• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于比较两个独立指数-伽马均值的统计方法及其在单细胞蛋白质数据中的应用。

Statistical methods for comparing two independent exponential-gamma means with application to single cell protein data.

作者信息

Wang Jia, Tian Lili, Yan Li

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 13;19(12):e0314705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314705. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0314705
PMID:39671382
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11643000/
Abstract

In genomic study, log transformation is a common prepossessing step to adjust for skewness in data. This standard approach often assumes that log-transformed data is normally distributed, and two sample t-test (or its modifications) is used for detecting differences between two experimental conditions. However, recently it was shown that two sample t-test can lead to exaggerated false positives, and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney (WMW) test was proposed as an alternative for studies with larger sample sizes. In addition, studies have demonstrated that the specific distribution used in modeling genomic data has profound impact on the interpretation and validity of results. The aim of this paper is three-fold: 1) to present the Exp-gamma distribution (exponential-gamma distribution stands for log-transformed gamma distribution) as a proper biological and statistical model for the analysis of log-transformed protein abundance data from single-cell experiments; 2) to demonstrate the inappropriateness of two sample t-test and the WMW test in analyzing log-transformed protein abundance data; 3) to propose and evaluate statistical inference methods for hypothesis testing and confidence interval estimation when comparing two independent samples under the Exp-gamma distributions. The proposed methods are applied to analyze protein abundance data from a single-cell dataset.

摘要

在基因组研究中,对数变换是调整数据偏度的常见预处理步骤。这种标准方法通常假定对数变换后的数据呈正态分布,并且使用两样本t检验(或其变体)来检测两种实验条件之间的差异。然而,最近有研究表明,两样本t检验可能会导致过高的假阳性率,因此有人提出将 Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney(WMW)检验作为大样本量研究的替代方法。此外,研究还表明,用于基因组数据建模的特定分布对结果的解释和有效性有深远影响。本文的目的有三个:1)提出指数-伽马分布(指数-伽马分布代表对数变换后的伽马分布)作为分析单细胞实验中对数变换后的蛋白质丰度数据的合适生物学和统计模型;2)证明两样本t检验和WMW检验在分析对数变换后的蛋白质丰度数据时的不适用性;3)提出并评估在指数-伽马分布下比较两个独立样本时用于假设检验和置信区间估计的统计推断方法。所提出的方法被应用于分析来自一个单细胞数据集的蛋白质丰度数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11643000/117c68011f57/pone.0314705.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11643000/2657dd621866/pone.0314705.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11643000/9931c2d13acd/pone.0314705.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11643000/49421ede8b54/pone.0314705.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11643000/f9c79f4b29f4/pone.0314705.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11643000/46d9c7c5de39/pone.0314705.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11643000/117c68011f57/pone.0314705.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11643000/2657dd621866/pone.0314705.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11643000/9931c2d13acd/pone.0314705.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11643000/49421ede8b54/pone.0314705.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11643000/f9c79f4b29f4/pone.0314705.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11643000/46d9c7c5de39/pone.0314705.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2733/11643000/117c68011f57/pone.0314705.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Statistical methods for comparing two independent exponential-gamma means with application to single cell protein data.用于比较两个独立指数-伽马均值的统计方法及其在单细胞蛋白质数据中的应用。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 13;19(12):e0314705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314705. eCollection 2024.
2
The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test under scrutiny.接受审视的威尔科克森-曼-惠特尼检验
Stat Med. 2009 May 1;28(10):1487-97. doi: 10.1002/sim.3561.
3
Some power considerations when deciding to use transformations.决定使用变换时的一些功率考量因素。
Stat Med. 1994;13(5-7):769-83. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780130537.
4
Sample size calculations based on a difference in medians for positively skewed outcomes in health care studies.基于医疗保健研究中正向偏态结局中位数差异的样本量计算。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 2;17(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0426-1.
5
t-tests, non-parametric tests, and large studies--a paradox of statistical practice?t 检验、非参数检验与大型研究——统计实践中的悖论?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Jun 14;12:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-78.
6
A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.精神分裂症治疗资源消耗分析中处理偏态分布成本变量方法的比较。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2002 Mar;5(1):21-31.
7
Case for omitting tied observations in the two-sample t-test and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test.两样本 t 检验和 Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney 检验中剔除结的情况。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 24;13(7):e0200837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200837. eCollection 2018.
8
Should we always choose a nonparametric test when comparing two apparently nonnormal distributions?当比较两个明显非正态分布时,我们是否应该总是选择非参数检验?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Jan;54(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00264-x.
9
Unadjusted Bivariate Two-Group Comparisons: When Simpler is Better.未调整的双变量两组比较:简单即更好。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Jan;126(1):338-342. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002636.
10
Confidence intervals of the Mann-Whitney parameter that are compatible with the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.与 Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney 检验兼容的 Mann-Whitney 参数的置信区间。
Stat Med. 2018 Nov 30;37(27):3991-4006. doi: 10.1002/sim.7890. Epub 2018 Jul 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating differential abundance methods in microbiome data: A benchmark study.探究微生物组数据中的差异丰度方法:基准研究。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Sep 8;18(9):e1010467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010467. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Confidence interval estimation of the common mean of several gamma populations.多个伽马总体共同均值的置信区间估计。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 17;17(6):e0269971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269971. eCollection 2022.
3
Exaggerated false positives by popular differential expression methods when analyzing human population samples.
分析人类群体样本时,常用差异表达方法会导致假阳性结果夸大。
Genome Biol. 2022 Mar 15;23(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02648-4.
4
The Intriguing Landscape of Single-Cell Protein Analysis.单细胞蛋白质分析的迷人领域。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022 Apr;9(12):e2105932. doi: 10.1002/advs.202105932. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
5
Evaluation of the type I error rate when using parametric bootstrap analysis of a cluster randomized controlled trial with binary outcomes and a small number of clusters.评价一类错误率在使用参数 bootstrap 分析二分类结局和小数量的群组随机对照试验。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Mar;215:106654. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106654. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
6
Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data.多模态单细胞数据的综合分析。
Cell. 2021 Jun 24;184(13):3573-3587.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.048. Epub 2021 May 31.
7
The shape of gene expression distributions matter: how incorporating distribution shape improves the interpretation of cancer transcriptomic data.基因表达分布形状的重要性:如何结合分布形状提高癌症转录组数据的解释。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2020 Dec 28;21(Suppl 21):562. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-03892-w.
8
Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data.ATAC-seq 数据差异可及性分析策略的比较。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 23;10(1):10150. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66998-4.
9
The Ultimate qPCR Experiment: Producing Publication Quality, Reproducible Data the First Time.终极 qPCR 实验:首次获得具有出版质量、可重复数据
Trends Biotechnol. 2019 Jul;37(7):761-774. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.12.002. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
10
Metabolic Noise and Distinct Subpopulations Observed by Single Cell LAESI Mass Spectrometry of Plant Cells .通过植物细胞的单细胞激光解吸电喷雾电离质谱法观察到的代谢噪声和不同亚群
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Nov 15;9:1646. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01646. eCollection 2018.