Jang Jae-Sik, Jin Han-Young, Park Young-Ah, Yang Tae-Hyun, Seo Jeong-Sook, Kim Dae-Kyeong, Wi Jin-Hong
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea.
Am J Cardiol. 2025 Mar 15;239:8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.12.012. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) offers precise information about lesion morphology and enhances the optimization of endovascular treatments (EVT). Nevertheless, the impact of IVUS on the durability of EVTs and clinical outcomes remains uncertain. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of IVUS-guided EVT compared with angiography-guided EVT. We conducted a meta-analysis of trials comparing IVUS-guided and angiography-guided EVT. The primary end point was binary restenosis, whereas the secondary end points included reintervention, major amputation, death or amputation, and major adverse limb events (MALE). This meta-analysis included 19 studies with 800,452 patients. Compared with angiography-guided EVT, IVUS-guided EVT significantly reduced the risk of binary restenosis (risk ratio [RR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43 to 0.91, p = 0.02). It also reduced the risk of reintervention (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.90, p = 0.01), major amputation (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.98, p = 0.02), death or amputation (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.91, p = 0.007), and MALE (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.94, p = 0.03). Subgroup analysis for femoropopliteal disease revealed consistent benefits of IVUS guidance regarding binary restenosis (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.94, p = 0.03), reintervention (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.80, p = 0.003), major amputation (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99, p = 0.04), death or amputation (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.90, p = 0.007), and MALE (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96, p = 0.04). The sensitivity analysis of studies using drug-coated devices also showed the consistent benefit of IVUS guidance regarding binary restenosis. In conclusion, compared with angiography, IVUS-guided EVT provided improved clinical outcomes in terms of binary restenosis, reintervention, major amputation, death or amputation, and MALE in lower extremity artery disease, including femoropopliteal disease.
血管内超声(IVUS)可提供有关病变形态的精确信息,并有助于优化血管内治疗(EVT)。然而,IVUS对EVT耐久性和临床结局的影响仍不确定。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估IVUS引导的EVT与血管造影引导的EVT相比的疗效。我们对比较IVUS引导和血管造影引导的EVT的试验进行了荟萃分析。主要终点是二元再狭窄,次要终点包括再次干预、大截肢、死亡或截肢以及主要不良肢体事件(MALE)。该荟萃分析纳入了19项研究,共800452例患者。与血管造影引导的EVT相比,IVUS引导的EVT显著降低了二元再狭窄风险(风险比[RR]0.63,95%置信区间[CI]0.43至0.91,p = 0.02)。它还降低了再次干预风险(RR 0.59,95%CI 0.39至0.90,p = 0.01)、大截肢风险(RR 0.85,95%CI 0.74至0.98,p = 0.02)、死亡或截肢风险(RR 0.72,95%CI 0.56至0.91,p = 0.007)以及MALE风险(RR 0.52,95%CI 0.28至0.94,p = 0.03)。股腘动脉疾病的亚组分析显示,IVUS引导在二元再狭窄(RR 0.63,95%CI 0.42至0.94,p = 0.03)、再次干预(RR 0.51,95%CI 0.33至0.80,p = 0.003)、大截肢(RR 0.85,95%CI 0.73至0.99,p = 0.04)、死亡或截肢(RR 0.68,95%CI 0.51至0.90,p = 0.007)以及MALE(RR 0.51,95%CI 0.27至0.96,p = 0.04)方面具有一致的益处。使用药物涂层装置的研究的敏感性分析也显示了IVUS引导在二元再狭窄方面的一致益处。总之,与血管造影相比,IVUS引导的EVT在下肢动脉疾病(包括股腘动脉疾病)的二元再狭窄、再次干预、大截肢、死亡或截肢以及MALE方面提供了更好的临床结局。