Murray Fionnuala, Yoo Okhee, Brophy-Williams Samuel, Rawlins Matthew, Wallis Steven C, Roberts Jason A, Raby Edward, Salman Sam, Manning Laurens
Department of Infectious Diseases, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia.
Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 Feb 3;80(2):347-353. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae397.
Subcutaneous (SC) administration of antibiotics is a practical alternative to IV administration. Cefazolin is widely used for skin and soft tissue infections and other complex infections by IV administration.
In this prospective, cross-over self-controlled study, a single dose of SC cefazolin was administered to 15 stable inpatients established on IV cefazolin as part of their management plan. The equivalent dose of cefazolin was diluted in 50 mL of normal saline via gravity feed over 30 min. Venous blood samples were collected at baseline and 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h following both the SC and IV doses. Antibiotic concentrations were measured using UPLC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic data were analysed using a non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach. Pain scores and infusion site reactions (oedema/erythema) were evaluated.
SC cefazolin was well tolerated. The bioavailability of SC administration was 74.8% (95% CI 66.7%-81.7%). Slower absorption from SC tissue was associated with a BMI of ≥30. Lower peak, and higher trough concentrations were observed with SC administration. Although lower bioavailability was observed with SC administration, the PTA for unbound drug concentrations greater than the MIC for more than 90% of the time between doses was higher for SC compared with IV administration at MICs between 0.25 and 4 mg/L. Simulated SC doses of 3 g twice daily had similar PTA to standard IV dosing of 2 g three times daily. A simulated 6 g continuous 24 h infusion of SC cefazolin had a favourable pharmacokinetic profile.
SC cefazolin appears to be well tolerated, with an improved pharmacokinetic profile compared with IV administration. Either 3 g twice daily, or 6 g as a 24 h SC infusion could be considered for future evaluation.
皮下注射抗生素是静脉注射的一种实用替代方法。头孢唑林广泛用于静脉注射治疗皮肤和软组织感染及其他复杂感染。
在这项前瞻性、交叉自我对照研究中,对15名接受静脉注射头孢唑林作为治疗方案一部分的病情稳定的住院患者给予单剂量皮下注射头孢唑林。将等量的头孢唑林在50毫升生理盐水中通过重力滴注在30分钟内输注完毕。在皮下注射和静脉注射剂量后的基线以及0.5、1、2、4和8小时采集静脉血样。使用超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测量抗生素浓度。采用非线性混合效应建模方法分析药代动力学数据。评估疼痛评分和输注部位反应(水肿/红斑)。
皮下注射头孢唑林耐受性良好。皮下给药的生物利用度为74.8%(95%置信区间66.7%-81.7%)。皮下组织吸收较慢与体重指数≥30有关。皮下给药观察到较低的峰值和较高的谷浓度。尽管皮下给药观察到较低的生物利用度,但在0.25至4毫克/升的最低抑菌浓度下,皮下给药时游离药物浓度大于最低抑菌浓度的给药间隔时间内超过90%的时间的达标概率高于静脉注射。模拟每日两次皮下注射3克的剂量与标准静脉注射每日三次2克的剂量具有相似的达标概率。模拟皮下连续24小时输注6克头孢唑林具有良好的药代动力学特征。
皮下注射头孢唑林似乎耐受性良好,与静脉注射相比药代动力学特征有所改善。未来评估可考虑每日两次3克或24小时皮下输注6克的方案。