Eid Maroua, Dang Van Simon, Hamon Yveline, Rineau Emmanuel, Riou Jérémie, Baufreton Christophe
Cardiac Surgery Department, University Hospital of Angers, 4 Rue Larrey, Angers, 49100, France.
Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, University Hospital of Angers, 4 Rue Larrey, Angers, 49100, France.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Dec 26;67(1). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae436.
Antiplatelet therapy increases the risk of bleeding and transfusion in patients undergoing extracorporeal circulation. Reduced goal-directed anticoagulation is a personalized approach to reduce the anticoagulation based on a lower targeted activated clotting time. We assessed whether reduced goal-directed anticoagulation using optimized extracorporeal circulation alleviates the risk of severe bleeding in patients treated by dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared to aspirin alone during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
A total of 2275 patients undergoing CABG from 2002 to 2022 were selected after propensity matching from a retrospective cohort of 3018 patients. Patients treated with a combination of aspirin and prasugrel or ticagrelor or clopidogrel were included in the DAPT group (n = 1111). Patients treated with aspirin alone (ASA) constituted the control group (n = 1164). Optimized extracorporeal circulation was conducted under reduced systemic anticoagulation with a target activated clotting time 250 s. Severe bleeding was assessed using 3 validated scores of bleeding: UDPB, E-CABG, and BARC-4.
While all scores showed low ranges of severe bleeding (<6%), they were significantly higher after DAPT compared to ASA (P values for UDPB, E-CABG, and BARC-4 at 0.016, 0.006, and 0.063, respectively). Higher maximal activated clotting time was associated with higher rate of transfusion (P < 0.001) and bleeding (P < 0.001) after multivariate adjustment. Mortality was 1.24% in DAPT vs 0.94% in ASA group (P = NS), whereas cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and transient ischaemic attack were low (<1%) and similar between groups.
Despite higher bleeding under DAPT compared to ASA alone, optimized extracorporeal circulation with reduced goal-directed anticoagulation alleviated severe bleeding which remained low in patients undergoing CABG.
抗血小板治疗会增加体外循环患者出血和输血的风险。降低目标导向抗凝是一种基于较低目标活化凝血时间来减少抗凝的个性化方法。我们评估了在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)期间,与单独使用阿司匹林相比,采用优化体外循环的降低目标导向抗凝是否能减轻接受双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)患者的严重出血风险。
从3018例患者的回顾性队列中进行倾向匹配后,选取了2002年至2022年期间共2275例行CABG的患者。接受阿司匹林联合普拉格雷或替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷治疗的患者纳入DAPT组(n = 1111)。单独接受阿司匹林治疗(ASA)的患者构成对照组(n = 1164)。在降低全身抗凝的情况下进行优化体外循环,目标活化凝血时间为250秒。使用3种经过验证的出血评分:UDPB、E-CABG和BARC-4来评估严重出血情况。
虽然所有评分显示严重出血的范围较低(<6%),但与ASA相比,DAPT后的严重出血评分显著更高(UDPB、E-CABG和BARC-4的P值分别为0.016、0.006和0.063)。多因素调整后,较高的最大活化凝血时间与较高的输血率(P < 0.001)和出血率(P < 0.001)相关。DAPT组的死亡率为1.24%,而ASA组为0.94%(P = 无统计学意义),而心源性死亡、心肌梗死、中风和短暂性脑缺血发作的发生率较低(<1%),且两组之间相似。
尽管与单独使用ASA相比,DAPT下的出血更多,但采用降低目标导向抗凝的优化体外循环减轻了严重出血,在接受CABG的患者中严重出血仍然较低。