Boydell Victoria, Wright Kelsey Quinn, Elnakib Shatha, Galavotti Christine
University College London, London, England, UK.
University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.
Gates Open Res. 2025 Feb 28;8:1. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.15078.1. eCollection 2024.
Understanding people's interest in using modern contraception is critical to ensuring programs align with people's preferences and needs. Current measures of demand for contraception are misinterpreted. More direct measures of intention to use (ITU) contraception do exist but remain underexplored. This systematic review examines the relationship between intention to use and actual use of contraception.
We searched PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Collaboration to identify studies published from 1975-2020 that: (1) examined contraceptive behaviour, (2) included measures of ITU and future contraceptive use, and (3) included at least one quantitative measure of association between ITU and actual use. The inclusion criteria were: 1) examined contraceptive behaviour (excluding condom use only), (2) included disaggregated integral measures of ITU contraceptives and later contraceptive use, (3) included at least one quantitative measure of the association between ITU contraceptives and actual contraceptive use, (4) study population was women of reproductive age, (5) were peer-reviewed, and (6) written in English.
10 prospective cohort studies met the inclusion criteria; these provided 28,749 person-years of data (N=10,925). Although we could pool the data for unadjusted odds ratios, a metanalysis was not possible. We calculated that 6 of the 10 studies indicated significant, increased, unadjusted odds of subsequent contraceptive use after reporting ITU. Of those, 3 study analyses reported significant, positive adjusted odds ratios for the relationship between intention to use and later contraceptive use across varying covariates. The range of confounding factors, particularly around sub-populations, points to the need for more research so that a meta-analysis can be done in the future.
People's self-reported ITU contraception has the potential to be a strong predictor of subsequent contraceptive use. Few studies directly examined the relationship between ITU and contraceptive uptake and recruitment was primarily pregnant or postpartum samples.
了解人们对使用现代避孕方法的兴趣对于确保项目符合人们的偏好和需求至关重要。当前对避孕需求的衡量存在误解。确实存在更直接的使用意愿(ITU)避孕措施,但仍未得到充分探索。本系统评价研究了使用意愿与实际避孕使用之间的关系。
我们检索了PubMed、PsycInfo、科学网和考克兰协作网,以识别1975年至2020年发表的研究,这些研究:(1)考察了避孕行为,(2)包括使用意愿和未来避孕使用的测量,(3)包括至少一项使用意愿与实际使用之间关联的定量测量。纳入标准为:1)考察了避孕行为(不包括仅使用避孕套),(2)包括使用意愿避孕措施和后来避孕使用的分类综合测量,(3)包括至少一项使用意愿避孕措施与实际避孕使用之间关联的定量测量,(4)研究人群为育龄妇女,(5)经过同行评审,(6)用英语撰写。
10项前瞻性队列研究符合纳入标准;这些研究提供了28749人年的数据(N = 10925)。虽然我们可以汇总未调整优势比的数据,但无法进行荟萃分析。我们计算得出,10项研究中有6项表明,在报告使用意愿后,后续避孕使用的未调整优势显著增加。其中,3项研究分析报告了在不同协变量下,使用意愿与后来避孕使用之间关系的显著正调整优势比。混杂因素的范围,特别是在亚人群周围,表明需要更多研究,以便未来能够进行荟萃分析。
人们自我报告的使用意愿避孕有可能成为后续避孕使用的有力预测指标。很少有研究直接考察使用意愿与避孕采用之间的关系,且招募的主要是孕妇或产后样本。