniques to combine multiple-nutrient densities with climate-smart traits.
生物强化这一术语被用来定义一种植物育种策略,旨在提高主食作物的微量营养素含量,以减轻低收入和中等收入国家微量营养素缺乏的负担。2003年,总部位于国际农业研究磋商组织各中心的“收获plus”计划启动,以实施生物强化策略。本文讨论了已取得的成果、学到的经验以及将生物强化纳入粮食系统并扩大其影响所面临的关键挑战。成本效益是生物强化策略的关键。生物强化借助农业研究中心培育的农艺性状优良的品种得以实现。植物育种核心研究成果能够在全球范围内推广。农民有充分的动力采用最新的高产、高利润作物。高生产率会降低食品价格。因此,消费者通过用生物强化主食等量替代非生物强化主食,无需额外付费就能增加矿物质和维生素的摄入量。经过20年的投资,40多个国家的农民正在种植生物强化主食作物,数亿人食用这些作物。已发表的营养试验表明,营养丰富的作物是有效的。生物强化策略现已被国际营养界公认为是减少微量营养素缺乏所需的多种干预措施中的一种有效方法。这是一个良好的开端。然而,生物强化仍然是一项新兴技术。迄今为止,生物强化的一个局限性在于,特定主食作物中单一营养素的含量有所提高。为了实现更高的目标,可以利用基因工程和其他先进的作物培育技术,将多种营养素含量与适应气候变化的性状相结合,从而使生物强化的影响成倍增加。