Suppr超能文献

基于深度学习的根尖片根尖指数评分分类系统的开发

Development of Periapical Index Score Classification System in Periapical Radiographs Using Deep Learning.

作者信息

Hirata Natdanai, Pudhieng Panupong, Sena Sadanan, Torn-Asa Suebpong, Panyarak Wannakamon, Klanliang Kittipit, Wantanajittikul Kittichai

机构信息

Department of Radiologic Technology, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.

Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Oral Biology and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.

出版信息

J Imaging Inform Med. 2024 Dec 13. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01360-y.

Abstract

Periapical index (PAI) scoring system is the most popular index for evaluating apical periodontitis (AP) on radiographs. It provides an ordinal scale of 1 to 5, ranging from healthy to severe AP. Scoring PAI is a time-consuming process and requires experienced dentists; thus, deep learning has been applied to hasten the process. However, most models failed to score the early stage of AP or the score 2 accurately since it shares very similar characteristics with its adjacent scores. In this study, we developed and compared binary classification methods for PAI scores which were normality classification method and health-disease classification method. The normality classification method classified PAI score 1 as Normal and Abnormal for the rest of the scores while the health-disease method classified PAI scores 1 and 2 as Healthy and Diseased for the rest of the scores. A total of 2266 periapical root areas (PRAs) from 520 periapical radiographs (Pas) were selected and scored by experts. GoogLeNet, AlexNet, and ResNet convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were used in this study. Trained models' performances were evaluated and then compared. The models in the normality classification method achieved the highest accuracy of 75.00%, while the health-disease method models performed better with the highest accuracy of 83.33%. In conclusion, CNN models performed better in classification when grouping PAI scores 1 and 2 together in the same class, supporting the health-disease PAI scoring usage in clinical practice.

摘要

根尖指数(PAI)评分系统是在X线片上评估根尖周炎(AP)最常用的指数。它提供了一个从1到5的有序量表,范围从健康到重度AP。对PAI进行评分是一个耗时的过程,需要经验丰富的牙医;因此,深度学习已被应用于加速这一过程。然而,大多数模型未能准确对AP的早期阶段或2分进行评分,因为它与其相邻分数具有非常相似的特征。在本研究中,我们开发并比较了PAI评分的二元分类方法,即正常分类法和健康-疾病分类法。正常分类法将PAI评分为1分归为正常,其余分数归为异常,而健康-疾病分类法将PAI评分为1分和2分归为健康,其余分数归为患病。从520张根尖X线片(PA)中选取了总共2266个根尖根区(PRA),并由专家进行评分。本研究使用了GoogLeNet、AlexNet和ResNet卷积神经网络(CNN)。对训练模型的性能进行评估,然后进行比较。正常分类法中的模型达到了最高75.00%的准确率,而健康-疾病分类法模型表现更好,最高准确率为83.33%。总之,当将PAI评分1分和2分归为同一类时,CNN模型在分类方面表现更好,这支持了健康-疾病PAI评分在临床实践中的应用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验