• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用公开可用数据构建子宫肌瘤的多血统多基因风险评分凸显了包容性基因研究的必要性。

Constructing a multi-ancestry polygenic risk score for uterine fibroids using publicly available data highlights need for inclusive genetic research.

作者信息

Winters Jessica L G, Piekos Jacqueline A, Hellwege Jacklyn N, Dikilitas Ozan, Kullo Iftikhar J, Schaid Daniel J, Edwards Todd L, Velez Edwards Digna R

机构信息

Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Pac Symp Biocomput. 2025;30:268-280. doi: 10.1142/9789819807024_0020.

DOI:10.1142/9789819807024_0020
PMID:39670376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11731894/
Abstract

Uterine leiomyomata, or fibroids, are common gynecological tumors causing pelvic and menstrual symptoms that can negatively affect quality of life and child-bearing desires. As fibroids grow, symptoms can intensify and lead to invasive treatments that are less likely to preserve fertility. Identifying individuals at highest risk for fibroids can aid in access to earlier diagnoses. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) quantify genetic risk to identify those at highest risk for disease. Utilizing the PRS software PRS-CSx and publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from FinnGen and Biobank Japan, we constructed a multi-ancestry (META) PRS for fibroids. We validated the META PRS in two cross-ancestry cohorts. In the cross-ancestry Electronic Medical Record and Genomics (eMERGE) Network cohort, the META PRS was significantly associated with fibroid status and exhibited 1.11 greater odds for fibroids per standard deviation increase in PRS (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05 - 1.17, p = 5.21x10-5). The META PRS was validated in two BioVU cohorts: one using ICD9/ICD10 codes and one requiring imaging confirmation of fibroid status. In the ICD cohort, a standard deviation increase in the META PRS increased the odds of fibroids by 1.23 (95% CI: 1.15 - 1.32, p = 9.68x10-9), while in the imaging cohort, the odds increased by 1.26 (95% CI: 1.18 - 1.35, p = 2.40x10-11). We subsequently constructed single ancestry PRS for FinnGen (European ancestry [EUR]) and Biobank Japan (East Asian ancestry [EAS]) using PRS-CS and discovered a nominally significant association in the eMERGE cohort within fibroids and EAS PRS but not EUR PRS (95% CI: 1.09 - 1.20, p = 1.64x10-7). These findings highlight the strong predictive power of multi-ancestry PRS over single ancestry PRS. This study underscores the necessity of diverse population inclusion in genetic research to ensure precision medicine benefits all individuals equitably.

摘要

子宫平滑肌瘤,即纤维瘤,是常见的妇科肿瘤,会引起盆腔和月经症状,对生活质量和生育愿望产生负面影响。随着纤维瘤的生长,症状可能会加剧,并导致侵入性治疗,而这种治疗不太可能保留生育能力。识别纤维瘤风险最高的个体有助于更早地进行诊断。多基因风险评分(PRS)可量化遗传风险,以识别疾病风险最高的个体。利用PRS软件PRS-CSx以及来自芬兰基因库(FinnGen)和日本生物银行(Biobank Japan)的公开全基因组关联研究(GWAS)汇总统计数据,我们构建了一个针对纤维瘤的多血统(META)PRS。我们在两个跨血统队列中验证了META PRS。在跨血统电子病历与基因组学(eMERGE)网络队列中,META PRS与纤维瘤状态显著相关,PRS每增加一个标准差,患纤维瘤的几率就会增加1.11倍(95%置信区间[CI]:1.05 - 1.17,p = 5.21×10⁻⁵)。META PRS在两个BioVU队列中得到验证:一个使用国际疾病分类第九版/第十版(ICD9/ICD10)编码,另一个需要通过影像学确认纤维瘤状态。在ICD队列中,META PRS增加一个标准差会使患纤维瘤的几率增加1.23倍(95% CI:1.15 - 1.32,p = 9.68×10⁻⁹),而在影像学队列中,几率增加1.26倍(95% CI:1.18 - 1.35,p = 2.40×10⁻¹¹)。随后,我们使用PRS-CS为芬兰基因库(欧洲血统[EUR])和日本生物银行(东亚血统[EAS])构建了单血统PRS,并在eMERGE队列中发现纤维瘤与EAS PRS之间存在名义上的显著关联,但与EUR PRS不存在关联(95% CI:1.09 - 1.20,p = 1.64×10⁻⁷)。这些发现突出了多血统PRS相对于单血统PRS的强大预测能力。这项研究强调了在基因研究中纳入多样化人群的必要性,以确保精准医学公平地惠及所有个体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33b8/11731894/d678f095af35/nihms-2038212-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33b8/11731894/88688cff0d89/nihms-2038212-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33b8/11731894/d678f095af35/nihms-2038212-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33b8/11731894/88688cff0d89/nihms-2038212-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33b8/11731894/d678f095af35/nihms-2038212-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Constructing a multi-ancestry polygenic risk score for uterine fibroids using publicly available data highlights need for inclusive genetic research.利用公开可用数据构建子宫肌瘤的多血统多基因风险评分凸显了包容性基因研究的必要性。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2025;30:268-280. doi: 10.1142/9789819807024_0020.
2
Polygenic risk scores for cardiometabolic traits demonstrate importance of ancestry for predictive precision medicine.心血管代谢性状的多基因风险评分证明了血统对于预测性精准医学的重要性。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2025;30:748-765. doi: 10.1142/9789819807024_0056.
3
Uterine fibroid polygenic risk score (PRS) associates and predicts risk for uterine fibroid.子宫肌瘤多基因风险评分(PRS)与子宫肌瘤风险相关,并可预测子宫肌瘤风险。
Hum Genet. 2022 Nov;141(11):1739-1748. doi: 10.1007/s00439-022-02442-z. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
4
Polygenic risk scores for cardiometabolic traits demonstrate importance of ancestry for predictive precision medicine.多基因风险评分可用于预测心血管代谢特征,这表明了祖先对于预测精准医学的重要性。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2024;29:611-626.
5
Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of common cancers in East Asians: A population-based prospective cohort study.基于人群的前瞻性队列研究:东亚常见癌症的多基因风险评分预测。
Elife. 2023 Mar 27;12:e82608. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82608.
6
Risk assessment for colorectal cancer via polygenic risk score and lifestyle exposure: a large-scale association study of East Asian and European populations.基于多基因风险评分和生活方式暴露的结直肠癌风险评估:东亚和欧洲人群的大规模关联研究。
Genome Med. 2023 Jan 24;15(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13073-023-01156-9.
7
Admixture mapping of uterine fibroid size and number in African American women.非裔美国女性子宫肌瘤大小和数量的 admixture 定位分析
Fertil Steril. 2017 Dec;108(6):1034-1042.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.018.
8
Development and validation of genome-wide polygenic risk scores for predicting breast cancer incidence in Japanese females: a population-based case-cohort study.基于人群的病例-对照研究:开发和验证用于预测日本女性乳腺癌发病风险的全基因组多基因风险评分。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Feb;197(3):661-671. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06843-6. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
9
Polygenic burden in focal and generalized epilepsies.多基因负担在局灶性和全面性癫痫中的作用。
Brain. 2019 Nov 1;142(11):3473-3481. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz292.
10
Multi-Ancestry Polygenic Risk Score for Coronary Heart Disease Based on an Ancestrally Diverse Genome-Wide Association Study and Population-Specific Optimization.基于具有多种祖先的全基因组关联研究和人群特异性优化的冠心病多祖先多基因风险评分。
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2024 Jun;17(3):e004272. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.123.004272. Epub 2024 Feb 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Principles and methods for transferring polygenic risk scores across global populations.多基因风险评分在全球人群中的转移原理和方法。
Nat Rev Genet. 2024 Jan;25(1):8-25. doi: 10.1038/s41576-023-00637-2. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
2
FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population.FinnGen 为一个表型良好的隔离人群提供了遗传学方面的见解。
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7944):508-518. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05473-8. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
3
Improving polygenic prediction in ancestrally diverse populations.提高在祖源多样化人群中的多基因预测能力。
Nat Genet. 2022 May;54(5):573-580. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01054-7. Epub 2022 May 5.
4
Uterine fibroid polygenic risk score (PRS) associates and predicts risk for uterine fibroid.子宫肌瘤多基因风险评分(PRS)与子宫肌瘤风险相关,并可预测子宫肌瘤风险。
Hum Genet. 2022 Nov;141(11):1739-1748. doi: 10.1007/s00439-022-02442-z. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
5
Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: potential benefits, risks and gaps.临床中多基因风险评分的合理使用:潜在的获益、风险和差距。
Nat Med. 2021 Nov;27(11):1876-1884. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01549-6. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
6
A cross-population atlas of genetic associations for 220 human phenotypes.220 个人类表型的跨人群遗传关联图谱。
Nat Genet. 2021 Oct;53(10):1415-1424. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00931-x. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
7
Discovery and implications of polygenicity of common diseases.常见疾病多基因遗传的发现及其意义。
Science. 2021 Sep 24;373(6562):1468-1473. doi: 10.1126/science.abi8206. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
8
Polygenic Risk Scores.多基因风险评分。
Curr Protoc. 2021 May;1(5):e126. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.126.
9
Improving reporting standards for polygenic scores in risk prediction studies.提高风险预测研究中多基因评分报告标准。
Nature. 2021 Mar;591(7849):211-219. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03243-6. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
10
Polygenic risk scores: from research tools to clinical instruments.多基因风险评分:从研究工具到临床工具。
Genome Med. 2020 May 18;12(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13073-020-00742-5.