Kember Rachel L, Verma Shefali S, Verma Anurag, Xiao Brenda, Lucas Anastasia, Kripke Colleen M, Judy Renae, Chen Jinbo, Damrauer Scott M, Rader Daniel J, Ritchie Marylyn D
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2025;30:748-765. doi: 10.1142/9789819807024_0056.
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have predominantly been derived from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted in European ancestry (EUR) individuals. In this study, we present an in-depth evaluation of PRS based on multi-ancestry GWAS for five cardiometabolic phenotypes in the Penn Medicine BioBank (PMBB) followed by a phenome-wide association study (PheWAS). We examine the PRS performance across all individuals and separately in African ancestry (AFR) and EUR ancestry groups. For AFR individuals, PRS derived using the multi-ancestry LD panel showed a higher effect size for four out of five PRSs (DBP, SBP, T2D, and BMI) than those derived from the AFR LD panel. In contrast, for EUR individuals, the multi-ancestry LD panel PRS demonstrated a higher effect size for two out of five PRSs (SBP and T2D) compared to the EUR LD panel. These findings underscore the potential benefits of utilizing a multi-ancestry LD panel for PRS derivation in diverse genetic backgrounds and demonstrate overall robustness in all individuals. Our results also revealed significant associations between PRS and various phenotypic categories. For instance, CAD PRS was linked with 18 phenotypes in AFR and 82 in EUR, while T2D PRS correlated with 84 phenotypes in AFR and 78 in EUR. Notably, associations like hyperlipidemia, renal failure, atrial fibrillation, coronary atherosclerosis, obesity, and hypertension were observed across different PRSs in both AFR and EUR groups, with varying effect sizes and significance levels. However, in AFR individuals, the strength and number of PRS associations with other phenotypes were generally reduced compared to EUR individuals. Our study underscores the need for future research to prioritize 1) conducting GWAS in diverse ancestry groups and 2) creating a cosmopolitan PRS methodology that is universally applicable across all genetic backgrounds. Such advances will foster a more equitable and personalized approach to precision medicine.
多基因风险评分(PRS)主要来自于对欧洲血统(EUR)个体进行的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)。在本研究中,我们基于宾夕法尼亚大学医学数据库(PMBB)中五种心脏代谢表型的多血统GWAS对PRS进行了深入评估,随后进行了全表型组关联研究(PheWAS)。我们检查了所有个体的PRS表现,并分别在非洲血统(AFR)和欧洲血统组中进行了检查。对于AFR个体,使用多血统连锁不平衡(LD)面板得出的PRS在五个PRS(舒张压、收缩压、2型糖尿病和体重指数)中有四个显示出比从AFR LD面板得出的更高的效应大小。相比之下,对于EUR个体,与EUR LD面板相比,多血统LD面板PRS在五个PRS中有两个(收缩压和2型糖尿病)显示出更高的效应大小。这些发现强调了在不同遗传背景下利用多血统LD面板进行PRS推导的潜在益处,并证明了在所有个体中的总体稳健性。我们的结果还揭示了PRS与各种表型类别之间的显著关联。例如,CAD PRS与AFR中的18种表型和EUR中的82种表型相关,而T2D PRS与AFR中的84种表型和EUR中的78种表型相关。值得注意的是,在AFR和EUR组的不同PRS中都观察到了高脂血症、肾衰竭、心房颤动、冠状动脉粥样硬化、肥胖和高血压等关联,其效应大小和显著性水平各不相同。然而,与EUR个体相比,AFR个体中PRS与其他表型的关联强度和数量普遍降低。我们的研究强调了未来研究需要优先考虑1)在不同血统群体中进行GWAS,以及2)创建一种适用于所有遗传背景的全球通用PRS方法。这些进展将促进更公平和个性化的精准医学方法。