• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于缓释哌甲酯(MPH-MR)治疗中国注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童及青少年的疗效、安全性和耐受性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial on the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Modified-Release Methylphenidate (MPH-MR) in Chinese Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).

作者信息

Zheng Yi, Liu Huaqing, Wang Xiuxia, Li Haibo, Ruhmann Michaela, Mayer Anke, Dangel Oliver, Ammer Richard

机构信息

Beijing Anding Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

CNS Drugs. 2025 Mar;39(3):289-304. doi: 10.1007/s40263-024-01136-6. Epub 2024 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1007/s40263-024-01136-6
PMID:39671144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11850499/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The efficacy and safety of modified-release methylphenidate (MPH-MR) in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have been shown in both pediatric and adult Caucasian patients. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of MPH-MR in Chinese children and adolescents with ADHD.

METHODS

MICCA was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 19 sites in China from September 2018 to July 2021. The study enrolled children and adolescents aged 6 to < 18 years with a primary diagnosis of ADHD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). Patients were randomized 1:1 to once-daily MPH-MR (10-60 mg) or placebo. The study included an up-titration phase of up to 5 weeks and a dose maintenance phase of 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) total score from baseline to the end of the maintenance phase (EoM). Secondary endpoints included the change from baseline to EoM in Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P) total score, and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scores at EoM. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and vital signs.

RESULTS

A total of 221 patients were randomized (MPH-MR: n = 110; placebo: n = 111). The change in the ADHD-RS-IV total score from baseline to EoM was significantly greater for MPH-MR versus placebo, with a least squares (LS) mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) treatment difference of - 4.6 (- 6.92, - 2.30) (p < 0.001). The mean (95% CI) treatment difference for the WFIRS-P total score change from baseline to EoM also significantly favored MPH-MR over placebo (- 6.46 [- 10.57, - 2.34]; p = 0.002). The CGI-I score at EoM was significantly lower in the MPH-MR group compared to the placebo group (2.2 vs 2.5; p = 0.002). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported for 74 (67.3%) patients in the MPH-MR group and 55 (49.1%) patients in the placebo group. Most TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity. The most common TEAEs for MPH-MR were decreased appetite, nausea and upper respiratory tract infection. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation/study withdrawal were reported in 4 (3.6%) patients in the MPH-MR group and 1 (0.9%) patient in the placebo group. No clinically relevant changes in vital signs were observed during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified-release methylphenidate was superior to placebo in improving ADHD symptoms and functioning in Chinese pediatric patients with ADHD. Modified-release methylphenidate had a good safety and tolerability profile. Trial Registration http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/ Identifier: CTR20180056 (registered on 21 May 2018).

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed9/11850499/f047d1ce8e81/40263_2024_1136_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed9/11850499/424a7a5b933c/40263_2024_1136_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed9/11850499/302f9593db02/40263_2024_1136_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed9/11850499/8c0651362a84/40263_2024_1136_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed9/11850499/65e45555a6d7/40263_2024_1136_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed9/11850499/f047d1ce8e81/40263_2024_1136_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed9/11850499/424a7a5b933c/40263_2024_1136_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed9/11850499/302f9593db02/40263_2024_1136_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed9/11850499/8c0651362a84/40263_2024_1136_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed9/11850499/65e45555a6d7/40263_2024_1136_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eed9/11850499/f047d1ce8e81/40263_2024_1136_Fig5_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景与目的

在儿科和成年白种人患者中,已证实缓释哌甲酯(MPH-MR)治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的有效性和安全性。本研究的目的是评估MPH-MR在中国ADHD儿童和青少年中的有效性和安全性。

方法

MICCA是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,于2018年9月至2021年7月在中国的19个地点进行。该研究纳入了年龄在6至<18岁、根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)初步诊断为ADHD的儿童和青少年。患者按1:1随机分配至每日一次的MPH-MR(10 - 60毫克)或安慰剂组。研究包括长达5周的剂量滴定阶段和4周的剂量维持阶段。主要疗效终点是从基线到维持期末(EoM)的ADHD评定量表-IV(ADHD-RS-IV)总分变化。次要终点包括从基线到EoM的维斯功能损害评定量表-家长报告(WFIRS-P)总分变化,以及EoM时的临床总体印象改善(CGI-I)评分。安全性评估包括治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAEs)和生命体征。

结果

共有221例患者被随机分组(MPH-MR组:n = 110;安慰剂组:n = 111)。从基线到EoM,MPH-MR组的ADHD-RS-IV总分变化显著大于安慰剂组,最小二乘(LS)均值(95%置信区间[CI])治疗差异为 - 4.6(- 6.92,- 2.30)(p < 0.001)。从基线到EoM的WFIRS-P总分变化的均值(95% CI)治疗差异也显著有利于MPH-MR组而非安慰剂组(- 6.46 [- 10.57,- 2.34];p = 0.002)。与安慰剂组相比,MPH-MR组在EoM时的CGI-I评分显著更低(2.2对2.5;p = 0.002)。MPH-MR组有74例(67.3%)患者报告了治疗中出现的不良事件,安慰剂组有55例(49.1%)患者报告了此类事件。大多数TEAEs的严重程度为轻度至中度。MPH-MR最常见的TEAEs是食欲减退、恶心和上呼吸道感染。MPH-MR组有4例(3.6%)患者和安慰剂组有1例(0.9%)患者报告了导致停用研究药物/退出研究的治疗中出现的不良事件。研究期间未观察到生命体征的临床相关变化。

结论

在改善中国ADHD儿科患者的ADHD症状和功能方面,缓释哌甲酯优于安慰剂。缓释哌甲酯具有良好的安全性和耐受性。试验注册:http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/ 标识符:CTR20180056(于2018年5月21日注册)。

相似文献

1
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial on the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Modified-Release Methylphenidate (MPH-MR) in Chinese Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).关于缓释哌甲酯(MPH-MR)治疗中国注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童及青少年的疗效、安全性和耐受性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
CNS Drugs. 2025 Mar;39(3):289-304. doi: 10.1007/s40263-024-01136-6. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
2
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Acute Comparator Trials of Lisdexamfetamine and Extended-Release Methylphenidate in Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.随机、双盲、安慰剂对照急性对照试验:右苯丙胺和哌甲酯缓释剂治疗青少年注意缺陷多动障碍。
CNS Drugs. 2017 Nov;31(11):999-1014. doi: 10.1007/s40263-017-0468-2.
3
A post hoc comparison of the effects of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate on symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents.赖氨酸安非他命甲硫酸盐和渗透压释放口服系统哌甲酯对儿童和青少年注意缺陷多动障碍症状的影响的事后比较。
CNS Drugs. 2013 Sep;27(9):743-51. doi: 10.1007/s40263-013-0086-6.
4
Efficacy of Methylphenidate Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsules (Aptensio XR™) in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Study.盐酸哌甲酯缓释胶囊(Aptensio XR™)治疗儿童和青少年注意力缺陷/多动障碍的疗效:一项III期随机双盲研究。
CNS Drugs. 2015 Apr;29(4):331-40. doi: 10.1007/s40263-015-0241-3.
5
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Flexible-Dose Titration Study of Methylphenidate Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsules (Aptensio XR) in Preschool Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.盐酸哌甲酯控释胶囊(Aptensio XR)治疗学龄前注意缺陷多动障碍患儿的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、剂量滴定研究。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2020 Mar;30(2):58-68. doi: 10.1089/cap.2019.0085. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
6
Efficacy and Safety of HLD200, Delayed-Release and Extended-Release Methylphenidate, in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.缓释和长效释放型哌甲酯(HLD200)治疗注意缺陷/多动障碍儿童的疗效与安全性
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2017 Aug;27(6):474-482. doi: 10.1089/cap.2017.0084. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
7
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.一项评估维洛沙嗪缓释胶囊治疗成人注意缺陷多动障碍的疗效和安全性的 III 期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
CNS Drugs. 2022 Aug;36(8):897-915. doi: 10.1007/s40263-022-00938-w. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
8
European, randomized, phase 3 study of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一项针对儿童和青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的 lisdexamfetamine dimesylate 的欧洲、随机、3 期研究。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Oct;23(10):1208-18. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.11.012. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
9
Efficacy and Safety of a Long-Acting Multilayer-Release Methylphenidate Formulation (PRC-063) in the Treatment of Adolescent Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial with a 6-Month Open-Label Extension.长效多层释放哌醋甲酯制剂(PRC-063)治疗青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的疗效和安全性:一项为期 6 个月的开放性扩展的随机、双盲临床试验。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2021 Nov;31(9):610-622. doi: 10.1089/cap.2021.0034. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
10
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Two-Way Crossover Clinical Trial of ORADUR-Methylphenidate for Treating Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.奥达路德-哌甲酯治疗儿童和青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、两交叉临床试验。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2021 Apr;31(3):164-178. doi: 10.1089/cap.2020.0104. Epub 2020 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety of Stimulants Across Patient Populations: A Meta-Analysis.不同患者群体中兴奋剂的安全性:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e259492. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9492.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine in Medication-Naive Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in a Real-World Setting.在真实环境中,哌甲酯和托莫西汀治疗初治注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童的疗效和安全性
Drugs R D. 2024 Mar;24(1):29-39. doi: 10.1007/s40268-023-00445-3. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
2
Incidence, prevalence, and global burden of ADHD from 1990 to 2019 across 204 countries: data, with critical re-analysis, from the Global Burden of Disease study.1990 年至 2019 年期间,全球 204 个国家的 ADHD 发病率、患病率和疾病负担:来自全球疾病负担研究的具有关键重新分析的数据。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Nov;28(11):4823-4830. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02228-3. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
3
Dose titration of osmotic release oral system methylphenidate in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a retrospective cohort study.
注意缺陷多动障碍儿童和青少年中渗透释放口腔系统哌甲酯的剂量滴定:回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Jan 23;23(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-03850-4.
4
Placebo Response and Its Predictors in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analysis and Comparison of Meta-Regression and MetaForest.安慰剂反应及其在注意缺陷多动障碍中的预测因素:荟萃分析和荟萃回归与元森林的比较。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2022 Jan 12;25(1):26-35. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyab054.
5
Prevalence of mental disorders in school children and adolescents in China: diagnostic data from detailed clinical assessments of 17,524 individuals.中国学童和青少年精神障碍的患病率:来自对 17524 个人进行详细临床评估的诊断数据。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;63(1):34-46. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13445. Epub 2021 May 21.
6
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Two-Way Crossover Clinical Trial of ORADUR-Methylphenidate for Treating Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.奥达路德-哌甲酯治疗儿童和青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、两交叉临床试验。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2021 Apr;31(3):164-178. doi: 10.1089/cap.2020.0104. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
7
Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents.儿童和青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的诊断、评估和治疗临床实践指南。
Pediatrics. 2019 Oct;144(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2528.
8
Quantifying the Protective Effects of Stimulants on Functional Outcomes in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Focus on Number Needed to Treat Statistic and Sex Effects.量化兴奋剂对注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)功能结局的保护作用:关注需要治疗的人数(NNT)统计和性别效应。
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Dec;65(6):784-789. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.05.015. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
9
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, School Performance, and Effect of Medication.注意缺陷多动障碍、学业表现和药物治疗的效果。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;58(4):423-432. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.11.014. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
10
Conceptual review of measuring functional impairment: findings from the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale.功能障碍测量的概念性回顾:来自 Weiss 功能障碍评定量表的研究结果。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Nov;21(4):155-164. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2018-300025. Epub 2018 Oct 12.