Oduah Mary-Tiffany, Fatunde Olubadewa A, Farooqui Naba, LeMond Lisa, Sama Jacob, Rao Roopa, Ilonze Onyedika J
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2025 May;25(3):349-359. doi: 10.1007/s40256-024-00704-x. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
Inadequate decongestion remains an unmet need in the management of patients with heart failure. The concept of door-to-diuretic (D2D) time to improve outcomes has been proposed for patients with heart failure (HF), but the trial results have been mixed.
We utilized Preferred Reporting Instrument for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) for scoping reviews with an extensive a priori search strategy for databases: PubMed and Scopus between January 2015 and November 2023. We used the key search terms "door-to-diuretic time" OR "door-to-furosemide time" OR "acute heart failure decongestion". Early D2D time was defined as intravenous (IV) diuretic administration within 30-120 min of patient arrival to the healthcare facility. Articles were included if they met our criteria, were written in the English language, and investigated door-to-diuretic or furosemide time as a decongestive strategy to improve outcomes in patients with acute HF.
From 588 articles, 13 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria after excluding duplicates and articles that did not meet our inclusion criteria. Of these studies, there was 1 meta-analysis and 12 observational cohort/registry-based studies (10 were positive trials and 2 were neutral). The most common outcomes examined were mortality and rehospitalization with early diuretic administration. First, early treatment was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and shorter hospital length of stay. Second, higher doses of furosemide were associated with improved HF symptoms and decreased hospitalization, at the cost of transiently worsening renal function. Third, the evidence is mixed for long-term mortality benefits.
Although the impact of early D2D time on HF outcomes is mixed, early diuretic administration appears to be an effective and safe strategy that warrants further investigation in large-scale pragmatic comparative effectiveness trials. Future trials should consider utilizing diuretic efficiency-guided dose escalation and augmented diuresis using high-dose or combination diuretic therapy.
在心力衰竭患者的管理中,充分的去充血治疗仍是一项未得到满足的需求。已提出门到利尿剂(D2D)时间的概念以改善心力衰竭(HF)患者的预后,但试验结果不一。
我们使用系统评价和Meta分析扩展的首选报告工具(PRISMA-ScR)进行范围综述,并采用广泛的先验搜索策略检索数据库:2015年1月至2023年11月期间的PubMed和Scopus。我们使用了关键搜索词“门到利尿剂时间”或“门到呋塞米时间”或“急性心力衰竭去充血”。早期D2D时间定义为患者到达医疗机构后30 - 120分钟内静脉注射利尿剂。如果文章符合我们的标准、用英文撰写且研究了门到利尿剂或呋塞米时间作为改善急性HF患者预后的去充血策略,则纳入研究。
在588篇文章中,排除重复文章和不符合纳入标准的文章后,有13篇文章符合纳入标准。在这些研究中,有1项Meta分析和12项基于观察性队列/登记处的研究(10项为阳性试验,2项为中性试验)。研究最多的结局是早期使用利尿剂后的死亡率和再住院率。首先,早期治疗与较低的住院死亡率和较短的住院时间相关。其次,较高剂量的呋塞米与改善HF症状和减少住院相关,但代价是肾功能短暂恶化。第三,关于长期死亡率获益的证据不一。
尽管早期D2D时间对HF预后的影响不一,但早期使用利尿剂似乎是一种有效且安全的策略,值得在大规模实用的比较有效性试验中进一步研究。未来的试验应考虑采用利尿剂效率指导的剂量递增以及使用高剂量或联合利尿剂治疗增强利尿效果。