• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产术后经皮酮洛芬与芬太尼贴剂用于疼痛管理的比较、随机、双盲研究

Transdermal Ketoprofen Versus Fentanyl Patches for Pain Management Post-cesarean Section: A Comparative, Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

作者信息

Baheti Sandip, Muruganantham Sharan

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Nov 13;16(11):e73635. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73635. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.73635
PMID:39677197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11646163/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative pain management after a cesarean section is essential to promote mother-infant bonding and ease of breastfeeding. Transdermal patches present a viable alternative to oral medications, offering controlled drug delivery and better bioavailability while avoiding first-pass metabolism, all of which can facilitate smoother recovery and rehabilitation.

METHODS

This comparative, randomized, double-blind study was conducted on 70 parturients scheduled for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, classified as ASA II. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group K (transdermal ketoprofen patch, 30 mg) and Group F (transdermal fentanyl patch, 25 mcg). The patches were applied immediately after spinal anesthesia. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and sedation was assessed using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale for 24 hours.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the VAS scores between the two groups from two to 14 hours postoperatively. However, a statistically significant difference was observed at 16 hours (Group K 2 ± 0.87 vs. Group F 2.5 ± 0.86, p = 0.029) and 20 hours (Group K 1.77 ± 0.86 vs. Group F 2.33 ± 0.8, p = 0.011). Rescue analgesia was required in seven (20%) of the patients in Group K and 12 (34.29%) of the patients in Group F, though this difference was not statistically significant. At 20 hours, Group K had more alert and calm patients (33 (94.29%) vs. 26 (74.29%)), with fewer drowsy or restless patients compared to Group F (p = 0.044). At 24 hours, Group K had significantly fewer drowsy patients (0 (0%) vs. 13 (37.14%)) and more alert patients (34 (97.14%) vs. 19 (54.29%)), with fewer restless patients (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Both the ketoprofen patch (30 mg) and the fentanyl patch (25 mcg) provided comparable analgesia for the first 12 hours. However, at 16 and 20 hours, the ketoprofen patch was more effective than the fentanyl patch in providing analgesia. More patients in the fentanyl group were drowsy after 16 hours, though normal sleep patterns may have contributed to this observation.

摘要

引言

剖宫产术后的疼痛管理对于促进母婴亲密关系和便于母乳喂养至关重要。透皮贴剂是口服药物的一种可行替代方案,它能实现药物的控释,提高生物利用度,同时避免首过代谢,所有这些都有助于更顺利的恢复和康复。

方法

本比较性、随机、双盲研究针对70例计划在腰麻下行剖宫产术的产妇进行,这些产妇被分类为ASA II级。患者被随机分为两组:K组(30毫克酮洛芬透皮贴剂)和F组(25微克芬太尼透皮贴剂)。在腰麻后立即贴上贴剂。使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛,并使用里士满躁动镇静量表评估24小时内的镇静情况。

结果

术后2至14小时,两组的VAS评分无统计学显著差异。然而,在16小时(K组2±0.87 vs. F组2.5±0.86,p = 0.029)和20小时(K组1.77±0.86 vs. F组2.33±0.8,p = 0.011)观察到统计学显著差异。K组有7例(20%)患者需要补救镇痛,F组有12例(34.29%)患者需要补救镇痛,尽管这一差异无统计学意义。在20小时时,K组有更多警觉且平静的患者(33例(94.29%) vs. 26例(74.29%)),与F组相比,嗜睡或烦躁不安的患者更少(p = 0.044)。在24小时时,K组嗜睡的患者显著更少(0例(0%) vs. 13例(37.14%)),警觉的患者更多(34例(97.14%) vs. 19例(54.29%)),烦躁不安的患者更少(p < 0.0001)。

结论

酮洛芬贴剂(30毫克)和芬太尼贴剂(25微克)在最初12小时提供了相当的镇痛效果。然而,在16和20小时时,酮洛芬贴剂在提供镇痛方面比芬太尼贴剂更有效。芬太尼组在16小时后有更多患者嗜睡,尽管正常的睡眠模式可能导致了这一观察结果。

相似文献

1
Transdermal Ketoprofen Versus Fentanyl Patches for Pain Management Post-cesarean Section: A Comparative, Randomized, Double-Blind Study.剖宫产术后经皮酮洛芬与芬太尼贴剂用于疼痛管理的比较、随机、双盲研究
Cureus. 2024 Nov 13;16(11):e73635. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73635. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Efficacy of Transdermal Ketoprofen Patch in Comparison to Transdermal Diclofenac Patch in Postoperative Analgesia for Orthodontic Extractions: A Randomized Split-Mouth Study.透皮酮洛芬贴剂与透皮双氯芬酸贴剂用于正畸拔牙术后镇痛的疗效比较:一项随机双盲研究。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 17;15(4):e37732. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37732. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Transdermal fentanyl in postoperative pain.术后疼痛中的透皮芬太尼
Reg Anesth. 1997 Jan-Feb;22(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(06)80052-0.
4
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Wound Infiltration for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.腹横肌平面阻滞与切口浸润用于剖宫产术后镇痛的随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Apr;124(4):1291-1297. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001724.
5
[Post-cesarean section analgesia with low spinal morphine doses and systemic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug: diclofenac versus ketoprofen.].[低剂量脊髓吗啡联合全身非甾体类抗炎药用于剖宫产术后镇痛:双氯芬酸与酮洛芬的比较。]
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2003 Dec;53(6):737-42. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942003000600005.
6
Comparison Between Efficacy of Transdermal Ketoprofen and Diclofenac Patch in Patients Undergoing Therapeutic Extraction-A Randomized Prospective Split Mouth Study.透皮酮洛芬与双氯芬酸贴剂在治疗性拔牙患者中的疗效比较——一项随机前瞻性半口对照研究
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Oct;77(10):1998-2003. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
7
Comparison of the Effects of Intravenous Fentanyl and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Characteristics of Spinal Anesthesia.静脉注射芬太尼和静脉注射右美托咪定对脊髓麻醉特征的影响比较
Cureus. 2024 Oct 24;16(10):e72263. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72263. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8
Analgesic effect of erector spinae plane block after cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial.剖宫产术后竖脊肌平面阻滞的镇痛效果:一项随机对照试验。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2023 Feb;26(2):153-161. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_1636_21.
9
Fentanyl transdermal patch (Durogesic® D-TRANS) for post abdominal laparotomy analgesia: a double blind randomized study.芬太尼透皮贴剂(多瑞吉®D-TRANS)用于腹部剖腹术后镇痛:一项双盲随机研究。
Minerva Chir. 2015 Dec;70(6):401-8. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
10
Comparison of the effect of adding midazolam versus fentanyl to intrathecal levobupivacaine in patients undergoing cesarean section: double-blind, randomized clinical trial.比较鞘内给予左布比卡因时分别添加咪达唑仑与芬太尼对剖宫产患者的影响:双盲、随机临床试验。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):744385. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Ramsay Sedation Scale and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale: A Cross-sectional Study.拉姆齐镇静评分量表与里士满躁动镇静评分量表:一项横断面研究。
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2019 Mar/Apr;38(2):90-95. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000346.
2
Post-caesarean analgesia: What is new?剖宫产术后镇痛:有哪些新进展?
Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Mar;61(3):200-214. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_313_16.
3
Efficacy of fentanyl transdermal patch in pain control after lower third molar surgery: A preliminary study.芬太尼透皮贴剂在下颌第三磨牙手术后疼痛控制中的疗效:一项初步研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Sep 1;21(5):e621-5. doi: 10.4317/medoral.21161.
4
Postoperative pain management with transdermal fentanyl after forefoot surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.足底手术后经皮贴敷芬太尼用于术后疼痛管理:一项随机、安慰剂对照研究。
J Pain Res. 2015 Jan 16;8:39-45. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S69511. eCollection 2015.
5
Chronic pain after cesarean section. Influence of anesthetic/surgical technique and postoperative analgesia.剖宫产术后慢性疼痛。麻醉/手术技术及术后镇痛的影响。
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012 Nov-Dec;62(6):762-74. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(12)70177-0.
6
Ketoprofen absorption by muscle and tendon after topical or oral administration in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.关节镜下前交叉韧带重建术后患者局部和口服用酮洛芬后的肌肉和肌腱吸收。
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010 Mar;11(1):154-8. doi: 10.1208/s12249-009-9367-2. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
7
Mass vaccination: solutions in the skin.大规模疫苗接种:皮肤给药解决方案。
Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2006;304:247-68. doi: 10.1007/3-540-36583-4_14.
8
Topical ketoprofen patch.外用酮洛芬贴剂
Drugs R D. 2005;6(6):337-44. doi: 10.2165/00126839-200506060-00003.
9
Cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 selectivity of widely used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.广泛使用的非甾体抗炎药的环氧化酶-1和环氧化酶-2选择性
Am J Med. 1998 May;104(5):413-21. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00091-6.
10
Nurses' knowledge of pain assessment and management: how much progress have we made?护士对疼痛评估与管理的认知:我们取得了多大进展?
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997 Sep;14(3):175-88. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(97)00170-x.