School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Stud Fam Plann. 2022 Mar;53(1):61-132. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12182. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
In recent years, there has been much reflection on the measures used to assess and monitor contraceptive programming outcomes. The meaning and measurement of intention-to-use (ITU) contraception, however, has had less attention and research despite its widespread inclusion in many major surveys. This paper takes a deeper look at the meaning and measurement of ITU around contraception. We conducted a scoping review guided by the following questions: What is the existing evidence regarding the measurement of ITU contraception? What definitions and measures are used? What do we know about the validity of these measures? We searched databases and found 112 papers to include in our review and combined this with a review of the survey instruments and behavioral theory. Our review found growing evidence around the construct of ITU in family planning programming and research. However there are inconsistencies in how ITU is defined and measured, and this tends not to be informed by advances in behavioral theory and research. Further work is needed to develop and test measures that capture the complexity of intention, examine how intention differently relates to longer-range goals compared to more immediate implementation, and demonstrate a positive relationship between ITU and contraceptive use.
近年来,人们对评估和监测避孕规划成果的措施进行了大量反思。然而,尽管意图使用(ITU)避孕在许多主要调查中广泛纳入,但对其含义和衡量方法的关注和研究却较少。本文深入探讨了围绕避孕的 ITU 的含义和衡量方法。我们在以下问题的指导下进行了范围界定审查:关于 ITU 避孕的衡量方法,现有哪些证据?使用了哪些定义和措施?我们对这些措施的有效性了解多少?我们搜索了数据库,找到了 112 篇论文纳入我们的综述,并结合对调查工具和行为理论的综述。我们的综述发现,在计划生育规划和研究中,关于 ITU 的结构的证据越来越多。然而,ITU 的定义和衡量方法存在不一致之处,而且这往往没有受到行为理论和研究的推进的影响。需要进一步努力开发和测试能够捕捉意图复杂性的措施,研究意图如何与更长远的目标相比,与更直接的实施方式不同地相关,并证明 ITU 与避孕使用之间存在积极关系。